Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Aristotle on ethics
Summary of aristotle virtue of ethics
Summary of aristotle virtue of ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the movie, Star Trek: Into Darkness, Spock best exemplifies Aristotelian ethics. A logical alien from the planet Vulcan, Spock displays a perfect balance of the virtues proposed by Aristotle as he seems to have reached the golden mean in all facets of the scales and whose telos is logic and reason and his pursuit of the logical decisions guides his choices. Spock’s ethical mastery is displayed in the opening scenes of the movie as he prepares to risk his life to save the native inhabitants of an alien planet and comply with the prime directive. As Captain Kirk debates with Spock over whether or not they should save him, Spock makes a claim reflecting the Aristotelian virtuous ideals of magnanimity and courage, both of which are the golden …show more content…
This category is honesty(vice), in which Spock displays an excess of honesty as a result of his heritage stating that “Vulcans cannot lie.” This is seen in Spock’s inability to lie in his mission report, resulting in Kirk being released from command for not obeying the prime directive. Following this incident Spock begins to try and correct this using the bent stick remedy. This effort to self correct is shown in the battle scene between the Enterprise and The USS Vengeance as Spock deceives Khan by tricking him into thinking his crew, hidden in the torpedoes, are his to take. Spock declares, “the torpedoes are yours,” reminding Khan that a Vulcan cannot lie. Khan beams the torpedoes up and realizes that Spock has had the crewmembers removed and the torpedoes armed, blowing up the ship. This omission of truth lands on the opposite scale of honesty and by lying he is able to self-correct and reach a happy medium of …show more content…
Scotty emulates the virtuous character as he shows in his refusal to sign off on the missiles, knowing that their use could cause everyone on the ship to be killed. It would benefit Scotty to make the right decision so it therefor is in line with his appetite and he shows he is able to differentiate between the right and wrong choice. Therefore, since Scott does make the right choice he represents the virtuous character. Admiral Marcus represents the character type of incontinent, as his appetite is to start a war, which is not in line with reason. He also shows that he can reason right from wrong as he tries to trick Kirk into starting the war because he know it will be seen as wrong by the public and the people at Starfleet. He chooses to try and start the war despite reason, displaying him as the incontinent
Franklin and Aristotle both agree that one can’t simply adopt virtue by force of will. However, Franklin believes that a virtue can be established by making it a habit through one’s actions; whereas, Aristotle believes that virtue is innately established in one’s nature. Franklin describes his definition of virtue when he says “...contrary habits must be broken, and good ones acquired and established, before we can have any dependence on a steady, uniform rectitude of conduct” (Franklin). Franklin writes about how to possess virtue and how actions establish a habitude of virtue. This differs from Aristotle’s views due to his belief that actions result from nature, not habit. He illustrates this when he says “Actions, then are called just and
Analysis: From the Star Trek series, Captain Kirk is very much like Odysseus in his behavior. They are both strong, crafty leaders with a moral code however both put their crew in danger and themselves because of their excessive pride.
It is hard to do the right thing, especially when you feel that you aren’t being watched. In The Republic, Plato tells a story about a man who finds a magical ring that lets him become invisible, and he begins to steal anything he wants. Plato uses the story to wonder whether human beings only do the right thing because they fear being caught. Although that situation could vary for many different people, human nature persuades us to do the wrong thing.
Through books one to three in Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle distinguishes between pain and happiness, clarifying the endless war that men face in the path of these two extremes. Man’s quest for pleasure is considered by the self-conscious and rational Aristotle; a viewpoint traditionally refuted in contemporary, secular environments.
Many times people believe that they can change as they get older but Aristotle in The Nicomachean Ethics claims this is not true. Aristotle believes that there are six types of character and everyone is in one of those characters and no matter what they do they will always be in that type of character. Aristotle also tells how truth is determined in matters of practical choice.
Lying is simply an act of not telling the truth, and this definition of lying will be used in future sections of this paper. There are three groups of lies t...
According to Aristotle, a virtue is a state that makes something good, and in order for something to be good, it must fulfill its function well. The proper function of a human soul is to reason well. Aristotle says that there are two parts of the soul that correspond to different types of virtues: the appetitive part of the soul involves character virtues, while the rational part involves intellectual virtues. The character virtues allow one to deliberate and find the “golden mean” in a specific situation, while the intellectual virtues allow one to contemplate and seek the truth. A virtuous person is someone who maintains an appropriate balance of these two parts of the soul, which allows them to reason well in different types of situations.
Virtue ethics is a moral theory that was first developed by Aristotle. It suggests that humans are able to train their characters to acquire and exhibit particular virtues. As the individual has trained themselves to develop these virtues, in any given situation they are able to know the right thing to do. If everybody in society is able to do the same and develop these virtues, then a perfect community has been reached. In this essay, I shall argue that Aristotelian virtue ethics is an unsuccessful moral theory. Firstly, I shall analyse Aristotelian virtue ethics. I shall then consider various objections to Aristotle’s theory and evaluate his position by examining possible responses to these criticisms. I shall then conclude, showing why Aristotelian virtue ethics is an unpractical and thus an unsuccessful moral theory in reality.
Nichomachean Ethics by Aristotle attempts to define the meaning of ethics and to create the perfect society as did Plato in The Republic. In Aristotle’s attempt at definition he discusses the difference and significance of voluntary and involuntary action. Beginning by defining, Aristotle soon realizes many situations are too complex for just black vs. white terms and he introduces another term; non-voluntary. This leads to discussion of choice and deliberation, bringing his viewpoints into applicable terms, out of philosophy and into everyday life.
I chose to write about Aristotle and his beliefs about how the virtuous human being needs friends from Book VIII from Nicomachean Ethics. In this essay I will talk about the three different kinds of friendship that (Utility, Pleasure, and Goodness) that Aristotle claims exist. I will also discuss later in my paper why Aristotle believes that Goodness is the best type of friendship over Utility or Pleasure. In addition to that I will also talk about the similarities and differences that these three friendships share between one another. And lastly I will argue why I personally agree with Aristotle and his feelings on how friendship and virtue go hand in hand and depend on each other.
Hursthouse, R. (2003, July 18). Virtue Ethics. Stanford University. Retrieved March 6, 2014, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/ethics-virtue
Virtue theory is the best ethical theory because it emphasizes the morality of an individual in which their act is upon pure goodness and presents as a model to motivate others. Aristotle was a classical proponent of virtue theory who illustrates the development habitual acts out of moral goodness. Plato renders a brief list of cardinal virtues consisting of wisdom, temperance, courage, and justice. This ethical theory prominently contradicts and links to other theories that personifies the ideal being. However, virtue theorists differ from their own expression of these qualities yet it sets a tone that reflects on the desire to express kindness toward others.
Modern sciences have either directly emerged from philosophy or are very closely related to multiple philosophical questions. Understanding philosophy, as well as the way problems are addressed by philosophers, is the key to understanding science as we know it today and in the future. There are as many definitions of philosophy as there are philosophers – perhaps there are even more. Philosophy is said to be the mother of all disciplines. It is also the oldest of all disciplines and has given a rise to modern science, both social and natural conclusions. After three millennia of philosophical discourse and disagreement, it is extremely unlikely that we will reach an exact consensus. My thoughts are that a philosopher is basically a person who engages in the critical study of the basic principles and concepts of a particular branch of knowledge, especially with the intention of improving or reconstituting them; this is otherwise known as the study of philosophy.
Aristotle’s thoughts on ethics conclude that all humans must have a purpose in life in order to be happy. I believe that some of the basics of his ideas still hold true today. This essay points out some of those ideas.
It has more to do with character and the nature of what it is to be. human, than with the rights and wrongs of our actions. Instead of concentrating on what is the right thing to do, virtue ethics asks how. you can be a better person. Aristotle says that those who do lead a virtuous life, are very happy and have a sense of well-being.