Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Features of American federalism
Features of American federalism
Features of American federalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
It was May 1787 in the city of Philadelphia. Congress had gathered to discuss an alarmingly important matter. The nation's current constitution, the Articles of Confederation, was flawed. The Articles gave too much power to the states and not enough to the central government. The states could not be forced to pay taxes and the country acted more like a mixture of individual countries rather than a union of collective states. This had to be changed immediately, thus a congressional convention was called in to put forward a new constitution. However, one challenge that came forward with creating a new constitution was finding a way to prevent tyranny. Tyranny is the possession of too much power by a single individual or group. This would have …show more content…
to be addressed within the constitution to prevent such tyranny from taking place. As a result, a few rules would be embedded within the constitution in order to safeguard against tyranny. The Constitution prevents tyranny through the use of Federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and the division of Congress. The first way the Constitution defends against tyranny is Federalism.
Federalism is the division of powers between the state and federal governments. This idea was developed by future president James Madison, who believed that the two governments should control each other as well as themselves in order to provide the people with double security to their rights and freedoms (Doc A). Both governments had the power to tax the people, loan money, set up courts, make laws, and enforce laws (Doc A). However, the federal government would have power over issues regarding the state as a whole such as military and foreign relations, while the state governments would have power over local issues such as establishing schools and deciding personal rights. Neither government would have a say in matters under the other government’s jurisdiction. This way neither the state nor federal government would have more power than the other, thus safeguarding against …show more content…
tyranny. While Federalism is one way the Constitution safeguards against tyranny, the Constitution also prevents it through the separation of powers within the government. Madison believed no one individual or group should have legislative, executive, and judicial powers (Doc B). To prevent this, the government would be divided into three branches. The legislative branch headed by Congress would have the power to make laws. The executive branch headed by the President would have the power to enforce laws. Finally, the judicial branch headed by the Supreme Court would have the power to decide if laws have been broken or not. Power was divided among the three branches so that no one person or group had complete and absolute control over the government. This protects the nation against tyranny. To make certain that neither abused their power or tried to gain more of it, the Constitution would provide checks and balances over all three branches.
Checks and balances are the constitutional powers each branch has over the other two. Madison’s decision to divide the government was to allow each group to keep each other in check (Doc C). To insure this, each branch would need power over the other. The President has the power to veto legislation passed by congress and appoint judges to the Supreme Court. However, Congress can override the President’s veto with a majority vote. Congress also has to approve the President’s nominations to the Supreme Court and has the power to impeach judges and the President and remove them from office. The Supreme Court has the power to declare laws and executive actions as unconstitutional. These checks and balances prevents tyranny by allowing one branch to prevent the other two from abusing or overextending their
power. Another way the Constitution prevents tyranny is the division of Congress. Congress is divided into two parts, the House of Representatives and the Senate. Every state can elect one representative for every thirty thousand citizen in that state (Doc D). However, each state is only allowed two senators in the Senate (Doc D). This system was created as a compromise between larger states and small states. The larger states believed they should be allowed more representatives since they had more people and thus more opinions that need to be heard. The smaller states thought this was unfair and wanted equal representation to other states. This two chamber system allows an even playing field for both small and large states. One chamber favors the large states while the other favors the smaller states. This means that power is balanced between smaller and larger populations, thus preventing tyranny. As previously stated, the Constitution prevents tyranny through the use of Federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and the division of Congress. Federalism keeps a balance of power between the state and federal governments. The Constitution separates powers between three branches of government, and uses checks and balances to prevent each branch from overstepping their boundaries. Lastly, the two chamber system favors both smaller and larger states so that congress is balanced. The Constitution has been a working framework of government since its ratification in 1789. It has helped to safeguard against one individual or group obtaining unchecked power over our country and its people. Allowing this nation to maintain a more perfect union for 228 years, and will continue to for a great number of years to come.
The first guard against tyranny was federalism which means a compound government.In James Madison's quote in Document A it says "In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided
You may be thinking how did the constitution stop tyranny? Well we have the answer. Let's start of with what tyranny means, that a leader or king abuses their power. How did the constitution guard against tyranny? Well they abuse their power bad deeds. The constitution guard against tyranny in these four ways. Federalism, separation of power, checks and balances, and small states vs. large states.
It was the mid-late 1700s, and America had finally achieved and received independence from Great Britain. Peace in America on the other hand, not so much. After gaining independence, the Articles of Confederation were made as a system of government for the United States, but gave very imbalanced power between federal and state levels. For example, on the federal level, the national government couldn't force a state to pay taxes. To try to amend the Articles, in 1787, a meeting made up of delegates representing the states was called up, but instead, what would be created is what we now know as the Constitution. But how exactly did this document remedy the flaws of the Articles, and prevent tyranny from unjust amounts and usage of power? The Constitution helped stop tyranny in government with a
During and after the turmoil of the American Revolution, the people of America, both the rich and the poor, the powerful and the meek, strove to create a new system of government that would guide them during their unsure beginning. This first structure was called the Articles of Confederation, but it was ineffective, restricted, and weak. It was decided to create a new structure to guide the country. However, before a new constitution could be agreed upon, many aspects of life in America would have to be considered. The foremost apprehensions many Americans had concerning this new federal system included fear of the government limiting or endangering their inalienable rights, concern that the government’s power would be unbalanced, both within its branches and in comparison to the public, and trepidation that the voice of the people would not be heard within the government.
Checks and Balances. Checks and balances is a system that is a part of out U.S. Constitution. This system was put in to place so that no part of government would have too much power. The three branches: judicial, legislative and executive are constantly granting and checking the other branches actions, this is to make sure no one person can gain an excessive amount of control in government. For example according to ," the legislative branch is in charge of making laws. The executive branch can veto the law, thus making it harder for the legislative branch to pass the law. The judicial branch may also say that the law is unconstitutional and thus make sure it is not a law.The legislative branch can also remove a president or judge that is not doing his/her job properly. The executive branch appoints judges and the legislative branch approves the choice of the executive branch. Again, the branches check and balance each other so that no one branch has too much power".
The thirteen American colonies were under the British control until they declared their independence from British in 1776. A year after the declaration of independence, the continental congress established the Article Of Confederation, which was the first constitution in the United States. According to manythings.org, “During that war, the colonies were united by an agreement called the Articles of Confederation”. It was later ratified in 1781, but it had many negatives because it was very weak. According to manythings.org, the Articles Of Confederation did not: organize a central government, create courts or decide laws, nor provide an executive to carry out the laws, and all it did was just create a Congress. This congress was very useless
James Madison once said,” All men having power ought to be distrusted.” Through these words, Madison made the statement that not all government officials use their authority for good; some abuse that power and use it to gain more for themselves rather than vesting it within the people. This issue may lead to tyranny. Tyranny is when all powers belong to only one person or group. In May of 1787, the Constitutional Convention was held in Philadelphia to draft a better constitution. One of the topics that concerned many was how the constitution would guard against tyranny. Madison and the other delegates wanted a Constitution that would be strong enough to unite the states and the people together without letting there be one person or group gain too much power. They achieved this in several ways. Today, the U.S. Constitution guards against tyranny by including a separation of powers, federalism, and the fair representation of states.
The worries of yesterday Eventually, we will have a tyranny without a strong, trustworthy constitution. We do not want to recreate exactly what the colonists were trying to avoid and escape from, which was tyranny. Tyranny refers to when a person has a lot of power, and has a lot on their hands, having complete control, and total control. In 1787 a group of delegates from 12 of the 13 states goes together to try to better the country.
The formal definition of checks and balances is a system that allows each branch of government the ability to counterbalance the influences of the other branches in order to prevent the concentration of power in only one branch, becoming a tyrant. James Madison wrote in Federalist Paper No. 51 that “the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that each may be a check on the other that the private interest of every individual may be a sentinel over the public rights.” For example, Congress passed a bill that would require federal and state gov...
The Articles of Confederation were the first written constitution of the U.S. It served as
Yes, the Constitutional Convention of 1787 was essential to preserve the Union, as the Articles of Confederation did a meager job establishing a stable America. Only a handful of people from the entire nation were pleased with the issues addressed in the Articles of Confederation. This document didn’t unite the nation, but created more differences among the people. The Articles of Confederation failed to properly allocate power between Congress and the states, giving the states supreme control, rather than Congress. This unbalance in society left each individual state on their own, besides the alliances they could form within each other (creating even more rifts within the country). The Congress didn’t hold the power to tax or create a national military, navy, and army, which didn’t allow America to strengthen as a nation. By vesting these powers in the state, the Articles of Confederation technically created thirteen small countries. After the Revolution, the United States became even more susceptible to foreign invaders and if a minute state militia was responsible for warding off these trespassers, the state would be easily attacked. This is just once consequence that could have occurred, if the Constitution of 1787 wasn’t accepted.
Tyranny riddles many forms of government, such as oligarchy, absolute monarchy, dictatorship, autocracy, and totalitarianism. In May of 1787, delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia gathered to create a stronger central government -- while avoiding the tyranny that so many other forms of government had allowed for. James Madison, of one those very same delegates, defined tyranny as “The accumulation of all powers...in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many...” in Federalist Paper #47. The key to the protection against tyranny in the American Constitution was the way in which power was divided. The Constitution guarded against tyranny by making provisions for federalism, the separation of powers, checks and balances of power, and fairly equal congressional power.
The founding fathers of the American Constitution divided the government up into the following three branches to prevent the majority from ruling with an iron fist; legislative, judicial, and executive. The three braches were created by the Constitution: Article 1, Legislative branch made up of the House and the Senate, collectively known as Congress; Article 2, Executive branch, or President; Article 3, Judicial branch, made up of the federal courts and the Supreme Court. This was done in efforts to distribute power amongst the three so that one would not have more power than the other. Each branch has the ability to check the power of the other branches. This power check of the other branches is referred to as the checks and balances, better known as the Separation of Powers. This was to prevent tyriny.
The principle of separation of powers is laid out in Articles I, II, and III, in effort to avoid tyranny. It is a part of a system called check and balances. The check and balances play the roles of the three branches of government. This system was made so that no one branch will over power the other. The three branches come together and help one another by being independent of the other. The legislative branch consists of the Congress, the judicial branch consists of the courts, and the executive branch consists of the president. For an example, when a bill is in progress and the chief executive (president or governor) does not approve of it, he can reject legislation and return it to the legislature with reasons for the rejection. This is a process called veto power.
Federalism, by definition, is the division of government authority between at least two levels of government. In the United States, authority is divided between the state and national government. “Advocates of a strong federal system believe that the state and local governments do not have the sophistication to deal with the major problems facing the country” (Encarta.com).