Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Buddhism a philosophy essay
Buddhism and its principal
Buddhism a philosophy essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Asoka was a ruler of Ancient India and has done evil, but good things, so would you think he is a ruthless conqueror or an enlightened ruler? Asoka had been a ruler in 268 BC. He had conquered an emperor, Kalinga. During the war, he had killed many people. Because he felt a great crisis, he decided to seek enlightenment. After seeking enlightenment with a buddhist monk, he helped his citizens. Because Asoka was remorse after the killings of many people, he helped the poor, and spread the Buddha’s beliefs while still honoring the traditions of the Hindu religion in India, proving Asoka really was an enlightened ruler.
To begin with, after the war of Kalinga, Asoka had felt a great crisis inside of him making him feel remorse. In Document
As the Reconstruction Era ended, the United States became the up and coming world power. The Spanish-American war was in full swing, and the First World War was well on its way. As a result of the open-door policy, England, Germany, France, Russia, and eventually Japan experienced rapid industrial growth; the United States decided to pursue a foreign policy because of both self- interest and idealism. According to the documents, Economic self- interest, rather than idealism was more significant in driving American foreign policy from 1895 to 1920 because the United States wanted to protect their foreign trade, property and their access to recourses. While the documents also show that Nationalistic thought (idealism) was also crucial in driving American foreign policy, economic Self- interest prevailed.
As I walked through the snow with aching, raw feet, the blood, making a trail behind me, I soon began to realize how Valley Forge and this whole war in it’s entirety was driving me to the point where I wanted to quit. It was the winter of 1777 and the American Army was forced to set up camp 18 miles outside of Philadelphia, we called it Valley Forge. The question that keeps popping up in my mind while I sit miserably in my hut is, am I going to re-enlist? I am not going to re-enlist for 3 reasons; death and illness, harsh conditions, and the lack of support and supplies.
Throughout Europe in the fifteenth, sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries, nations were filled with poor and less fortunate individuals. While the nobles of countries such as France and England ruled their lands, many forgot about the underprivileged that roamed the city streets begging for alms. As a result, the opinions towards these lower class people were very differentiated. However, three main opinions stood out. All in all, the views of the poor in fifteenth – eighteenth century Europe included those who believed individuals should help the poor because it is the right thing to do, those who believed individuals should help the poor for God, and those who believed the poor were just idlers
The author targets the emotions of parents who are forced to think about losing their children as result of the war. Moreover, readers are overcome with sadness due to their emotional bond established with the character in the previous chapters. The passage relates to the author’s purpose in that particular chapter by providing a window into the hours after the Khost tragedy.
I would leave Valley Forge because 49% of soldiers died at Valley Forge and the lowest estimate of dying soldiers was 1,800 (Doc A). The Diary of Dr. Waldo also wants to make me leave because there was no ventilation in the huts besides the door. But they didn't open the door because it would let all the cold air in. They also had no beds all they slept on was snow and dirt. Also Later during winter they ran out of meat and all the had to eat flower and water mixed and boiled (Doc D). Doc B would make me want to leave too because in the engraving the soldiers had no shoes and no warm clothes either. Also in the background it looks like I would literally freeze to death. Even if I did desert the probably couldn't find me from all the snow in
Was Asoka an enlightened ruler or ruthless conqueror? I believe he was an enlightened ruler. Due to the fact that he chose to become a better person. Most ruthless people, would choose to stay that way. But Asoka was different. Asoka was affected by all the suffering and death that he came across. He was affected so much that he chose to change himself. He switched from Hinduism, to Buddhism and changed his ways to help others. Like giving rich gifts to the poor, and meeting with communities. Examples are; Missionaries, Legacies, and Edicts.
Asoka’s conversion to Buddhism, affected with the help of his own teacher, Upragupta, was gradual. Even though he did little to change the system of government he inherited, he introduced a novel and powerful moral idealism, which was a moral rule or way of life in the Buddhist sense, as he understood it. He called this the “Law of Piety.” This law, though following the tenets of the Buddha, was distinct from them and peculiar to Asoka. It was to become one of the great turning points of the civilization of the East, having profound effects throughout the neighboring kingdoms, not least in
Alexander the Great, one of the greatest and most successful generals in all of history was a brilliant, patient and often devious man that never struck without careful planning. Alexander made decisions with great speed and took astonishing risks, his success was achieved by his show of sheer force and will to overcome. During his lifetime, he defeated the Persians and Greeks, conquered Egypt and Asia Minor, and secured the Mediterranean Sea. Yes, Alexander the Great was gallant, but he was also malicious. He killed thousands while leading his men through the toughest of situations. He was a man who let no resistance go scot-free. On one hand Alexander was a man who brought great devastation, while he set free great social and cultural energy, Alexander’s legacy was left for all to see. Alexander the Great changed the world in several important ways. He brought to the Greeks a new way of fighting. He brought to the Persians the Greek way of life. Greek culture prospered in east Asia and India. He brought to everyone in his empire a view of the wide world. Three great world religions rose in the Hellenistic culture of the Near East.
Later, Karamatsu went upstairs to check on his younger brother, he had caught up with Choromatsu, whom was just leaving the room. He rubs his eyes, he couldn’t count on how long it had been since his brother hadn’t slept. His brother would get up every hour to check up on their younger brother. It got so bad. Karamatsu had offered to take up partial responsibility which Choromatsu accepted.
Yet another reason why Ashoka was ruthless was through he made people become his friends or they shall be killed (DocE). He says it in a nicer language like its not a big deal if he has to kill you if you don’t become his friend. Ashoka even refers to himself as “Beloved of the Gods” even when he would make people become his friends.
An ideal example of leader to lead and govern empire would be Ashoka as he was a great emperor during the Mauryan empire that ruled from 273-238 BCE. He conquered much of now known India, after a war invading the nation of Kalinga that waged heavy losses on both sides (about 100,000 people), he decided to convert to Buddhism. Prior to this, Ashoka was seen as a warlord, while now he seemed a peaceful ruler due to edicts he had written on stone pillars in central areas of the empire depicting religious toleration, an idea that was fairly new to the Mauryan society, nonviolence, giving his subjects fairness, and they were treated humanely "All men are my children. As for my own children I desire that they may be provided with all the welfare and happiness of this world and of the next, so do I desire for all men as well". These ideas and the empire fell apart after Ashoka died and the Mauryan empire went into a state of escalated conflict due to the next leader not being fit to lead. Ashoka made the
Imagine you are standing in front of an edict, one of the many written in different languages by Asoka. You can see them written on pillars, boulders, and walls all around the whole empire. The edicts are written by a calm, enlightened ruler. Asoka ruled India from about 268 B.C.E to 232 B.C.E. He conquered all of India except for the south empires, for they were on good terms. Asoka became a buddhist when he conquered Kalinga, and had completed his empire. Was Asoka a ruthless conqueror or an enlightened ruler? A ruthless person shows no pity for anyone, while an enlightened person is spiritually aware. Asoka was an enlightened ruler because he was just and generous.
Fear of failure and weakness dominates Okonkwo throughout his life. At first this fear motivates him to rise to success by working diligently and doing everything his father did not do. However, even when Okonkwo establishes an honorable reputation, fear of failure continues to overwhelm him and drives him to perform acts that lead to his suffering. One example of this is when the men of Umuofia decide that Ikemefuna must be killed and Okonkwo kills Ikemefuna even though he is told not to partake in the killing of Ikemefuna. Okonkwo panics when Ikemefuna turns to him and cries for help, and without thinking, Okonkwo slays Ikemefuna with his machete. Okonkwo does this because in the split second where Ikemefuna runs to Okonkwo for protection, Okonkwo is overpowered with fear of being seen as weak and kills Ikemefuna. This is an unwise act on behalf of Okonkwo, and as a result, he suffers emotionally in the next few days. He enters a stage of depression and cannot eat or sleep as all he can think about is what he has done to Ikemefuna. It is at this point that things start t...
As we could see in Khaled Hosseini’s novel “The Kite Runner”, an Afghan character named Amir Jan decides to visit his Hometown to fix the mistakes and the pain he had caused in the life 's of those who stood up for him during his time of need. Due to the guilt he felt during his childhood, after watching his childhood friend get sexually assaulted by Assef and losing his mother during birth, had made Amir to blame himself for the cause of these problems. Amir tries to overcome his guilt by asking for forgives
... reason the engagement should not work out happily when resumed. But, like K., though he thought he was aware of and owned up to his own faults, he was still convicted for his denial and the engagement was again broken off.