Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Evaluation of new deal measures
Economic effects of the new deal
New deal success or failure
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Evaluation of new deal measures
Assessment of the Success of the New Deal
Source Based
1. The people of the 1932 election supported Franklin Delano
Roosevelt as he offered them a new deal. This new deal was supposed to
“Win the crusade to restore America.” The way he says this in his
political campaign for the election (manifesto), shows that he feel
that this is more than a simple task of restoring America, he believes
it to be more of a religious event. He also compares the depression to
war “It is a call to arms.” He does this to add tension to the
situation by saying that this is nearly as bad as war.
“I am waging war against destruction, delay, deceit and despair,” This
quote refers to the lack of state intervention by Herbert Hoover.
Hoover believed in ‘rugged individualism’ and ‘laissez faire’ and he
kept saying, “Prosperity is just around the corner” which clearly
shows that, in his view, the economy would sort itself out in time,
this was not to be the case, as he would find out in the oncoming
years. Franklin D Roosevelt had the opposite ideas to that of Herbert
Hoover.
2. Sources B and C differ in their opinion of President
Roosevelt. A democrat (possibly a socialist) who supported F.D.R and
believed that what F.D.R was doing was right wrote source B. He says
the first thing that America needed to do is “to restore self
confidence” in order to progress in their quest to help rid themselves
from their economic depression.
He then goes on about the physical achievements, the planting of 17
million acres of new forests and the building of 6 million dams to
stop erosion. At the end of the source, the writer says, “the charge
that Roosevelt has been a dictator is not true.” This shows his
beliefs in Roosevelt.
However, the writer of source C has other views. An anti-Roosevelt
author wrote this. He feels that Roosevelt has made too many American
The era of the Great Depression was by far the worst shape the United States had ever been in, both economically and physically. Franklin Roosevelt was elected in 1932 and began to bring relief with his New Deal. In his first 100 days as President, sixteen pieces of legislation were passed by Congress, the most to be passed in a short amount of time. Roosevelt was re-elected twice, and quickly gained the trust of the American people. Many of the New Deal policies helped the United States economy greatly, but some did not. One particularly contradictory act was the Agricultural Adjustment Act, which was later declared unconstitutional by Congress. Many things also stayed very consistent in the New Deal. For example, the Civilian Conservation Corps, and Social Security, since Americans were looking for any help they could get, these acts weren't seen as a detrimental at first. Overall, Roosevelt's New Deal was a success, but it also hit its stumbling points.
In his book, A New Deal for the American People, Roger Biles analyzes the programs of the New Deal in regards to their impact on the American society as a whole. He discusses the successes and failures of the New Deal policy, and highlights the role it played in the forming of American history. He claims that the New Deal reform preserved the foundation of American federalism and represented the second American Revolution. Biles argues that despite its little reforms and un-revolutionary programs, the New Deal formed a very limited system with the creation of four stabilizers that helped to prevent another depression and balance the economy.
I repeat it, sir, we must fight!” Patrick Henry builds up to the apogee of “we must fight” with the continuity to the climax of the parallelism along with the emphasis of the epimone. Finally, Patrick Henry uses the epimone, “The war is inevitable- and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come” in order to portray the severity and the sheer magnitude of the issue at hand and the repercussions that the decision of whether or not to go to war will
According to Christopher and James Collier,”War turns men into beasts.” It is true because many people are willing to
Interpretations of the New Deal The two statements show two very different interpretations of the New Deal. Interpretation I is very much in favour of the New Deal, where as interpretation II is not. I will use source based information and my background knowledge to back up both of these statements and then make a conclusion based on the evidence. Interpretation I gives much of the credit from the recovery to the New Deal, saying that "It gave them the confidence to lift the United States out of the depression".
Assessment of the Success of the New Deal FDR introduced the New Deal to help the people most affected by the depression of October 1929. The Wall Street Crash of October 24th 1929 in America signalled the start of the depression in which America would fall into serious economic depression. The depression started because some people lost confidence in the fact that their share prices would continue to rise forever, they sold their shares which started a mass panic in which many shares were sold. The rate at which people were selling their shares was so quick that the teleprinters could not keep up, therefore share prices continued to fall making them worthless. Also causing many people to lose their jobs as the owners of factories could not afford to pay the workers wages.
War holds the approximate greatness of a black hole, and is alike one in many ways. From times immemorial writers have used imagery, language appealing to one or more of the 5 senses, irony, things that go against what is expected, and structure, the way the story is written, to protest war. This form of protest has most likely existed since any point in which the existence of both war and written language intersected, and were a part of human life. Through the use of imagery, irony and structure, writers protest war.
War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning, written by the talented author Chris Hedges, gives us provoking thoughts that are somewhat painful to read but at the same time are quite personal confessions. Chris Hedges, a talented journalist to say the least, brings nearly 15 years of being a foreign correspondent to this book and subjectively concludes how all of his world experiences tie together. Throughout his book, he unifies themes present in all wars he experienced first hand. The most important themes I was able to draw from this book were, war skews reality, dominates culture, seduces society with its heroic attributes, distorts memory, and supports a cause, and allures us by a constant battle between death and love.
The New Deal period has generally - but not unanimously - been seen as a turning point in American politics, with the states relinquishing much of their autonomy, the President acquiring new authority and importance, and the role of government in citizens' lives increasing. The extent to which this was planned by the architect of the New Deal, Franklin D. Roosevelt, has been greatly contested, however. Yet, while it is instructive to note the limitations of Roosevelt's leadership, there is not much sense in the claims that the New Deal was haphazard, a jumble of expedient and populist schemes, or as W. Williams has put it, "undirected". FDR had a clear overarching vision of what he wanted to do to America, and was prepared to drive through the structural changes required to achieve this vision.
In closing, W.D Howells is successful in his use of these methods of argument. “Editha” paints a clear picture of the men who must fight and the people who casually call for war. He proves Editha’s motives are unworthy of devotion. After all, it is easy to sit back and call for war when it will be the common enlisted man who will die to provide this luxury. In the end, Howells made his point clear. War never comes without sacrifice or consequence.
fight?', as if to say that the idea of war was nothing more than a
Do you know what it’s like to live in a cardboard home, starve, and raise a family in poverty? Unfortunately, most Americans in the 1930s went through this on a day-to-day basis. In 1929 the stock market crashed. Many people lost their life savings; they invested everything they owned in a failing stock market. The country was falling, everyone needed strong leadership and help from the government.
Carl von Clausewitz, “What is War?” On War. Edited and translated by Michael Howard and Peter Paret, 139. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976.
to gain.” And to Eric, “…And I say there isn’t a chance of war…in a
War has always been, and will always be, a necessary action perpetrated by man. There are many reasons for war: rage, passion, greed, defense, and religion to name a few. When differences cannot be solved or compromised through mediation with an opposing party, war is the last remaining option. Muslim historian Ibn Khaldun wrote in fourteenth-century Spain, that “War is a universal and inevitable aspect of life, ordained by God to the same extent as the sky and the earth, the heat and the cold. The question of whether to fright is not a significant moral question because fighting is constant; the minor decision not to fight this war will be made only in the context of knowing that another war will present itself soon enough because it is simply always there.” (Peter S. Themes. The Just War)