Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of environment in the development of children essay
The nature/nurture debate explained
The nature/nurture debate explained
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
doption Behavior Has society ever stopped to think that behavior is caused by the way a child’s parent act, what kind of environment they were born in and the way they were raised growing up? According to Sarah Mae Sincero, “the nature verses nurture debate is one of the oldest debates in the world” (Sincero). She says, that “nature is the coding of genes that make up features like eyes and hair color. Nurture is the way someone acts because of the genetic influences the child has” (Sincero). Sarah makes many good points in her article, but behavior in children is not necessarily because of the genetic influences. Bad behavior can be caused by the environment the child is surrounded by. Think about this, if a child lived in poverty, but later …show more content…
was adopted by a more stable family, while living with this new family the new parents failed to correct the child’s problems of committing crime or bad behavior so the child does not change. The child is doing what was first nature instead of being nurtured better by the adoptive parents. This child’s behavior could have resulted from being in and out of juvenile detention facilities. Then there is a child from the same living conditions that was adopted by a different stable family. The adoptive parents of this child taught, he/she the right way to act and taught them right from wrong. This child is going on to achieve many great things in their life. A child can behave badly in a home with both parents as well, a child does not misbehave just because they are adopted. If a child is put into a nurturing environment they will thrive, it has nothing to do with genetics. Behavior from a child is caused by the way they were nurtured. All children go through phases of behaving badly and are constantly making poor choices. That is what humans are known to do. Because of the way a child is parented, it is the way that the parents act that can be the reasoning behind the child’s behavior. New parents want the all-around child with good looks, to be smart and to grow up becoming someone great. They do not want a child that commits crimes or is constantly getting in trouble at school. At the moment of having their first child, the parents are not aware that it is the way they act that will shape their children into the person they will become. Children watch their surroundings and learn from what they see. If they see people in society doing bad acts they will possibly do the same and without their parental figures telling them if this act is right or wrong, they could choose the wrong actions. They will never notice that it has become first nature and before long they will not even notice if it is right or wrong. According to the Early Growth and Development Study, “genetic influences of the child will evoke specific reactions and interactions from their social environment” (“Early Growth and Development” 412). However, a child’s genetic influences do not have anything to do with their environment. In a child’s environment they are shown many different ethnicities. They see different cultures and the different ways that people in society create lives for themselves. They cannot see the other side of people. They do not know every ones story. Someone’s genetics are what comes natural to them. It is what they see happening in public and how they react to what they see that causes different behaviors. This is why children are so fragile in their young years. They see people acting certain ways and want to be just like them, no matter the outcome. Just as if a child watches their parents behaving a certain way. They must think that if their parents are doing it, it must be okay. It is not okay. Parents need to remember that their actions are seen by their kids. Children will mirror or copy these actions as their own as they think they are okay. It is not genetics that guide this behavior, but the observation of others. The study continues on to say, “child and parenting behaviors will show both change and continuity across development, with child behavioral continuity associated with both environmental and genetic influences” (“Early Growth and Development” 412). A child’s behavior cannot be both environmental and genetic. It is the influence of the environment that causes a child to act the way they do. In many cases when a child in their early teen years is adopted, they have to adapt to the new family rules. This could be difficult for some because of the place they grew up or the way they were taught to act before being adopted. Their biological parents might have been criminals, possibly in and out of prison, and if they were adopted into a stable household the child will have to adjust to the new lifestyle. It is possible for this child to change. He or she just has to make the effort. If the new parents create a stable and comfortable environment the child should learn to adapt to the new family rules. If they do not, it is more that their previous environment has influenced them, not their genetics. While reading The Bad Seed, by William March, readers can see that the main character, Rhoda, has mental issues (March).
When she does not get what she wants, she kills the people that do not give it to her. She was never taught that people cannot have everything they want in life. This behavior is because of the way she was raised. Rhoda’s parents were what seemed to be normal parents. The only problem being is that her father was gone for periods at a time for his job. This left Rhoda, at times, with only female supervision. Her mother was quite capable of raising Rhoda by herself, but every child needs both parents present to be taught to have respectable behavior. Rhoda was never taught right from wrong. She was a child that got almost everything she asked for but when she did not receive it, she would turn into a child with extremely bad behavior. If her father and mother would have corrected this behavioral issue earlier on maybe Rhoda would have ended up acting differently. Behavior issues have everything to do with the environment that a child grew up in. Genetic influences have nothing to do with a child’s behavior. Readers can take this into recognition here because of the way the parents act. Rhoda’s parents are loving and caring. It was the way that they taught and influenced Rhoda that made her who she is today
(March). There are many adoption stories in the world, but there is one that many members of society have probably heard of. This story was even made into a movie in 2009, produced by Warner Brothers. The story behind the movie Blind Side is heartwarming. Michael Oher was a homeless black teen that was in and out of school. He struggles in school and this made him want to give up. He grew up in the projects with a mother that was a drug addict and was never around. One night as this character was walking home in the rain, a family was driving home and saw him. They asked him if he wanted a ride, but he refused and kept on walking. Throughout the movie this family eventually takes him in and gives him a safe place to be. Eventually, the Tuohy’s became his legal guardians and taught him what it means to be in a loving family. At first Michael acted out by leaving the family’s house in the middle of the night because he did not fully trust them and still behaved the way he did before being taken in by the family, but he soon learned that the family was not going to shut him out. He began to trust them and began to change his attitude. Because of the family, Michael saw his true potential and goes on to play college football and eventually professional football. Michael and the family’s life were both changed dramatically. Without his new family he would still have been in the bad parts of the city. Without the nurturing of Michael’s new family, he would still be in and out of school and would not be playing football. The way that the Tuohy’s nurtured Michael changed him into the man he is today. Before he was adopted by the loving family, Michael did not know what it meant to have a family that supported him and cared for him. It was because of the nurturing environment that the family had to offer that changed Michael. It was not because of genetics. Every child needs a family that pushes them in the right direction. They need that someone to nurture them and to make them know that they can go on to do great things. Every child deserves that support system and those that have not been have less confident than those that do. A child that is not matured enough from a safe environment is more inclined to do things to get attention, causing bad behavior. Whether that is committing crimes or acting out at school. It is the way that Michael was nurtured in his new environment that changed his behavior. Adoption behavior is not because of their genetic influences. It is because of their environment and how they learn from the people they see. When a child is born, they have a clean slate. One time that they see something another person does they will do and without the correction from their parents, what they saw will become a habit. This is the same for a child that was adopted. If this child came from an environment that was not nurturing and did not affect the child in a good way they could grow up making poor mistakes. When they are later adopted hopefully the new parents reteach them the right way through a more nurturing environment because this is what will change them into a respectable person. Children thrive from nurturing environments and it is the environments that teach the children to have good or bad behavior. It all depends on their environment.
...on the behavior. There are plenty of abused children that go on to lead healthy, well-adjusted lives without committing criminal behaviors. Ultimately, I think human behavior is a delicate balance between nature and nurture although there is no way to prove it with the measures available today.
Nature vs. nurture has been one of the oldest and most debated topics among psychologists over the years. This concept discusses whether a child is born into this world with their developmental work cut out for them or if a child is a “blank slate” and their experiences are what shape them into who they are. Over the years and plenty of research, psychologists have all mostly come to agree that it’s a little bit of both. Children are both born with some genetic predispositions while other aspects of the child’s development are strongly influenced by their surrounding environment. This plays into the criminal justice system when discussing where criminal behavior stems from. Is a criminal’s anti-social behavior just part of their DNA or is it a result of their upbringing? The answer to this question is not definite. Looking at research a strong argument can be made that criminals developed their anti-social patterns through the atmosphere in which they were raise, not their DNA.
“The term “nature versus nurture” is used to refer to a long-running scientific debate. The source of debate is the question of which has a greater influence on development: someone's innate characteristics provided by genetics, or someone's environment. In fact, the nature versus nurture debate has been largely termed obsolete by many researchers, because both innate characteristics and environment play a huge role in development, and they often intersect”. (Smith, 2010 p. 1)
As an adolescent, there were countless times that I disagreed with my parents. Ninety-Nine percent of the time I argued with my parents, just for the sake of an argument. I know that after almost every argument I can remember muttering to myself, that I will never treat my kids as my parents did. To fulfill this teenage fantasy I will need to overcome two giant hurdles. First, my nature or genetic makeup comes from my parents. Also, the environment that I’m raised in or nurtured in is solely with my parents. In the following, I will discuss my views on how nature and nurture both contribute to who I am.
One of the hottest debates is and has been nature vs nurture for years, but what is the difference between the two? Nature is what people think of as already having and not being able to change it, in other words, pre-wiring (Sincero). Nurture is the influence of experiences and its environment of external factors (Sincero). Both nature and nurture play important roles in human development. Scientists and researchers are both trying to figure out which is the main cause in development because it is still unknown on which it is. The best position to side with is nature. Nature is also defined as genetic or hormone based behaviors (Agin). Regardless of the involvement in everyday life, or nurture, this argumentation centers around the effect genes have on human personalities. Although it is understandable on reasons to side with nurture, nature is the better stand in this controversy. Reasons to side with nature is because of genes and what genes hold. Genes is what
Scientists make a good point about genes but I believe physical aspects come through genetics, but that personality development is shaped based solely on how a person has been nurtured through their lives. All children are bad at one time in their lives; consider this, a 4 year old girl throws a book at her brother, and is punished she is put in the corner.
Undoubtedly, humans are unique and intricate creatures and their development is a complex process. It is this process that leads people to question, is a child’s development influenced by genetics or their environment? This long debate has been at the forefront of psychology for countless decades now and is better known as “Nature versus Nurture”. The continuous controversy over whether or not children develop their psychological attributes based on genetics (nature) or the way in which they have been raised (nurture) has occupied the minds of psychologists for years. Through thorough reading of experiments, studies, and discussions however, it is easy to be convinced that nurture does play a far more important in the development of a human than nature.
As nature can not be changed, nurture can be changed. Nurture is the only effective instrument that humans can manipulate. Nurture is also able to create problems that nature has never reached, it is able to greatly influence how the individual will turn out with the varying conditions. On the other hand nature varies very little in the genome at a time. In the book Nature Via Nurture by Matt Ridley, a famous british scientific journalist, Ridley says that although nature plays a role nurture plays a huge role in determining the actions of an individual. On the website “http://www.personal.psu.edu/” the website of the State Pennsylvania, the psychology department has argued that many of the serial killers are known to have abusive history with their parents and a roughed up childhood. With these many sources, it was clear to conclude that nurture is one of the more prominent factors in shaping a serial killer. Therefore, nurture is the major influence and the main factor when it comes to shaping up a possible serial killer, when raised under the best conditions, any possible serial killers will never be able to become a serial
Nature by itself can affect a child’s development. If the child is born with a disease or mental illness, they may develop at a slower pace. For example, if a child is born with Asperger’s syndrome, the child will have a difficult time with social skills and understanding emotions. Nurture deals with the environment. If a child was raised in a hostile environment, that child is more likely to be hostile when they get older. Environment may play a larger role in most cases due to everyday lifestyle, from the city you live in to the way you are raised. If one was raised in a healthy house hold, someone who lived in a toxic household may behave differently.
Nature versus nurture is a long question of whether genetics influence environmental or environmental influences, genetics (Myers, 2014). While we are all born with 20,000 to 25,000 genes there are some that are dormant and some active; believed that environmental influences effect which stay dormant and which become active (Myers, 2014). Throughout Bandura’s experiment, we can see that while some children already seem exposed to elements to awaken the genes for anger and aggression. While others seem to repeat what they saw the adult do, but not with as much force and
Human behavior is a loosely defined foundation for individuality, generally considered to be influenced and developed by the environment. However, recent molecular studies have exposed genetic factors that suggest a more biological origin for behavior. Gene segments in the genome of humans and other animals have been identified and associated with particular behavioral traits. Is it possible that the presence or absence of even a single gene may predispose one to alcoholism, increased irritability, or enhanced intelligence? Clearly exploration of the nature versus nurture argument with regard to genetic predisposition has social, political, and legal significance.
Nora’s life struggle began at a young age. Her father treated her like an inhuman object, and now her husband has done the same thing. After many years of maintaining her “perfect” life, Nora could no longer live like this. She finally stands up for herself and makes a choice to leave her family. This decision is completely reasonable. It is unimaginable to think anyone could treat another person so crudely. No person should be molded into being someone they are not. It is unfair to treat a loved one like an object instead of an equal human being. Unfortunately there are many women today who find themselves in the same position in Nora. Many of which do not have the strength to confront, and to pry themselves from grips of their abusers. It is possible that the greatest miracle will be Nora, out on her own, finding her true self.
In particular, the integration of passive and evocative genotypes along with environmental impacts had a significant effect on the way I raised my child, as well as the child’s response to my parenting practices. Passive genotypes are based on the concept that biological parents provide both genes and specific environments for children that reinforce those genes (Arnett, 2016), making it impossible to separate the two into disparate influences. For example, my child had always been an avid reader and was considerably advanced in her language and socialization skills, which as a characteristic, was likely inherited from me. This genetic inclination toward reading was then reinforced and strengthened by an environment that I had indirectly provided that included a large aspect of literature and an extensive use of language. An evocative genotype as described by Arnett (2016), occurs when the child has acquired a particular skillset or characteristic, which in turn evokes a particular response in the parent. As my virtual child began demonstrating strength in athletics, and was acquiring skills such as obedience and cooperation through her sports teams, my response as a parent was to encourage this behavior, and provide an environment with easy accessibility to physical activity and sports. This in turn had a significant effect on the amount of socialization my child was exposed to, and influenced my child to later become more concerned with the interests and opinions of others, along with her social status as compared with her
In order for a seed to germinate, many conditions must be met. Firstly a seed must be viable. If a seed is viable it require a suitable environment with proper levels of moisture, suitable temperatures, oxygen, fertile soil, and proper pH levels to name a few. However, as many of us have experienced, some viable (living) seeds will NOT germinate, even when given the perfect conditions. In the field of botany, this phenomenon is known as “physiological seed dormancy” (will be referred to as PSD from here on out). In plain language, PSD is like a “hibernation” stage that occurs after seed maturation but before germination.
It has been popular to attribute deviant behaviour to a single cause or factor, such as physical, psychological, environmental etc. There are many different inside influences that are believed to affect the way a child acts both negatively and positively, some of which are as follows : -