Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Assisted suicide controversy essay
Assisted suicide controversy essay
Cons of assisted suicide
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Assisted suicide controversy essay
Assisted suicide is suicide committed by someone with assistance from another person. Usually, doctors whose patients want to die assist it, but anyone can do the assisting. The topic of assisted suicide is of great controversy. Furthermore, in U.S. states where assisted suicide is legal it is restricted only to the medical field. I believe that assisted suicide should not be legalized because of moral issues related to the act. Such issues include the consequences of performing it, the nature of the suicide, and the morality of the assister.
Most of us frown upon “normal” suicide, where a person kills himself or herself. In fact, it is strongly discouraged by our peers. What makes suicide any different from assisted suicide? In both scenarios,
there is a person who wishes to end his own life. In standard suicide, we try to convince the victim to think through and not kill himself or herself. What makes the victims who are asking for assistance in suicide any different? If we offer them assistance, shouldn’t it be of moral advice instead of inhumane murder? If they have some sort of illness, then it is possible they may have physical pain. Nevertheless, many suicides may be caused by emotional pain, which can be, if not more painful, than physical pain. Therefore, assisted suicide should be treated the same way as suicide is. Moreover, if the parents of the victims are against the suicide, how could the person do it? Their mother had carried him around for ten months and spent years raising him up. Killing oneself would not be the proper repayment for one’s mother’s pain and suffering, physical and mental. However, I do not think just denying someone assisted suicide is enough. If you do not say yes, they will go to someone else for assistance. Therefore, one should try one’s best to awaken the victim from his delusional state. The immediate controversy is that of physician-assisted suicide. Nevertheless, the assisted suicide of this type should be not allowed too. For instance, even though the person may be suffering from some sort of incurable disease painfully and will die shortly, if a person has the mental prowess and determination, they will not waste whatever time they have left. Assisted suicide is a cheap way for people to find an easy and quick escape from suffering. In addition, assisted suicide goes against what a doctor should do. A doctor should help the patient get better and save a patient’s life. If there is no cure, he should at least try to at least help the patient. Killing your patient goes against this moral code. However, if there is no hope whatsoever for the patient, and trying to save the patient will only prolong their suffering, doctors can at least not assist the suicide and let the patient do it himself. As a result, assisted suicide of any type, physician assisted or not, should be illegal and discouraged. First, the responsibility of such an act should solely be placed on the person himself. In addition, suicide of any kind is immoral and reveals the person as weak. In physician-assisted suicide, this goes against what a doctor should do, being the savior of lives. Hence, the legalization of such an act should never take place.
There are pro’s and con’s to the idea of being assisted medically with suicide. On one hand, it’s not our place to take away a life and it’s completely contrary to what a physician is supposed to do. Aren’t doctors supposed to keep their patients alive and provide care for their patients? How is this different from legalized murder?
I understand that the nation’s history has long prohibited and shunned suicide, but in my opinion this is different. This is a more dignified death, which deals with personal autonomy. I understand the fears that the different states have regarding legalizing assisted suicide. However, other countries as well as some of the states have legalized it. It has not caused mass assisted suicides and I believe that it could be done in such a way that does not comprise the patient doctor trust. I am not saying that I condone assisted suicide for everyone, but it needs to be an option for people. I think that if abortion is an option, then assisted suicide should be too.
My article, “Assisted Suicide: A Right or Wrong” by Claire Andre and Manuel Velasquez, discusses the importance of making assisted suicide something to consider when the patient is in pain and does not want to deal with the pain anymore. This article tells the very personal, detailed story of Matthew Donnelly and his time spent before he died. This article was written to open the eyes of people who are against assisted suicide to show them a case where the writers believe it would be acceptable to grant Donnelly’s wish and assisted him in ending his life. The purpose of this text is to be able to persuade the readers to see their point of view and hopefully get them to be for assisted suicide. The authors hope to achieve the well-assisted
In her paper entitled "Euthanasia," Phillipa Foot notes that euthanasia should be thought of as "inducing or otherwise opting for death for the sake of the one who is to die" (MI, 8). In Moral Matters, Jan Narveson argues, successfully I think, that given moral grounds for suicide, voluntary euthanasia is morally acceptable (at least, in principle). Daniel Callahan, on the other hand, in his "When Self-Determination Runs Amok," counters that the traditional pro-(active) euthanasia arguments concerning self-determination, the distinction between killing and allowing to die, and the skepticism about harmful consequences for society, are flawed. I do not think Callahan's reasoning establishes that euthanasia is indeed morally wrong and legally impossible, and I will attempt to show that.
In the end, morals are the only argument surrounding the subject of assisted suicide. There is no real way of determining what is right and what is wrong. It all comes down to your own morals and beliefs regarding human life. Each of us is given our own life and throughout it, we all make our own decisions regarding our wellbeing. We can choose to smoke cigarettes, consume alcohol, speed in cars, and put our lives in danger every day. This is our right as human beings. We chose to live our lives the way we want to live them, why should we not be able to choose how we die?
The topic of euthanasia and assisted suicide is very controversial. People who support euthanasia say that it is someone 's right to end their own life in the case of a terminal illness. Those in favor of this right consider the quality of life of the people suffering and say it is their life and, therefore, it is their decision. The people against euthanasia argue that the laws are in place to protect people from corrupt doctors. Some of the people who disagree with assisted suicide come from a religious background and say that it is against God’s plan to end one 's life. In between these two extreme beliefs there are some people who support assisted suicide to a certain degree and some people who agree on certain terms and not on others.
People knowing that their health will not improve and will arrive at their death should be given the right to an assisted suicide. Harmful or attempted suicides that result in severe damage can also be prevented by letting those with physical suffering end their life by the help of a physician. Even though assisted suicide is illegal in most states, it is generally ethical. Assisted suicide needs to only be administered and considered moral for someone who has a terminal diagnosis and wishes to die gracefully in order to relieve their pain. Suicide is not normally something that should be deemed acceptable, but since suicide with assistance can help the terminally ill, it needs to be seen as ethical for the sake of the less fortunate with a deadly
Today's society is now introduced to one of the most controversial issues; assisted suicide. Just like in other controversial arguments, there are many people that feel that it is wrong for people to ask their healthcare provider to end one's life; while others feel that if the person is terminally ill and has given their will to die, that they can be assisted in suicide. Though both sides are reasonable many people believe that people should not take part in helping someone take their own life, assisted suicide should be legal because, it plays a factor of conquering one’s feelings, gives an option to those whom are terminally ill or in immense pain, and every human
disease that Stephen Hawking has) 5 years ago. This is a condition that destroys motor nerves, making control of movement impossible, while the mind is virtually unaffected. People with motor neurone disease normally die within 4 years of diagnosis from suffocation due to the inability of the inspiratory muscles to contract. The woman's condition has steadily declined. She is not expected to live through the month, and is worried about the pain that she will face in her final hours. She asks her doctor to give her diamorphine for pain if she begins to suffocate or choke. This will lessen her pain, but it will also hasten her death. About a week later, she falls very ill, and is having trouble breathing.
Assisted Suicide, also known as mercy killing, occurs when a physician provides the means (drugs or other agents) by which a person can take his or her own life. This assistance is one of the most debated issues today in society followed by abortion. Physicians are frequently faced with the question of whether or not assisted suicide is ethical or immoral. Although assisted suicide is currently illegal in almost all states in America, it is still often committed. Is assisted suicide ethical? Studies have found that the majority of Americans support assisted suicide. One must weigh both sides of the argument before they can decide.
Switzerland has an unusual position on assisted suicide as it is legally condoned and can be performed by non-physicians. The involvement of a physician is usually considered a necessary safeguard in assisted suicide and euthanasia. Physicians are trusted not to misuse these practices and they are believed to know how to make sure a painless death. Besides, the law has explicitly separated the issue of whether or not assisting death should be allowed in some circumstances and, whether physicians should do it. This splitting up has not resulted in moral desensitization of assisted suicide and euthanasia.
There are some arguments for assisted suicide and Respect for autonomy is one of them. A competent person should have the right to choose to live or die. Justice is another. Competent terminally ill patients are allowed to hasten their deaths by refusal of medication. Physician assisted suicide may be a compassionate response to unbearable sufferings. Although society has a strong interest in preserving life, that interest lessens when a person is terminally ill and has a strong desire to end life. Lastly, legalization of assisted suicide would promote open discussion. These arguments make it hard to go along with the arguments against assisted suicide.
Issue: Should Physician assisted suicide (PAS) or euthanasia be legalized for patients who suffer from terminal illnesses?
Assisted suicide brings up one of the biggest moral debates currently circulating in America. Physician assisted suicide allows a patient to be informed, including counseling about and prescribing lethal doses of drugs, and allowed to decide, with the help of a doctor, to commit suicide. There are so many questions about assisted suicide and no clear answers. Should assisted suicide be allowed only for the terminally ill, or for everyone? What does it actually mean to assist in a suicide? What will the consequences of legalizing assisted suicide be? What protection will there be to protect innocent people? Is it (morally) right or wrong? Those who are considered “pro-death”, believe that being able to choose how one dies is one’s own right.
Suicide, it's not pretty. For those of you who don't know what it is, it's the