Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths and weaknesses of functionalism theory
Strengths and weaknesses of functionalism theory
Marxist in social science education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strengths and weaknesses of functionalism theory
Evaluation of the contribution that Marxist views give our understanding of the family
Being a communist conflict theory, Marxists generally believe that the nuclear family is not nessesary in today's society. They believe that the nuclear family teaches people to ‘know their place’ and that it is there to simply produce new generations of workers and consumers for the capitalist ruling class to exploit. Being structural and macro theories, both Marxism and Functionalism believe that the family contributes to the maintenance of societies structure, and believe that theory is still just as revelvant today in our families as it was years ago when sociologists such as Engels, Zaretsky and Althusser were alive.
The Marxist sociologist Friedrich
…show more content…
This theory is similar to the Fuctionalist ‘Warm Bath’ theory, being that after a long, hard day at work, the male worker (the bread-winner) will come home to his loving supporting wife and family, who will soothe him and make him feel better so that he can return to work the next day to be unknowingly exploited by the ruling class. The Warm Bath theory is all about the stabilisation of adult personalities. Zaretsky goes on to say that this soothing and loving stops the individual from seeing the harsh reality of life and therefore stops them from trying to change anything from the capitalist ways in society. Although, this theory depends on the idea that the homelife in the family is loving and okay. If there is domestic abuse within the relationship, then there is no soothing and loving space to go back to. 1 out of 4 people will experience domestic abuse within their lifetime nowadays, showing that the good home environment today isn't necessarily something people can look forward to when leaving work. This theory also has problems to it when it comes to what type of families it ignores, like single parent families, duel earner families, and same sex marriages if that's based on traditional roles for gender. To evaluate, Zaretsky’s views contribute to our understanding for the family today by …show more content…
Althusser argued that for capatalism to survive, the working class must submit to the ruling class. He suggested that the nuclear family was developed as a way to pass down this ideology through the generations to keep the ruling class ruling, and that this family system helps to maintain the capatalist inequality and expoitation in society. Alternatively, functionalists argue against this, saying that the family enables children to internalise the norms and values needed to be effective in society from their parents, as they learnt from theirs. Instead, of the capitalist ideology being passed down, it's the norns and values that are passed on according to Functionalists, who believe this is a vital function for the whole of society to run
There appears to be widespread agreement that family and home life have been changing dramatically over the last 40 years or so. According to Talcott Parsons, the change in family structure is due to industrialization. The concept that had emerged is a new version of the domestic ideal that encapsulates changed expectations of family relations and housing conditions. The family life in the postwar period was highly affected. The concept of companionate marriage emerged in the post war era just to build a better life and build a future in which marriage would be the foundation of better life. Equality of sexes came into being after...
In chronicling how the family structure has changed in America, it is important to understanding how family was actually defined. When referencing Leave it to Beaver (further referred to as LITB) times, family took on a substantive definition, or the idea that family was equivalent to relative, or related by blood or law. While this definition of family served the time period, it failed to evolve with society. For that reason, sociologists set out to determine a “more inclusive functionalist definition,” that focuses on what families do. “A functionalist definition of families focuses on how families provide for the physical, social, and emotional needs of individuals and of society as a whole” (Witt). With that, the functionalist perspective identifies six primary functions, which include reproduction, socialization, protection, regulation of sexual behavior, affection and companionship, and...
DeVault, C., Cohen, T., & Strong, B. (2011). The marriage and family experience: Intimate relationships in a changing society. (11th ed., pgs. 400-426). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth cengage learning.
In the course of this essay I shall be looking at the role of the
Family structure and stability have constantly evolved and been researched in aspects of sociology. Following World War II, the family ideology in the 1950’s was brought to the attention of Talcott Parsons and Robert Bales (1955) whom demonstrated how transitioning from an agricultural society to that of an industrialization one played an important role in altering family life and structure. Parsons and Bales further expressed how gender role specialization was vital in the continuous of family solidarity. The “instrumental” male father role as the leader of the family responsible for providing the income and support as the “expressive” role which is that of the female mother delivers her contribution to the family through house work and nurture
As a primary institution, it carries with it the responsibility as an agent of socialization that possess the responsibility in ensuring social stability, implementing a set of family values, as well as playing a direct role in child rearing. When employing this perspective to the nuclear family, it allows us to examine how each individual within this family form is socialized with the notion of gender roles. The nuclear family ideology assigned different roles to men and women based on gendered lines. Placing focus on the way in each individual is given a gender role; the nuclear family displays the same characteristics as the process of socialization as it too causes a distinction of a male and female role within the family
As a societal unit, the family institution has become more individualized and is negatively impacting societies future. From the 1930’s to now the family has disintegrated into more and more of a single person unit. A family in the 1930’s was envisioned to be a male-breadwinning father, a doting-homemaker wife, and several children. Yet understand while the Great Depression was rolling the family structure did not change. The husband went out and looked for work, while the wife stayed home and kept the children out of trouble.
Views from Talcott Parsons, George Murdock, Ann Oakley, Edmund Leach, R.D Laing, David Cooper and Friedrich Engels will be taken into account as well as perspectives from Marxism, feminism, family diversity and radical psychiatrists. This will help draw the final conclusion. Functionalist sociologists suggest that the nuclear family is the norm in modern day industrial societies. George Peter Murdock (1949) supports the idea of functionalism. After analysing 250 societies, Murdock argues that the family performs four basic functions; sexual, reproductive, economic and educational.
One of the biggest changes in American families has been divorce and the single-parent families. In the article “What is a Family?”, Pauline Irit Erera argues that after World War 11, is when the major changes in families begun. Women were already accustomed to having jobs and working while their men were away during the war, and when the men all came back is when things started to change. Erera says, “The movement for gender equality led to increased employment opportunities for women, while at the same time declining wage rates for unskilled male workers made them less desirable marriage partners.” (Ere...
Historically, the model family involved couples marrying and starting a family young and absolutely no divorces. However, as time has progressed, the family structure has become increasingly complex, and less “traditional.” The typical and “traditional” family of the 1950s included the breadwinner father, housewife/mother and 2.5 happy and well-adjusted children (Kimmel and Aronson 181). Gender roles have always played a significant role in the root of the “traditional” family and marriage. Some individuals believe that we are born with these innate instincts to assume these gender-specific roles, while others believe these roles have been socially constructed over time. Gender roles allow men to assume superiority over women and unfortunately,
My motivation to research, discover, and stimulate social change is rooted in my childhood experiences. As a young child I grew up in a household filled with domestic violence, which ultimately ended with the suicide of my father. I subsequently came to know a variation of the typical American nuclear family: a single parent household. As I began to study family dynamics further, I was able to see my life experiences in a broader context. In hindsight, I now realize the impact and weight my own mother had on my personal development. It was through her strength, determination, and optimism that I was able to find the spark within myself to set goals and dreams for my future. She encouraged me never to accept anything at face value, including the way our society attempts to define my womanhood. As a result of this, I now question American culture’s classification of a ‘successful’ family and the factors that determine a ‘stable’ family.
The television sitcom Modern Family produced by Steven Levitan and Christopher Lloyd shows the many different types of a modern American family. According to Andrew Hampp, “The show is among the most-viewed scripted programs in prime time in its second season, averaging 11 million viewers during original airings and often ranked as the most DVRed program most weeks” (2). The television show is a frequently watched show and is liked by many viewers. Modern Family's storyline helps the families of viewers by being an influential and relatable show to different types of families. The show is about the lives of three different families that are all related. In the show there are Jay and Gloria, an intergenerational couple with two sons-- Manny (from Gloria’s previous relationship) and Joe, their new baby. Jay’s adult son Cameron is married to his gay partner Mitchell, and they adopted Lily from Vietnam. Finally, Jay’s daughter Claire is married to her heterosexual partner named Phil and they have three children. The show is influential to our culture today because it shows these different types of families and addresses controversial themes such as gay adoption, the different family connections and communications, intergenerational coupling, and acceptance of diversity within an extended family. The family is easy to relate to while watching because it is based off of real family situations.
"A family is a small social group of people related by ancestry or affection, who share common values and goals, who may live together in the same dwelling, and who may participate in the bearing and raising of children. They have a physical or emotional connection with each other that is ongoing" (Vissing, 2011) and is the foundation of all societies. They can be formed by a grouping of father-mother-children or even more complicated combination of relatives. In the primary stage of family life in the United States, everyone from every generation lived together in one house. Subsequently, the idea of traditional family evolved and a married couple with children is at present, often called the traditional family. There are many types of families; however, this paper will focus on the traditional family. It will describe how the functionalist perspective, conflict perspective, and the interactionism theory apply to the sociological institution known as a family. It will explain some of the similarities and differences between the sociological theories in regards to families and how they affect the family members.
Sociologists look at society from either a macro or micro view and the theories that define their work are based on those perspectives. There are several family theories that we learned about this semester. Briefly, Structural-Functionalism and Conflict Theory are “macro” theories in sociology. Structural-Functionalism sees society as a living machine made up of different parts which work together for the good of society. Individuals, as well as Institutions work together, and the family is the key to the well-functioning machine. Emile Durkheim, considered the Father of Sociology argues social solidarity, where people do the right thing, create harmony and have shared values. According to Durkheim the nuclear family is the only type of institution that can achieve that. Conflict Theory sees society as a pyramid with those at the top having more power and influence than those at the bottom. Males in society have more power than females. There is a power imbalance, which could lead to oppression o...
Therefore, sociologists question whether or not 'The normal family' or 'The perfect family' actually exists or ever will in the future. Helping children to survive --------------------------- It i... ...