Augmented Reality: The Construction Of An Augmented Reality

1297 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: James madison impact on modern day democracy

Simulation Report 1 Introduction I knew that I would enjoy the simulations because I have always enjoyed hands-on projects in my classes. Before I did any of the simulations I started the three simulations I looked at their titles. The first simulation, “You Are A Founder” really caught my attention because The Founders had many issues that they had to compromise on while making our Constitution. Since I knew some of The Founders issues they dealt with I figured I would not learn as much from it and thought I knew a lot about a police officers duties. Therefore, I thought I would learn the most from You Are A Federal Judge. All three simulations were very informational and eye-opening, but the simulation I enjoyed and learned the most from was You Are A Police Officer. I had never really considered how quickly they have to survey a certain situation and know exactly what to do. Since I found out so much from the You Are A Police Officer simulation I believe it was my favorite. All three were very cool and fun to participate in though. Title You Are A Founder Results The Founders had many obstacles that they had to overcome to write and ratify our Constitution. If James Madison had not made the correct decision on how to handle certain situations our country would not be where it is today. I made correct decisions on all of the challenges as James Madison in the simulation. All of the questions If I did not have any knowledge of the compromises that The Founders made when writing and ratifying our Constitution I do not think I would have been as successful. Chapter 2 in our textbook really helped me figure out the best solution for each challenge. For instance, one of the challenges was deciding if slaves should be counted in the census. If I had no prior knowledge of the Three-Fifths Compromise I would have had a much harder time figuring out the best solution.

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of The Quartet Orchestrating The Second American Revolution Harvard

    1094 Words  | 3 Pages

    He did not perceive the founding fathers to be experimental in nature. Ellis introduces each member of “The Quartet” with high praises, calling attention upon Washington’s organizational abilities, Hamilton’s financial skills, Madison’s drafting abilities, and Jay’s diplomacy tactics. Ellis advocated that through the superior leadership of each member, the creation of the American republic was inevitable. He argues, “To say, then, that ratification represented a clear statement about the will of the American people in 1787-1788 would be grossly misleading. What ratification really represented was triumph of superior organization, more talented leadership, and a political process that had been designed from the start to define the options narrowly” (Ellis 174). Each member excelled in his own field and persuaded fellow colleagues and the American people for the need for a document to replace the Articles of Confederation. Ellis additionally expounded on the built-in advantages these founding fathers had. He stressed upon their strengths, such as their ability to convene with similar ideas, versatility in many fields, persuading members of the opposition, and developing tactical propositions. After the founding fathers defeated Patrick Henry, a strong adversary and a harsh critic to the Constitution, Ellis wrote, “For better and for worse, the Constitution was destined to become the law of the land” (Ellis 187). These innate built-in advantages of the founding fathers were what helped them to achieve their goals. After analyzing these traits, Ellis concluded that the creation of the republic and the success of the founding fathers was indeed a special destiny, which was bound to

    Read More

  • Strict Constructionism Dbq

    930 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the early 1800s America was still developing, trying to develop the government so it can learn to stand up on its own. Both Thomas Jefferson and James Madison played a key role in the country’s developing time, they created the idea of strict v. broad constructionism. Political parties were contradicting each other on the different point of views they had on the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson during his presidency sometimes made decisions that were based literally on the Constitution, whereas James Madison being a broad constructionist didn’t always take the Constitution literally.

    Read More

  • Problems with the Articles of Confederation

    857 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although the Articles had problems of their own, they had constructive ideas that lead to the Constitution, which ended up being one of the most important documents written in US history.

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The U.s. Constitution

    753 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...ared that the ratification was not going to be achieved. For instance, John Jay wrote a letter to George Washington in 1786 explaining how at least during the American Revolution all people were united for the same goal, but now their objective is unclear and chaotic, (Document D). All together majority of the people demanded a full presentation within the government, “yet if it is deficient in this essential principle of a full and just representation of the people, it will only be a painted sepulcher,” meaning that without a solid list of rights protecting people and balance within the branches of government everything will collapse, (Document F). The main doubts created by the writing and ratification of the United States Constitution evolved from the between the federalists and the antifederalists, who had different visions of how the government should be run.

    Read More

  • Unequal Distribution Of Property And Factions

    1079 Words  | 3 Pages

    In conclusion, Madison thinks the human nature is ambitious, and the fixed outcome of human ambitions is people create factions to promote their own interests. In the case of preventing corrupt or mischief by factions, he believes majority and pure democracy is not a solution. The method he advocated is a large republic with checking system. He converts human ambition to provide internal checks and balances in government. His point of view stimulated the approval of the proposal of the United States Constitution.

    Read More

  • Federalists and Anti-Federalists

    1659 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Constitution, when first introduced, set the stage for much controversy in the United States. The two major parties in this battle were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists, such as James Madison, were in favor of ratifying the Constitution. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, such as Patrick Henry and Richard Henry Lee, were against ratification. Each party has their own beliefs on why or why not this document should or should not be passed. These beliefs are displayed in the following articles: Patrick Henry's "Virginia Should Reject the Constitution," Richard Henry Lee's "The Constitution Will Encourage Aristocracy," James Madison's "Federalist Paper No. 10," and "The Letters to Brutus." In these documents, many aspects of the Constitution, good and bad, are discussed. Although the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had very conflicting views, many common principals are discussed throughout their essays. The preservation of liberty and the effects of human nature are two aspects of these similarities. Although the similarities exist, they represent and support either the views of the Federalists or the Anti-Federalists.

    Read More

  • Federalist Policies

    1121 Words  | 3 Pages

    After the establishment of the constitution, the Federalist administrations faces many significant challenges when dealing with the economics of the United States; much of the country was divided over issues such as how to raise money, establishing a public credit system, how to pay the national debt, and whether or not a national bank should be established. Leaders like Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison came to represent the ideas of the people and as these ideas became more solid, debate and opposition rose. The Federalists saw multiple ways to resolve these issues, and the resolutions established that leadership in the United States would be successful.

    Read More

  • Alexander Hamilton's Personality

    767 Words  | 2 Pages

    The plan was a series of essays to support the ratification of the Constitution. The plan was to evenly write twenty-five essays to continue to defend the Constitution, with each man authoring about nine letters. In reality, eighty-five essays were written amongst the men--John Jay wrote five letters, Jame Madison wrote twenty-nine letters, and Alexander Hamilton wrote the other fifty-one. The breadth of Hamilton’s writing started with dangers of the hostilities between states and reached as the judiciary branch at large. Determined to influence the public, Hamilton wore his mind on his sleeve, prepared to share with anyone who would listen--from the average ranch hand born in the state of to those who would impact the decision made for the

    Read More

  • Democracy In The 19th Century

    1358 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the construction of the new Constitution, many of the most prominent and experienced political members of America’s society provided a framework on the future of the new country; they had in mind, because of the failures of the Articles of Confederation, a new kind of government where the national or Federal government would be the sovereign power, not the states. Because of the increased power of the national government over the individual states, many Americans feared it would hinder their ability to exercise their individual freedoms. Assuring the people, both Alexander Hamilton and James Madison insisted the new government under the constitution was “an expression of freedom, not its enemy,” declaring “the Constitution made political tyranny almost impossible.” (Foner, pg. 227) The checks and balances introduced under the new and more powerful national government would not allow the tyranny caused by a king under the Parliament system in Britain. They insisted that in order achieve a greater amount of freedom, a national government was needed to avoid the civil unrest during the system under the Articles of Confederation. Claiming that the new national government would be a “perfect balance between liberty and power,” it would avoid the disruption that liberty [civil unrest] and power [king’s abuse of power in England] caused. The “lackluster leadership” of the critics of the new constitution claimed that a large land area such as America could not work for such a diverse nation.

    Read More

  • The Creation Of The Constitution

    1073 Words  | 3 Pages

    In creating the Constitution, the states had several different reactions, including a rather defensive reaction, but also an understanding reaction. As a document that provided the laws of the land and the rights of its people. It directs its attention to the many problems in this country; it offered quite a challenge because the document lent itself to several views and interpretations, depending upon the individual reading it. It is clear that the founders’ perspectives as white, wealthy or elite class, American citizens would play a role in the creation and implementation of The Constitution.

    Read More

  • James Madison Accomplishments

    905 Words  | 2 Pages

    James Madison was an incredibly influential figure in the founding and beginning of the United States of America. From the drafting of the Constitution, to his presidency, to the War of 1812, Madison played a prominent role in leading the young country. Madison’s successes can be traced back to his education and his previous careers. Madison’s experience received from his earlier political career and from other presidential decisions defined his decisions made in the War of 1812.

    Read More

  • The United States Constitution: The Development Of The US Constitution

    850 Words  | 2 Pages

    The development of the U.S. Constitution was a series of many trials and errors. There were many problems starting from the Articles of Confederation and even the battle to ratify the constitution. Not everyone wanted the same thing for the new government, however they all agreed that they didn’t want the same type of government that they had unde English rule.

    Read More

  • A Summary Of The Exchange Between Thomas Jefferson And James Madison

    1133 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, after reading Madison’s side of argument, I could not help but agree with all of his points, and I believe that Jefferson’s theory would only be more detrimental than beneficial. A fresh start is always appealing to many—erase mistakes, start anew, if one does not like the end result, one can restart—it could be a great thing, depends on what one naturally would make use of in that fresh start. We already have the right to change the constitution through the amendment process and through the calling of a constitutional convention if needed. Jefferson’s idea would require rewriting the constitution every 19 years, whether it was working well with the previous generation or not. The constitution governs for the long-term, it was written in a way to make it difficult to change, but not impossible. The problem with changing constitution habitually when there is nothing wrong with it is the lack of stability and continuity on the socio-economic governance, which would result in a weak government, and event anarchy. What if the previous made an excellent improvement to the country, but then the 19-year expiration date

    Read More

  • The Compromises of the Founding Fathers in Founding Brothers byJoseph J. Ellis

    644 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...fferent plans in mind for the republic. In order to avoid endless debates on the issues presented, the revolutionary leaders often compromised their beliefs. The Founding Brothers compromised their ideas for the well-being of the United States. Joseph J. Ellis writes of the compromises that changed the constitutional debate into the creation of political parties in, The Founding Brothers. Without compromise our nation today would not be where it is now, compromising is a crucial element in the governing a country. This is a concept that our Founding Brothers have grasped fully.

    Read More

  • Human Nature and the Social Order

    849 Words  | 2 Pages

    Initially, when we read James Madison we learn the nature of factions. Factions play an important role in human nature because they are vessels of opinions. The opinion of one individual is not enough to cause change. Factions solve this by uniting people with similar opinions and allowing them to urge for change. Madison realized the unrelenting force of a faction left to grow without restraint. They were dangerous because they were often violent and disruptive often being called the “weakness of popular government”. At worst, they lead to civil war and at the least the inhibited the execution of public policy. While he acknowledge that the easiest way to remove a faction was to destroy their liberties, he knew that this would mean to declare a war on human nature. He also understood that removing their liberty would mean removing the liberty of others, which he did not want. Instead, he suggested controlling the effects of majority faction...

    Read More

More about Augmented Reality: The Construction Of An Augmented Reality

Open Document