Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of the atomic bomb on the world
Chernobyl nuclear accident essays
Chernobyl nuclear accident essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of the atomic bomb on the world
Throughout history we have seen a few nuclear disasters in both war and peace;¬¬ all of which have had a lasting impact on the societies near them. The largest nuclear power accident of all has been the one that occurred at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in 1986, but there have been many accidents that have occurred across the globe like the Mayak Plant Accident in 1957, the Three-Mile-Island Accident in 1979 and the Fukushima Daiichi Power Station Accident in 2011. Although these nuclear accidents are uncommon, their effects can be felt for many lifetimes, which is why nuclear power plants should be constructed further from human population centers. Nuclear power has been a touchy subject for many years. Ever since the bombing of Hiroshima and the later bombing of Nagasaki, people have yet to place their full confidence in nuclear energy because of the death toll it has the possibility of claiming if a critical failure or malfunction would occur. There are some factors about the detonation of the Atomic Bomb that need to be addressed in order to re-instill some confidence in nuclear power as a whole before continuing further. To name one, the United States government didn’t need to drop the Atomic Bomb to succeed against Japan in World War II. …show more content…
The Japanese government had admitted to their own defeat, mostly due to their naval fleets being destroyed, and intercepted messages had stated they were preparing for an unconditional surrender. The scientists in charge of the bomb were also aware of this information, but yet seemed very determined to make sure their project was used to its full potential. A few people had dissented against the majority and tried to sway people to not allow for the destructive power of the bomb to be used on the unsuspecting people of Japan, but their efforts yielded varying success
If they do not now accept our terms they may expect a rain of ruin from the air, the like of which has never been seen on this earth.” (Truman).The justification of the bombs was the fact that the bomb was only in retaliation to a hostile nation and there refusal to cooperate with the American government. Japan was attacking with no fear they were unwavering because there military mind set was to never surrender because it was a sign of weakness it was against their nature. And so was the United States we were not going to give up though we were not gaining anything from this war only loosing we had the same sort of national mindset that we could to surrender for the fear of being preserved as week. So with the rejection of surrender the United States dropped the bomb in order to stop a more brutal war and to protect the United States from having to drop out of the
In contrast, Maier and Selden’s thesis claims the act of dropping the atomic bomb was completely justifiable and not a war crime is the counter argument. Since, both authors address the fact that the world was at war and that aerial bombing was not something new, however, the technology advances were. In addition, their logic is reasonable because at the time of World War II almost everyone was using strategic and tactical aerial bombing, not to mention the Allies wanted to end the war as soon as possible. Thus, the atomic bomb was justifiable, however, it was a war crime. The objective of the tactical bombing was to aim at military targets it achieves its objective, however, killing thousands of lives in the process. The statement by Maier
The atomic bomb is the subject of much controversy. Since its first detonation in 1945, the entire world has heard the aftershocks of that blast. Issues concerning Nuclear Weapons sparked the Cold War. We also have the atomic bomb to thank for our relative peace in this time due to the fear of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). The effects of the atomic bomb might not have been the exact effects that the United States was looking for when they dropped Little Boy and Fat Man on Hiroshima and Nagasaki respectively (Grant, 1998). The original desire of the United States government when they dropped Little Boy and Fat Man on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not, in fact, the one more commonly known: that the two nuclear devices dropped upon Hiroshima and Nagasaki were detonated with the intention of bringing an end to the war with Japan, but instead to intimidate the Soviet Union. The fact of Japan's imminent defeat, the undeniable truth that relations with Russia were deteriorating, and competition for the division of Europe prove this without question.
“The atomic bomb certainly is the most powerful of all weapons, but it is conclusively powerful and effective only in the hands of the nation which controls the sky” (Johnson 1). Throughout World War II, the war was in pieces. The Germans were almost at world domination along with their allies, the Italians and Japanese. The Japanese and United states had remained at combat with each other since the bombarding of the Pearl Harbor ("U.S. Drops Atomic Bomb on Japan "1). There was abundant controversy as to whether the United States should have used the atomic bombs or not. There were many factors as to the argument relating to the atomic bombs leading to the United States final decision. Many people had arguments for the bombing and others had arguments against the bombings but it is still not determined if the United States made the right decision.
Nuclear power has no place in having a safe, clean, sustainable future. Today, the manufacturing of nuclear power plants has become a critical topic throughout the world that many strongly believe should be stopped. Nuclear Power is not safe anywhere in the world nor is it environmentally friendly. Nuclear power plants are truly something that could cause mass destruction in the world and has the potential to wipe out a whole country with ease. Despite proponents’ that claim that nuclear power is safe, there is a history that proves otherwise and marks a number of disasters caused by nuclear power plants.
“With this bomb we have now added a new and revolutionary increase in destruction to supplement the growing power of our armed forces”- President Truman. In the 1945, President Truman was faced with an atomic dilemma in the most destructive war that mankind has seen so far. His choices were to either bomb Japan or let more American soldiers die. He chose to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He chose the most likeable choice in America at the time. If I was able to tell President Truman one thing, it would be, drop the atomic bombs on Japan and end the four year war for America. Japan started the war on America with the bombing of Pearl Harbor, America repaid the debt back to Japan many fold(top secret).
Near the end of the Second World War, America and Japan continue to fight with no signs of surrender in sight from either side. President Truman warned the government of Japan that he would use weapons of mass destruction if there was not an end to the war, but they refused to surrender. The decision that Japan made to ignore President Truman left him with two choices; develop the atomic bomb or invade Japan with American forces and allies. After careful consideration, President Truman made the choice to develop and use the nuclear bombs as a way to end World War II. On August 6, 1945, the president unleashed the massive weapon of destruction on the city of Hiroshima dropping the atomic bomb code named “Little Boy”. A few days later on August
On August 6, 1945, the first bomb was dropped on the city of Hiroshima. Three days later on August 9, the second bomb hit Nagasaki. Whether the United States made a moral and ethical decision is still an ongoing debate. President Truman was faced with a difficult choice. The U.S. chose to adopt a stance that seemed to limit the amount of casualties in the war, by significantly shortening it with the use of atomic weapons. It was certainly a reasonable view for the USA to take, since they had suffered the loss of more than thousands of lives, both military and civilian. To the top rank of the US military the death toll was worth it to prevent the “many thousands of American troops that would have been killed in invading Japan.” This was a grave
Devastation and terror. Describing the atomic bomb’s after effects does not elicit the use of positive terms. The destruction caused by the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was immense, being a true demonstration of the complete power of the atomic bomb’s life taking capabilities. When the United States decided to drop the atomic bombs on the two Japanese cities, they made a decision to put American lives over Japanese. The bombing of Japanese cities was, however extreme and terrible, justified in the course of World War II. The actions made by Japan and its allies had called for an extreme response, and the United States had to reciprocate with one that would effectively end a war with blood spilt in amounts never before seen.
Therefore, the atomic bombs became an effective and decisive way to force Japan to surrender, which saved countless lives that would have been lost if the war continued. The atomic bomb was a lethal weapon and powerful deterrent, and by dropping it the U.S. could more easily control Soviet spread in Europe. Its development and use revealed the nation’s ability to utilize advanced technologies, mobilize resources and embody the status of the U.S. as a strong
The United States’ decision to drop an atomic bomb on Hiroshima required extensive research leading to its production. The main goal of the American side was to damage the enemy’s confidence, while choosing a target with the highest military output in order to conclude the war (Robinson).The group in charge of developing the technology was known as the Manhattan Project, and was kept top-secret. Selection began in the spring of 1945, with assistance from the Commanding General, Army Air Forces, his Headquarters (Robinson).There was a variety of experts working on the project, including mathematicians, theoretical physicists, and specialists trained in weather and blast effects Headquarters (Robinson). In order to monitor all of the results, the city had to be untouched, meaning the target had to have no signs of previous bombings. Based on these requirements, the designation of Hiroshima for the bombing was not a simple determination. After a target was selected and the weapon was developed, testing was set to begin. On July 16, 1945, the first test in Alamogordo, New Mexico, proved that the bomb was prepared for release onto...
The Destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki The long lasting effects of the atomic bomb dropped on both Hiroshima and Nagasaki were justified by the United States. The United States had no other choice, or the war would just go on, which would be unfavorable for both the United States and Japan. The first reason why the US’s choice to use Atomic Bombs was justified is that it saved many soldiers’ lives. If the war had continued, many more lives on both the United States and Japan’s side would have been lost.
Since the dropping of the bomb on August 6, 1945, there has been debate and argument about Truman’s decision to use the atomic bomb. Was it justified? How is it remembered both today and in the past? The traditional view, which was more-or-less unchallenged for a few years until the 1950s, was that the atomic bombing was justified because Japan refused to surrender, hoping that it will increase the loss of Allied Nation’s lives and force the US to propose a peace negotiation. In addition, a nuclear attack on Japan would’ve prevented the costly Operation Downfall (land invasion of Japan) from being enacted.
In 1945, the war against Japan is in the stage of an end. The American army is still debating whether to use the atomic bomb to force Japanese Army to surrender. Taking into account the views of commanders and public opinion, I think it is necessary to use the atomic bomb to bring the war to an early end. Some people believe that atomic bombs should not be dropped.
Imagine being in a war, thousands of your people are dying, but you've found the ultimate weapon that will give you the upper hand. However, thousands upon thousands would be killed including many women and children, and it could be considered very unethical. However, if you don't use it, more people would die. This is the position America found itself in during World War 2. In the end, the U.S decided to drop two nuclear bombs in Japan.