Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Assisted suicide controversy essay
Assisted suicide controversy essay
Euthanasia and physician assisted suicide
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Assisted suicide controversy essay
I’m sure you’ve heard of the term assisted suicide. Well in Oregon, Washington, and Vermont they have the opportunity to participate in the Death with Dignity Act. It has been in place for over 10 years. It’s a way in which you take control of when and where you want to die. This gives anyone taking part in the act a sense of control and peace of mind. Not just anyone can do this though. You have to be 18 or older and a resident of these states. You also have to be capable of making health care decisions on your own, and you have to be diagnosed with an illness that is terminal and will lead to death within 6 months. It is proven that their family feels better about their loved ones dying on their own terms in a peaceful manner. It helps them …show more content…
focus on the gift of life and the good times they had rather than the agonizing process of them dying. Brittany Maynard participated in the Oregon Death with Dignity Act. She was 29 years old and was married for just over a year. After suffering from really atrocious headaches, on New Years Day she was diagnosed with brain cancer. Her and her husband’s lives were devoted to doctor consultations and many hours of being in the hospital. After nine days of finding out she had brain cancer she had surgery to get rid of her tumor. She had no luck the tumor came back and it was more aggressive. The doctors prescribed full brain radiation. After reading the side effects she knew her life would never be the same again. She would have no hair on her head and her scalp would be covered with first-degree burns. Her and her family did months of research to see if there was anything they could do. There was nothing they could do to save her life. The cancer was eating away at her brain; she would experience personality changes and a loss of verbal, cognitive, and motive skills. Brittany knew her life was coming to an end "When we all sat down and looked at the facts, there isn't a single person that loves me that wishes me more pain and more suffering" (Brittany Maynard). Crowley also mentioned that Maynard "suffered increasingly frequent and longer seizures, severe head and neck pain, and stroke-like symptoms. As symptoms grew more severe, she chose to abbreviate the dying process by taking the aid-in-dying medication she had received months ago"(Sean Crowley, a spokesman for the advocacy group Compassion & Choices). She died in the way she attended, peacefully in her bedroom in the arms of her loved ones. John listens to the radio every morning on his way to work. After flipping on his radio one morning the topic was Brittany Maynard. The first caller mentioned “that Maynard’s husband should have talked her out of her decision.” John does not agree with that statement. As he sees it Maynard gave her husband a gift, a gift by preventing painful images being burned into his brain. John points out that “he will not have memories of his beloved gradually losing her mind and control over her bodily functions. He will not have memories of watching the person he loves most moaning in pain, and not being able to do anything about it. He will not have memories like the ones I have—of vomit and bedsores and things so horrible that I cannot bring myself to type them into this keyboard. He will not have memories of reaching the point where he started wishing that his wife, his partner of 38 years whom he loved with all his heart, would die. Those memories don’t go away; they come back in dreams and nightmares” (John La Grange). A young woman named Amy Neese’s supported Brittany and her decisions and wishes she knew about the option sooner. Her father at the age of 61 suffered from a cancer that required brain radiation. He took the chance of getting the treatment, unlike Brittany. Every one of Brittany’s fears materialized in Amy’s father. The radiation ultimately caused brain necrosis; the necrosis slowly but effectively ate his brain one section at a time. Although the treatment brought him more time, her father lost his quality of life. For four years, he was in chronic pain and constant agony. Amy Neese’s expresses “My family and I were forced to helplessly watch the slow, brutal process of losing him a piece at a time. We sat beside him through numerous painful surgeries and recoveries. We stood by him as his ability to perform simple life tasks began to fail—drive a car, hold a fork, move his feet. We watched as he lost ability to comprehend and process information. We cried when he lost ability to communicate and recognize things familiar. We held his hand as he agonized from morphine-resistant pain, and fought back tears when he told us he was ready to go. In the end, we sat beside him in hospice, waiting, praying for God to bring him peace. The process was torture on my sweet daddy; the experience was heartbreaking for us” (Amy Neese’s). No one wants to see the people they love in pain. The family of the loved one goes through a ton more heartbreak and torture having to watch them go in such a painful way. Another young women that supports the Death with Dignity act is Lee Macneall. She is 25 years old and a firm believer that people should have the right to choose. She believes her story is different. She lost someone close to her twice due to a terminal disease. She lost her father at 13 to cancer, and recently lost her mother to lung cancer and a brain tumor. She asked, “How is it fair that someone else can make the decision that she must go through this from start to finish in agony” (Lee Macneall). She feels very angry at the fact there are no sanctions in place that allows someone of a sound mind to make a decision about their own death. Her mom had to endure pain on a daily basis. It broke her having to watch her mother and father die in one of the worst ways possible. There are numerous questions that are frequently asked about the Death with Dignity Act.
One question asked is, are the poor, undereducated, uninsured and other marginalized people encouraged to use the law? Actually, no one is encouraged to use the law. People who have chosen to use the law have been well educated, have had excellent health care, have had good insurance, have had access to hospice and have been well supported financially, emotionally and physically. Another question people have is are you allowed to move to Oregon, Washington, and Vermont to take advantage of the act? The law doesn’t prevent anyone from moving to these states , however reports show very few patients have moved to any of the these places to use the law. Unfortunately there is a time consuming process. The timeline starts with your first oral request to your physician, then a 15 day writing period, your second oral request to your physician, a written request to your physician, then there’s a 48 hour waiting period before you can pick up your prescribed medication. Some people wonder if assisted death is the same as euthanasia. No they are not the same because the patient chooses when and where they take the medicine, the physician does nothing but provides the medicine if you are eligible. Euthanasia generally means that the physician would act directly, for instance giving a lethal injection, to end the patient’s life. Not everyone who goes through the process and qualifies for it actually takes the medicine. Statistics say “Twenty-eight of the 122 patients who received Death with Dignity Act prescriptions during 2013 did not take the medications and subsequently died of other causes” (Oregon Public Health Division). People also wonder what kind of prescription the patient will receive; well it is up to the physician to determine the prescription. To date, most patients have received a prescription for an oral dosage of a barbiturate. A barbiturate is a sleep inducing drug.
Statistics also say “in the first decade of the law, the median age of decedents was 70 years; 54 percent were men, 82 percent were terminally ill with cancer, and 86 percent were enrolled in home hospice” (The Oregon Encyclopedia Portland State University). Before being prescribed the medication, the doctor recommends other options as in hospice care, the patient also has to agree that when they take the medicine they do it in a private place in a private manner. Although rarely used the option of Death with Dignity helps a person regain control over their illness. It gives them peace at mind when their illness is rapidly stripping away options and control. “The law brings comfort to family and friends. Loved ones have the option— a way out” (Compassion & Choices). Their family members like to know that their loved ones died peacefully.
Intro: The Hippocratic Oath clearly states, “I will not give a drug that is deadly to anyone if asked [for it], nor will I suggest the way to such counsel.”Steven Miles, a professor at the University of Minnesota Medical School published an article, “The Hippocratic Oath,” expressing that doctors must uphold the standards of the Hippocratic Oath to modern relevance. Euthanasia continues as a controversial policy issue. Providing resourceful information allows us to recognize what is in the best interest for patients and doctors alike. Today, I will convince you that physician-assisted suicide should be illegal. The United States must implement a policy stopping the usage of euthanasia for the terminally ill. I will provide knowledge of
It should not be up to anybody except the dying patient. There are only four states that have legalized assisted suicide.
...o through when they are in their final stages. In addition, because the lethal medication is always to be requested and not encouraged by a doctor, requesting death with dignity gives patients a feeling of autonomy and power as they do have some control over their last parts of life during a time when they usually feel helpless. With proper legislation and training for professionals, death with dignity could be properly regulated and not be abused. The Death With Dignity Acts found in the states that have already legalized it have been successful with giving terminally ill the rights and choices they deserve while also have specific and strict guidelines. The rest of the country should take these states as role models because it still remains that legalizing death with dignity across the nation would benefit a lot of people who are suffering from a terminal illness.
Did you know, about 57% of physicians today have received a request for physician assisted suicide due to suffering from a terminally ill patient. Suffering has always been a part of human existence, and these requests have been occurring since medicine has been around. Moreover, there are two principles that all organized medicine agree upon. The first one is physicians have a responsibility to relieve pain and suffering of dying patients in their care. The second one is physicians must respect patients’ competent decisions to decline life-sustaining treatment. Basically, these principles state the patients over the age of 18 that are mentally stable have the right to choose to end their life if they are suffering from pain. As of right now, Oregon, Washington, and Vermont have legalized physician assisted suicide through legislation. Montana has legalized it via court ruling. The first Death with Dignity Act (DWDA) became effective in Oregon in 1997. Washington and Vermont later passed this act in 2009, and Montana passed the Rights of the Terminally Ill Act in 2008. One concern with physician assisted suicide is confusion of the patient’s wishes. To get rid of any confusion and provide evidence in case someone becomes terminally ill, people should make an advanced care plan. The two main lethal drugs that are used during physician assisted suicide are secobarbital and pentobarbital. Appropriate reporting is necessary when distributing these drugs and performing the suicide in order to publish an analysis. Studies found a large number of people accepted this procedure under certain circumstances; therefore, physician assisted suicide should be legal in the United States because terminally ill patients over the age of 18 that are...
Assisted suicide should be legalized nationwide in the United States, because every human deserves a peaceful death. Assisted suicide is when person that has been told they are terminally ill and won’t survive, they can go to a doctor and get prescribed a medication that results in death. It’s not murder, it’s giving the person a chance to say their good byes and leave this world when they are ready to go. Not making them suffer and go on when they don’t want to.
Physician-assisted suicide is legal in three of the fifty states in America: Oregon, Montana, and Washington. Getting approval for physician-assisted suicide in Oregon is a long process with many guidelines and restrictions. The patient must be terminally ill, with little hope for treatment and less than six months to live. It is required that they are a resident of Oregon, and at least 18 years of age. They must also be able to communicate their own wishes. Once the initial decision is made by the patient, he or she must make two oral requests for a prescription of lethal drugs to their attending physician, or the doctor that has initial care of that patient. These two requests should be made no less than 15 days apart, and a the patient must sign a written request in the presence of at least two witnesses. Once the forms are signed, the attending physician, as well as another consulting physician, will review the patient’s case and verify the diagnosis and prognosis. If either of the two physicians believes the patient is being influenced by a psychological or psychiatric disease, they must refer the patient for a psychological examination. If the patient is declared mentally fit to make this decision, the attending physician has an obligation to offer alternatives to the Death with Dignity Act, including hospice care, comfort, and pain management. Should the patient decide to proceed with physician-assisted suicide, the attending physician is required to recommend that the patient notify their next-of-kin of their request for lethal drugs, although it is not required (Oregon 1).
Even though many states don’t support physician assisted suicide there are a few states that have approved the measure. Vermont, Montana, Oregon, and Washington are the very few that allow physician assisted suicide. Other states have not passed a law approving this action.. Oregon is one of the few states that allows doctors to preform assisted suicide. Oregon has a few requirements in the law to execute this procedure: the patient has to be at least 18 years of age, a resident of Oregon, and a terminal illness that will lead to death within six months or less. The number of assisted suicide deaths in Oregon has increased over the years. In 2009 there were 59, 65 deaths in 2010, 71 deaths in 2011, and 77 deaths in 2012. There has been a 30% increase of assisted suicides deaths since 2009 (Schadenberg). This shows that some states are more progressive than others in accepting and working with the terminally ill. The assisted suicide law in Oregon does not preve...
Imagine your laying in a hospital bed hooked up to various machines. The doctors and nurses are persistently coming in to check up on you while you’re trying to get through the pain, weakness and slow wasting away of your body. On top of that you are grieving the side effects from numerous drugs, constipation, restlessness, you can barely breathe. You have no appetite because you are constantly throwing up. The doctors have given you little to no chance of survival; and death is at hand, it is just a matter of when. You have said your goodbyes, you have come to terms with dying and you are ready to meet your creator. Now if you had the chance to choose how and when your life ended would you take advantage of it?
¨ If I cannot give my consent to my own death, whose body is this? Who owns my life?- Sue Rodriguez. If one cannot choose when they die and how they go out, then are we really the owner of our life and body? Physician assisted suicide is the practice of providing a competent patient with a prescription for medication for the patient to use with the primary intention of ending his or her own life. When the patient is terminally ill and is in a lot of pain they should be able to end their own life instead of waiting for it to end itself. Even though some argue that physician assisted suicide is not a humane way of dying it still stops the patient´s suffering and gives them peace of mind.
Assisted death can consist of either voluntary euthanasia or physical-assisted suicide. Voluntary suicide is when a doctor purposely administers drugs to force death upon a person, while physical-assisted suicide is when a doctor aids someone in committing suicide by presenting drugs for self administration by a family member or loved one (Tomlinson). This procedure is legal in Vermont, Oregon, Washington, New Mexico and recently passed in California. In 2014, Brittany Maynard, a young Californian woman with terminal brain cancer became an advocate for the terminally ill and took her own life under Oregon aid-in-dying law (The Brittany Maynard Fund). Maynard states, “Every terminally ill American deserves the choice to die with dignity… Freedom from prolonged pain and suffering is a most basic human right” (Firger). Having the ability to...
S. that have physician assisted suicide laws in place. Oregon was the first state that had passed a law granting doctors the right to help end their terminally ill patient’s lives, with the 1997 Death with Dignity Act. Washington was the second state to legalize it in 2008, with Initiative Measure No. 1000 also known as the Washington Death with Dignity Act. The first requirement for both Oregon and Washington is that the patient is an adult which means they have to be over the age of 18. Secondly, they have to be competent. This means that the patients physicians, and psychiatrists or the court, have the opinion that the patient can make informed decisions on their own health care. Third, the patient has to have a terminal illness that is confirmed by their physician. Fourth, they have to voluntarily say that they would like medication to end their life. Fifth, they must also make a written request for medication that will help end their life that can be tracked by the state government. Finally they have to meet requirements of citizenship for that state. All of these rules must be met in order to qualify; they do not meet qualifications solely on age and disability. Also the statutes do require that the doctor recommend counseling, have them notifying a family member, and inform them of the risks and probable results as well as feasible
Many people wonder if we as citizens have the right to die. There are some legal and illegal ways to go about doing so. Euthanasia is by law illegal in the United States. However, there are some states that have legalized physician assisted suicide. As we wait for more states to follow the steps of the other states, we wonder why they have not done so already. There have been many famous cases that occurred over the past couple decades that given states reason to legalize physician assisted suicide. Nonetheless, there are still the pros and cons to why physician assisted suicide should be legal or illegal. It is safe to say that the establishment of living wills, the patient bill of rights and natural death laws have allowed the U.S. to come a long way since 1906.
In addition, the death with dignity act is performed through euthanasia which is the practice of intentionally ending a life to relieve pain and suffering. Since the death with dignity act isn't legalized all within america, it is a struggle among patients who rely on it. For instance, 3 years ago, 29 year old Brittany Maynard diagnosed with terminal brain cancer decided to move from her hometown California to Oregon, to take advantage of Oregon's death with dignity law. In other words, it allowed terminally ill patients, such as Brittany to choose where and when they want to die. After specialists told Brittany that she had 6 months to live, she was in a predicament to either follow a treatment plan which might ease her pain, but seriously diminish the quality of her remaining life, or reject the treatment and enable her family to watch her slowly suffer and die. however, Brittany looked for a third alternative and states that, “I did not want this nightmare scenario for my family,”(www.) On November 1st, Brittany planned to choose to end her miserable life in Oregon around her friends and family which Britanny called the ring of love. Without death with dignity, life can in fact, turn out to be hopeless since the terminally ill patient
Everyone at some point in their life will have to deal with a tragic death. Either the death of a family member like a mother or father, or a best friend. It is easy say how you will feel once it happens, but what if you had to be the one to make the decision? Could you be the one held responsible to keep someone you love alive longer then they originally intended?. Many stories have turned into a media frenzy with the assisted suicide by Dr. Jack Kevorkian to help 54 yr. old Janet Adkins end her suffering from Alzheimer’s, to Terry Shiavo who suffered from extreme hypokalemia and her lifeless body was torn between her husband wanted to pull the plug to let her die a painless death to her family who wanted to keep her artificially kept alive.
any person who has no job and so drains on society, any person who has