Imagine what one can do during the course of his life while here on Earth. This individual can pursue any endeavor during his life and, in this country, has every opportunity to do so. The taking of one’s own life is a tremendous waste of precious human life. What is considered to be even worse is the aiding of this horrendous action by another individual. Assisted suicide is a wasted opportunity in regards to human life and ruins the potential for further life experiences, societal contribution, and self-advancement. Suicide in and of itself is a terrible occurrence for a family to have to go through. The loss of a family member to suicide has the potential to tear a family apart due to the immense amount of grief involved in this tragedy. …show more content…
Suicide has had an ever present role in the course of human existence. During the Middle Ages, the act of killing one’s self was associated with condemnation. Criminal and social penalties were also brought upon those who even tried attempting suicide. Until the Reformation, suicides were condemned by the church as well as by the state. Until 1823, suicides were denied burial on holy grounds; and were instead buried at night, without a service, and with a stake through the heart. The possessions of this individual were also seized by the state (Hutchinson). Now, granted all of these measures were extreme and unnecessary, they were all still based off of the same principle: suicide should never be an option. The thought process that leads an individual to suicide can never be rationally explained. However, realizing the roots of this problem can help professionals aid those in need. Many factors can play roles in the leading cause of suicide. The leading cause of suicide is some form of mental illness. Over ninety percent of people who die from suicide have one form of mental illness at the time of their deaths. The most common mental illness throughout these cases is depression. However, diseases such as bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and others like them can also contribute to one’s suicide. This depression can be brought on by many different occurrences. In some cases, individuals can have a predisposition toward depression. These individuals may not appear to be going through any negative life situations, but still may feel sad. However, the majority of suicides are due to an overwhelming sense of negativity throughout a person’s life. It is extraordinarily rare for one to become depressed because of one situation. In cases of suicide, there are usually several reasons for the individual to be depressed. Some of the more common causes of suicide are: the death of a loved one; the ending of a serious relationship; the effects of substance and physical abuse; the feeling of being helpless or hopeless; and the feeling of not being accepted by family, friends, or society (Caruso). Any combination of these events could drive someone to the thought of suicide. Before understanding the thought process that someone goes through in considering assisted suicide, the history of this unjust action must be read in to. The first major controversy involving assisted suicide in the United States was centered around Doctor Jack Kevorkian, also known as “Doctor Death” because of his obsession with death and suicide. Kevorkian, after being deemed a specialist in 1960, bounced around the country publishing over thirty professional articles and pieces about his philosophy concerning death. His main goal was to be granted permission to allow death row inmates to be experimented on before their executions. He believed that in doing this he was saving countless amounts of money and did not see the harm in experimenting on people who had already been sentenced to death. His proposal was ultimately rejected and this left Kevorkian in search of a job. After going through a string of multiple different jobs in the span of about fifteen years, Kevorkian finally reached a breakthrough. In 1986, Kevorkian learned of doctors in the Netherlands that were helping people die by lethal injection. In discovering this, Kevorkian’s whole direction was changed. His new campaign for assisted suicide, also called euthanasia, became his main focus in his writings. Most of his writing began to consist of the benefits of euthanasia. After writing so much about the topic, Doctor Jack Kevorkian then wondered how he could physically help the people who were in need of his assistance with euthanasia (Jack). Jack Kevorkian followed up his many papers and articles with the creation of the suicide machine that he called the “Thanatron”, which was assembled using only about $45 worth of materials. This death machine consisted of that delivered successive doses of three different chemicals. These chemicals were administered in a specific order. The first compound was a simple saline solution, followed by a painkiller, and, finally, a fatal dose of the deadly poison potassium chloride. With the help of Kevorkian’s mechanism, patients would even be able to administer these chemicals themselves (Jack). Terminally ill or seriously afflicted patients could now finally have a way to end their suffering. This dream infamously came true for Kevorkian’s first true patient. Jack Kevorkian’s first patient’s name was Janet Adkins, a 54-year-old Alzheimer’s patient from Michigan.
After being diagnosed with her terrible illness, she sought out a way to end her suffering before it even started. When Adkins heard of Kevorkian’s machine, she instantly saw her way out of this world. She contacted him and went through with the procedure inside of Kevorkian’s van in a public park. Within five minutes of beginning the procedure, Adkins died of heart failure. As this news was leaked to media outlets, Jack Kevorkian became not only a celebrity, but a murderer as well. He was charged with Adkins’s murder by the State of Michigan. However, the case was later dismissed due to Michigan’s unclear stance on assisted suicides (Jack). Cases such as these, while being under totally different circumstances, have been going well before assisted suicide was made infamous by Doctor Jack Kevorkian. People and situations such as these are the reason that many people contemplate assisted suicide in the first place. Stricter laws need to be put in place in order to prevent another “Kevorkian” situation. Human life is too valuable to be eradicated by a machine built in someone’s garage. Although in some instances the decision on whether or not to commit suicide is fairly black and white, a more in depth analysis of the afflicted patient’s mind needs to be taken into consideration for one to truly understand what is
happening. The desire for assisted suicide comes from a totally different mindset than that of suicide. The technical term for assisted suicide is “physician assisted suicide.” The typical patient that looks for help in committing suicide is one that is either terminally ill or is afflicted by some form of serious illness. The most important reasons that cause patients to turn to assisted suicide as a viable alternative to living the rest of their lives are a desire to control the circumstances of one’s death, a desire to end one’s life in the comfort of his own home, the belief that continuing life is pointless, and simply being ready to embrace death (Why). It is because of these reasons that so many people today see immediate death as a valid means of going out of this world. This mindset cannot be continued to be present in our society. With technology advancing as quickly as it is, a new cure or treatment could arise at any point that could eradicate the disease from the patient. Patients can also be treated within the comfort of their own homes to create a feeling of comfort or serenity. Also, these people need to grasp the fact that no matter how bleak the future may appear to be there is always meaning in life. Precious human life should not be thrown away simply because of how it looks at a specific point in time. Assisted suicide may be beneficial in providing an immediate, permanent response to what may be a temporary problem, there are many more disadvantages to this action that there are advantages.
Let's mention a known name in the euthanasia field, Dr. Jack Kevorkian. If this name sounds unfamiliar, then you have been one of the lucky few people to have been living in a cave for the last nine years. Dr. Kevorkian is considered to some as a patriarch, here to serve mankind. Yet others consider him to be an evil villain, a devil's advocate so to speak. Physician assisted suicide has not mentioned in the news recently. But just as you are reading this paper and I'm typing, it's happening. This hyperlink will take you to a web page that depicts in depth how many people Dr. Kevorkian has assisted in taking their lives.
Imagine a family member being extremely ill and suffering from day to day. When they decide they cannot take the pain any more, would you want them to pull through for you or would you fulfill their dying wish and let the doctor pull the plug? Could you even make a decision? Many people would not allow such an event to happen because with all the pain and confusion the patient is enduring may cause confusion and suicidal tendencies. However, there are people who believe otherwise. This is called physician-assisted suicide. Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is a controversial topic that causes much debate. Though it is only legal in the three states Oregon, Washington and Montana, there are many people who are for it and think it can be necessary. Even with morals put aside, Physician-assisted suicide should be illegal because it will be a huge violation of the oath every doctor must abide by, there would be no real way to distinguish between people who are suffering and the people who are faking or depressed, and it causes a lot of confusion to people with new diseases or new strands of disease that does not have a clear cure.
Imagine, if you will, that you have just found out you have a terminal medical condition. Doesn’t matter which one, it’s terminal. Over the 6 months you have to live you experience unmeasurable amounts of pain, and when your free of your pain the medication you’re under renders you in an impaired sense of consciousness. Towards the 4th month, you begin to believe all this suffering is pointless, you are to die anyways, why not with a little dignity. You begin to consider Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS). In this essay I will explain the ethical decisions and dilemmas one may face when deciding to accept the idea of Physician-Assisted Suicide. I will also provide factual information pertaining to the subject of PAS and testimony from some that advocate for legalization of PAS. PAS is not to be taken lightly. It is the decision to end one’s life with the aid of a medical physician. Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary states that PAS is “Suicide by a patient facilitated by means (as a drug prescription) or by information (as an indication of a lethal dosage) provided by a physician aware of the patient’s intent.” PAS is considered, by our textbook – Doing Ethics by Lewis Vaughn, an active voluntary form of euthanasia. There are other forms of euthanasia such as non-voluntary, involuntary, and passive. This essay is focusing on PAS, an active voluntary form of euthanasia. PAS is commonly known as “Dying/Death with Dignity.” The most recent publicized case of PAS is the case of Brittany Maynard. She was diagnosed with terminal brain cancer in California, where she lived. At the time California didn’t have Legislative right to allow Brittany the right to commit PAS so she was transported to Oregon where PAS is legal....
Assisted suicide should be legalized nationwide in the United States, because every human deserves a peaceful death. Assisted suicide is when person that has been told they are terminally ill and won’t survive, they can go to a doctor and get prescribed a medication that results in death. It’s not murder, it’s giving the person a chance to say their good byes and leave this world when they are ready to go. Not making them suffer and go on when they don’t want to.
My article, “Assisted Suicide: A Right or Wrong” by Claire Andre and Manuel Velasquez, discusses the importance of making assisted suicide something to consider when the patient is in pain and does not want to deal with the pain anymore. This article tells the very personal, detailed story of Matthew Donnelly and his time spent before he died. This article was written to open the eyes of people who are against assisted suicide to show them a case where the writers believe it would be acceptable to grant Donnelly’s wish and assisted him in ending his life. The purpose of this text is to be able to persuade the readers to see their point of view and hopefully get them to be for assisted suicide. The authors hope to achieve the well-assisted
The right to assisted suicide is a significant topic that concerns people all over the United States. The debates go back and forth about whether a dying patient has the right to die with the assistance of a physician. Some are against it because of religious and moral reasons. Others are for it because of their compassion and respect for the dying. Physicians are also divided on the issue. They differ where they place the line that separates relief from dying--and killing. For many the main concern with assisted suicide lies with the competence of the terminally ill. Many terminally ill patients who are in the final stages of their lives have requested doctors to aid them in exercising active euthanasia. It is sad to realize that these people are in great agony and that to them the only hope of bringing that agony to a halt is through assisted suicide.When people see the word euthanasia, they see the meaning of the word in two different lights. Euthanasia for some carries a negative connotation; it is the same as murder. For others, however, euthanasia is the act of putting someone to death painlessly, or allowing a person suffering from an incurable and painful disease or condition to die by withholding extreme medical measures. But after studying both sides of the issue, a compassionate individual must conclude that competent terminal patients should be given the right to assisted suicide in order to end their suffering, reduce the damaging financial effects of hospital care on their families, and preserve the individual right of people to determine their own fate.
¨ If I cannot give my consent to my own death, whose body is this? Who owns my life?- Sue Rodriguez. If one cannot choose when they die and how they go out, then are we really the owner of our life and body? Physician assisted suicide is the practice of providing a competent patient with a prescription for medication for the patient to use with the primary intention of ending his or her own life. When the patient is terminally ill and is in a lot of pain they should be able to end their own life instead of waiting for it to end itself. Even though some argue that physician assisted suicide is not a humane way of dying it still stops the patient´s suffering and gives them peace of mind.
According to West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, between 1990 and 1999, a well-known advocate for physician assisted suicide, Jack Kevorkian helped 130 patients end their lives. He began the debate on assisted suicide by assisting a man with committing suicide on national television. According to Dr. Kevorkian, “The voluntary self-elimination of individual and mortally diseased or crippled lives taken collectively can only enhance the preservation of public health and welfare” (Kevorkian). In other words, Kevor...
The ethical issues of physician-assisted suicide are both emotional and controversial, as it struggles with the issue of life and death. If you take a moment and imagine how you would choose to live your last day, it is almost guaranteed that it wouldn’t be a day spent lying in a hospital bed, suffering in pain, continuously being pumped with medicine, and living in a strangers’ body. Today we live in a culture that denies the terminally ill the right to maintain control over when and how to end their lives. Physicians-assisted suicide “is the voluntary termination of one's own life by the administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician” (Medical Definition of Physician-Assisted Suicide, 2017). Physician-assisted
“In 1999, Dr. Jack Kevorkian, a Michigan physician known for openly advertising that he would perform assisted suicide despite the fact that it was illegal, was convicted of second-degree murder” (Lee). The fact of the matter is human being...
Throughout the course of history, death and suffering have been a prominent topic of discussion among people everywhere. Scientists are constantly looking for ways to alleviate and/or cure the pain that comes with the process of dying. Treatments typically focus on pain management and quality of life, and include medication and various types of therapy. When traditional treatments are not able to eliminate pain and suffering or the promise of healing, patients will often consider euthanasia or assisted suicide. Assisted suicide occurs when a person is terminally ill and believes that their life is not worth living anymore. As a result of these thoughts and feelings, a physician or other person is enlisted to “assist” the patient in committing suicide. Typically this is done by administering a lethal overdose of a narcotic, antidepressant or sedative, or by combining drugs to create an adverse reaction and hasten the death of the sick patient. Though many people believe that assisted suicide is a quick and honorable way to end the sufferings of a person with a severe illness, it is, in fact, morally wrong. Assisted suicide is unethical because it takes away the value of a human life, it is murder, and it opens the door for coercion of the elderly and terminally ill to seek an untimely and premature death. Despite the common people’s beliefs, assisted suicide is wrong and shouldn’t be legalized.
“Having this choice at the end of my life has become incredibly important. It has given me a sense of peace during a [time] that otherwise would be dominated by fear, uncertainty, and pain”(Brittany Maynard). PAS, physicians assisted suicide, when a terminally ill patient chooses to end one’s life, with direct or indirect assistance of physicians. This ideology has been an ubiquitous topic for centuries. Physicians assisted suicide is morally and ethically correct, therefore it should be legal in all states.
Assisted suicide brings up one of the biggest moral debates currently circulating in America. Physician assisted suicide allows a patient to be informed, including counseling about and prescribing lethal doses of drugs, and allowed to decide, with the help of a doctor, to commit suicide. There are so many questions about assisted suicide and no clear answers. Should assisted suicide be allowed only for the terminally ill, or for everyone? What does it actually mean to assist in a suicide? What will the consequences of legalizing assisted suicide be? What protection will there be to protect innocent people? Is it (morally) right or wrong? Those who are considered “pro-death”, believe that being able to choose how one dies is one’s own right.
There are many people in this world who feel they have a justifiable reason to end their lives but are not able to do it by themselves for physical, mental, or religious reason. However, there is a procedure called Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS) where a doctor prescribes a lethal dose of a medication that kills the patient in the most humane way possible. This procedure differs from others, such as euthanasia —the act if deliberately ending a person’s life to relieve suffering —, because it is the patient who decides when to take the medication and end his life. There are many controversial debates on whether assisted suicide is right or wrong and consequently whether it should be legal. Opponents of this medical procedure, especially those with strong religious believes, maintain that regardless of one’s health condition people should never decide when to end their lives. But this controversy raises a question: who is the owner of an individual’s life? Is it the government? Is it god? Or is it the person who is struggling and therefore it should be this person’s legal right to decide when and how to give up its life? There is many views on this question based ethics, religion ---
As I have wrestled with these questions this week I have found that to answer these questions is not an easy task.