Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction essay on why teachers should be armed
Solutions to problem of violence in schools better enforcment of security
Essays on why teachers should not be armed
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction essay on why teachers should be armed
Persuasive Essay Topic- Arming Teachers Teachers should not be made to carry guns in schools filled with students. Arming the teachers is not a good way to prevent shootings and would only increase the amounts of death if someone was attacking. Better ways to prevent shootings would be security guards, some type of metal detectors like the ones in airports or even door blockers which make it impossible to break into classrooms. Teachers have so many responsibilities as it is like grading papers. But expecting them to be able to bear yet another responsibility to protect a classroom full of children is insane. “That is not what we do as educators,” she said. “Our expertise, our job, our skill set is around teaching and instruction and supporting students and motivating them and inspiring them. It should not be part of our job description to learn how to shoot a gun. That’s what you do in the military, and that’s what you do as a police officer.” Teachers being able to shoot a threat during a threat is so unrealistic. Cops who have been in training for years and years still have an eighteen percent hit rate. Teachers who would only be trained for a little would have such a smaller rate. Some say that the teachers with a firearm would end the attack quickly but in reality it would be physically impossible for teachers to hit a …show more content…
In 2006, in cases where police officers intentionally fired a gun at a person, they discharged 364 bullets and hit their target 103 times, for a hit rate of 28.3 percent, according to the department’s Firearms Discharge Report. The police shot and killed 13 people last year.” The New York Police Department is one of the most popular and well trained academies in the world. Yet their hit rate is terrible for police and just to think that a teacher would get a gun just to miss, and potentially hit another
One of the biggest debates in education is how to respond to gun violence in schools. According to BBC, “There were 64 school shootings in 2015” (BBC). One response to the rise in gun violence in schools is to arm teachers. Even our President has mentioned “giving a bonus” (Davis 2) to teachers that The fact that the idea of arming teachers is even being discussed is disappointing. Bringing more guns into a school is not the answer to gun violence. Most people that defend the idea that guns will “help” keep schools safe have basically three points: (1) teachers will be trained in gun safety, (2) it helps deter potential school shooters, and (3) it will make the students feel more safe. Even though there is some truth to those points, I think that the cons of arming teachers vastly outweigh the pros of arming teachers.
Everyone knows that parents’ first worry is the safety of their children. With the increase of violence in schools, parents have started to wonder if their children are really safe in the school setting. Shootings like Sandy Hook and Columbine left parents, administrators, and educators feeling the need to be proactive towards children’s safety. Reacting to situations like these is not good enough when children’s lives are on the line. Administration has started to brainstorm different ways to help insure the protection of their students. The idea of having teachers carry concealed weapons has been on the front burner for quite some time. As a result of this extreme idea, insurance companies have started to increase or even cancel policies with schools that have armed teachers because of the high risk they are putting themselves at. Parents and administrators also worry about the idea of children getting their hands on one of the teachers’ weapons and injuring themselves or other students. Because this idea seems quite extreme, I believe there are other alternatives that are less dramatic and more positively out looked, such as having armed security guards in schools.
Corbett, Ken. "Why Guns in Schools Are a Bad Idea for Kids." Slate. N.p., n.d. Web.
One of the most eye opening school shootings was on April 20, 1999 in Littleton, Colorado. Thirteen students were killed and twenty wounded in the middle of the day while attending school at Columbine High School. Two armed students opened fire just outside the building, then moved inside and gunned down more students and faculty members. This rampage lasting for just under 45 minutes. The students then turned the guns on themselves and ended their lives. The police did not show up in a reasonable time, which lead families to file lawsuits against the police department and the school. There was only one resource officer in the high school, during this time. He was located in the parking lot to watch kids drive in and out. One of the parents of the victims said, "There was no one in that school that had a gun other than the two killers, and ...
In “Vulnerable Schools Need Protection: Guns, Training For Teachers may be the answer”, published in a 2008 edition of the Chicago Tribune, David McGrath argues that some teachers should be allowed to carry a concealed weapon for protection. First, McGrath states that if a random psychotic gunman were searching for someplace to attack, his classroom would make an easy target. He feels that if he was trained and armed, his class would not be trapped without a chance of survival because he would be able to defend against the gunman. Sec...
It is their job to teach kids, not to fill in for the police. Teachers are not paid nearly enough to be responsible for so many kids’ lives. Establishing stricter gun control would get to the root of the problem by preventing school shooters from causing so much harm, so quickly, to unsuspecting communities. Some people believe having armed teachers could be a good thing. If teachers had guns, it could be easier to stop school shootings.
A good way to keep dangerous people from committing mass murder in schools is to give all teachers and staff the right to carry firearms. Many shooters might choose not to attack a school if teachers were allowed to carry firearms. If schools had a big sign before walking into the building saying “our teachers take pride in protecting our students with the force of firearms” there than might not be as many fatal school shootings. Any teacher with the proper training should be able to carry a weapon on school grounds in order to protect the students. By teachers be able to carry a firearm saves so many lives.
When it comes down to protection, mostly nowadays in schools, we would like to think we are safe. For example, schools are or were a safe place to learn and be productive either as a student or a teacher. No matter what school you are in either public or private, doesn’t matter if you're in middle, high or elementary school. In just recent years there has been a rise of school shootings, the ones you might of heard of are from sandy hook elementary to the most recent; Stoneman Douglas high school. While many ask how to make schools even safer, others are asking if teachers and professors should be allowed to carry firearms in the classroom.
Teachers should be permitted to carry weapons in schools. School staff can be their own first responders. “You cannot wait for minutes to pass, something has to be done in a matter of seconds”, stated David Hopkins, superintendent of Clarksville school district (The Today Show “Should Teachers and School Staff be Armed?”). The gunman will not wait for first responders to get there to start shooting. They will have extra minutes to shoot at people instead of being taken down right away.
When confronting an armed attacker, a teacher would be required to have character traits much like police officers and members of the military. Teachers enter their professions to teach kids, just as trained law enforcements officers choose to protect citizens by force if necessary. No amount of training will prepare teachers to grab their gun and respond to a mass shooting, and the potential for deadly unintended consequences is enormous
We don’t need to arm all teachers within the school system, only the individuals that want to. Teachers in school should be able to concentrate on teaching class, however the teachers that are properly trained with weapons should be allowed that right. This is part of the Second Amendment. The amendment reads: “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” (Second Amendment)
Many teachers very well might not want the responsibility of a gun. Swofford is an example of a professor that has a background in using guns yet he still refuses to work at a place where weapons are allowed. I feel this will become the case with many teachers and professors, whether they have a gun background or not. By arming people who are not prepared or experienced is putting violence as a necessity, when really it’s just an unnecessary scare tactic. The teachers in Florida risked and sacrificed their lives for their students, without guns, while the armed security officer admittedly did nothing to stop the situation.
Their job is to provide an education to the children and young adults within the schools. A former high school assistant principal, Joel Myrick, who was able to detain a school gunman with his Colt .45 pistol in 1997 (Saul, S. 2018). Although Mr. Myrick used his firearm to control the gunman, he has a firm stance that teachers should not carry firearms. He states that “Teachers have to teach, and that’s what they should be doing”, however, Mr. Myrick does believe that providing trained personnel within schools could be a foreseeable option to counter gun violence within schools (Saul, S. 2018). Teachers are not trained to carry firearms, they are trained to educate, therefore, providing training to retired law enforcement or similar personnel would be a more effective way to protect students and staff in
If teachers have guns, who is to say they wouldn't use them against the students. 96% of teachers can be trusted, but how would people know which teachers can be trusted? Some teachers could possibly threaten students with their guns, even use them. Some people believe guns are good for teachers to have, but
Out of the 102 teachers that responded, 62% of those teachers said that they were for teaching gun safety in schools. Of those 62%, about 54% say that they feel that police or trained military personnel should teach these safety classes in the schools.