Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The idea of intellectual property
Case study for contract law
The idea of intellectual property
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The idea of intellectual property
Article Review
Business face a number of potential legal issues that affect the way they operate. Businesses potential legal issues include intellectual property, privacy, ethics, and security. Legal disputes always cost money to resolve. The money needed to resolve a legal dispute puts strain on businesses. Some legal disputes can drag on for years, for example in the case of Kraft vs. Starbucks a case that began in November 2010 and was finally resolved in November 2013.
Article Synopsis
In 1998 Kraft and Starbucks made a deal. Kraft gained the sole rights to sell Starbucks bagged coffee in retail outlets. “Kraft first began marketing Starbucks roast and ground coffee in 1998 and succeeded in building a highly profitable CPG business, from a base of approximately $50 million to approximately $500 million in 2010” (PR Newswire, 2013, P. 1). In November 2010 Starbucks informed Kraft they intended to break their contract. Starbucks would no longer allow Kraft exclusively to market and produce Starbucks coffee. Kraft initially tried to place on injunction on Starbucks to prevent the breach of contract but the court ruled in favor of Starbucks. In November 2013 in binding arbitration Mondelez International, which spun off from Kraft in 2012, was awarded 2.7 million in damages.
Legal Issue
The conflict between Kraft and Starbucks is a legal issue. Starbucks and Kraft entered into a legal and valid contract. Kraft made an offer to Starbucks to be exclusively market, produce, and sell bagged Starbucks coffee, and Starbucks accepted the agreement. Starbucks exhibited nonperformance to the agreement by not following the terms of the agreement. Originally Kraft wanted to place an injunction to stop Starbucks from the breach of contract unt...
... middle of paper ...
...ed the legal dispute by honoring the contract with Kraft. The breach of contract is illegal and unethical. Starbucks made the decisions that the legal consequences of breaching their contract with Kraft was worth it. Each business must weigh the cost of every option and decide which direction to take. Most companies avoid legal disputes to reduce operating costs.
Works Cited
Leo, S. (2013). Five common legal issues faced by businesses. Retrieved from http://www.businessdictionary.com/article/538/common-legal-issues-faced-by-businesses/
PR Newswire. (2013, November 12). Arbitration ends coffee contract dispute. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1450046726?accountid=458
The New York Times. (2011, February 25). In dispute against Starbucks, court dismisses Kraft’s claim. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/26/business/26starbucks.html?_r=0
Geoff Herzog is the product manager for coffee development at Kraft Foods Canada. After reviewing successful results of single-serve coffee pod systems, he wondered whether it would be successful in other areas. It was July 6, 2004, and Herzog had just learned that Kraft Foods North America was planning an aggressive launch of coffee pods in the United States. He then had only a month to decide whether or not the company should proceed with a simultaneous launch in Canada, or await the U.S. results.
1) Starbucks’ legal case strategy legal maneuvering cannot be considered as ethical. The company tried to use its power in order to weaken the small company that already was much weaker. It is obvious that Black Bear had much less finances than the Starbucks did, and that is why legal procedures were exhausting the small company financially. The maneuvering, undertaken by Starbucks, had the aim to destroy the Black Bear Company, and thus to reach its target in the legal proceedings.
Starbucks Financial Analysis Company Overview Starbucks is the world’s largest specialty coffee retailer, with more than 16,000 retail outlets in more than 35 countries. Starbucks owns more than 8,500 of its outlets, while licensees and franchisees operate more than 6,500 units worldwide, primarily in shopping centers and airports. The outlets offer coffee drinks and food items such as pastries and confections, as well as roasted beans, coffee accessories, teas and a line of compact discs. The company also owns the Seattle's Best Coffee and Torrefazione Italia coffee brands. In addition, Starbucks markets its coffee through grocery stores and licenses its brand for other food and beverage products.
In 2002, unexpected findings of a market research showed problems regarding customer satisfaction and brand meaning for Starbucks customers. The situation was unacceptable for a company whose overall objective is to build the most recognized and respected brand in the world. Starbucks was supposed to represent a new and different place where any man would relax and enjoy quality time, alone or with others. But the market research showed that in the mind of the consumers, Starbucks brand is viewed as corporative, trying to expand endlessly and looking to make lots of money. This huge gap between customers' perception and Starbucks' values and goals called for immediate action.
Starbucks takes the standards of business conduct very seriously. Starbucks “support(s) the global business ethics policy and provide(s) an overview of some of the legal and ethical standards” (Starbucks Coffee) around the world and in every store they serve their customers. Another important factor is that Sta...
Kraft’s Food Inc. is the world’s second largest food manufacturing company that provides numerous food items to its customers. The company is headquartered in the US but its subsidiaries are present in the UK and Canada as well form where it generated subsequent portion of its revenues. Kraft’s Food ...
In this case, there were numerous issues “on the table” that the companies needed to address. For example, the principal issue was to determine which company was responsible for the contract breach; Starbucks claimed that Kraft failed to successfully promote the brands in grocery stores whereas Kraft argued that Starbucks deliberately and improperly terminated the agreement. Additionally, Kraft accused Starbucks of undermining the sales of Kraft Tassimo machines prior to the vital holiday season. Once responsibility was attributed, the next issue that needed to be considered was whether or not to enforce a pe...
Moving on, Starbucks Corporation proves that consumers can trust them because one of the main goals of the company is ethical service, their goal is to serve the customers with less than three minutes. The author said, “Starbucks’ “Just Say Yes” policy empowered partners to provide the best service possible, even if it required going beyond company rules” (Moon). Having this policy shows that the company tries to make customers satisfied. Also, it is ethical to have this policy because service is a key that makes the company successful. For example, if the customer spilled a drink, he/she can ask for another one. Additionally, if a customer does not have cash or credit and wants to pay by check, he/she will get a simple drink for
Business was good, but it was not without its problems. There was the political upheaval in the Middle East, followed by further tension after then CEO Howard Schultz commented on growing anti-Semitism in the region. Their integrity came under fire when certain Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO's) accused them of purchasing coffee beans under questionable social and economic conditions. These situations, together with difficult economic times globally, meant that Starbucks was likely going to take a hit somewhere. Eventually, they shut down their Israeli operations altogether.
McDonalds over the years has defended its unethical practices and those of their franchisees, they have been slapped with numerous lawsuits for various violations w...
Introduction This paper will provide an argument for diversification to be presented to the board of directors for Starbucks. A strategy for diversification indicating the products and industries for diversification and how synergies may be gained. The identification and the discussion of the foreign market Starbucks should enter will be presented, along with the strategy it should use to enter the market. Challenges Starbucks may face in the foreign market will be discussed, as well as how it might respond strategically to minimize the impact of these challenges. Also, this paper will encompass a scenario when it would not make sense for Starbucks to diversify or expand into a foreign market, and how the company will create a business environment conducive to ethical behavior will be assessed.
Starbucks case study: background 1971-87; private company 1987-92. (1997). McGraw-Hill Companies. Retrieved March 20, 2007, from the McGraw-Hill Companies website: http://www.mhhe.com/business/management/thompson/11e/case/starbucks-1.html
Liberal Internationalism is a foreign policy principle that claims that states should interfere in other sovereign states to permit the liberal objectives. For instance, “open markets, international institutions, cooperative security, democratic community, and the rule of law”- these remain as features of the liberal vision that had made radical changes throughout the past centuries. Moreover, an outline of liberal internationalism argument has been sectioned into three models of liberal international order – version 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 based on G. John Ikenberry approach on the “Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order”. The concept of liberal internationalism is “first associated with the ideas of Woodrow Wilson”, hence sometimes being mentioned as ‘Wilsonianism’, the second is the Cold War liberal internationalism of the post- 1945 periods, and the third form is the post- hegemonic liberal internationalism that has incompletely emerged and whose complete shape and logic is still undefined. Ikenberry has established a set of elements that let to categories various logics of liberal international order and classify variables that will outline the movement from liberal internationalism 2.0 to 3.0.
An article in the Seattle Post, describes the alliance that Starbucks is making to ensure that a sustainable supply of high quality of coffee is produce in Latin America. "Starbucks President and CEO Orin Smith said the alliance is partly his company's effort to pass on the "high price" of a cup of coffee to farmers." (Lee, 2004). He states that the high price enables them to pay the highest price to the farmers. Though the high prices to suppliers can demonstrate that money get to farmers with being diverted. Starbucks overall goal with this alliance is to buy 60 percent of its coffee under the standards agreed upon by 2007. "The agreement reflects the growing power of the premium coffee market and efforts to exploit it for the benefit of small farmers" (Lee, 2004).
When I saw this discussion, I couldn’t help but think of Starbucks and the impact they’ve made throughout their 45 years of establishment. I worked with them for about 7 years and saw how unique they were from your everyday coffee and latte spots. A retail company with thousands of coffee shops in the US as well as in other countries, this particular retailer has been able to catch the eyes of all ages as well as locations throughout the world. For example, today college students utilize Starbucks locations to study rather than go to a nearby library. Starbucks is also known for its best coffee and espresso drinks (Latte or Frappuccino) and with one of its delicious espresso 's any student or just a person stopping in to enjoy its lounge area where there is free Wi-Fi is awesome! Starbucks lifecycle has made a 360 turn around and been revamped twice to accommodated the growing market. Customizing their brand to fit more in with everything and not just one thing. By doing this they’ve created multiple product lifecycles within their own lifecycle as a corporate company.