Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Women fighting in World War 1
Women fighting in World War 1
Women in the united states military gender equality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Women fighting in World War 1
Women in Combat Today's nation faces many problems, one of the biggest problems is dis- crimination and rights. One of the main problems within this, is women being al- lowed to join the US armies and join the combat specialist in battle. This is a problem because many women believe that they can do the same jobs as men. All women will soon be allowed to join all types of combat throughout the nation, but this will cause many changes within the branches and problems within the system.
This is a very important issue because for decades women have been fighting for the right to join men in combat. Throughout the years women have been fighting to be equal. This problem brings up many events from America's history involving women's rights
…show more content…
This issue has become one of the big issues over this year and in the article by the New York Times the author states that "... there ap- peared to be bipartisan endorsement for the decision, which was first reported by the Associated Press and CNN mid afternoon." (Peter Baker 10). In the be- ginning before this became an bipartisan issue many conservatives were mostly against the ideas while most liberals believed that women should be allowed to join the combat jobs. Many argue that women should not be doing a mans job, and that the pentagon and Defense Department made a bad decision because it is no place for a women. Others argued that women have a right to chose and make decision on how they wanted to live and if they wanted to go into com- bat, that they should be allowed to. Many argue that allowing women into to combat job would cause many problems, in all branches of the military. Most branches of the military like the marines corps explained that in the beginning it may seem as it might work, but in the near future they will have to change reg- ulations for women, even though they say they would not. They believe that their is no escaping changing the rules and regulation, but others believe that allowing …show more content…
This could possibly be one of the most important issues because it af- fects the United States military in many way. Many of the affects are two sided when it comes to women joining the military, that could effect the United States. One of these is that other armies could look at us as weaker armies be- cause we have more women, and they could feel more confident to start wars and attack us. The second side is that we would have more of variety of gender in the military and we would have more soldiers to create a larger, smarter mili- tary. When the next president enters the office, they should consider a better system for women joining the military and what they are still restricted on. Also they should consider having a idea in case of a draft that could lead to more problems if women are forced to go or not to go. All women should be able to join the military and do the combat jobs, but The next president should not change it because we still will deserve higher expectations from the people would would be a the front lines dealing with the the combat, and infantry that they have never got to do. Women beginning to be allowed to join the combat jobs are a amazing new achievement for the United States and its army, but they will be heavily modifying the rule and regulations of the problem. Marco Rubio's plan would
The military is trying to find new ways to recognize the fact that women now fight in the country’s wars. In 2011 the Military Leadership Diversity Commission recommended that the Department of Defense remove all combat restrictions on women. Although many jobs have been opened for women in the military, there is still 7.3 percent of jobs that are closed to them. On February 9, 2012, George Little announced that the Department of Defense would continue to reduce the restrictions that were put on women’s roles. The argument that “women are not physically fit for combat” is the most common and well-researched justification for their exclusion from fighting units. It has been proven if women go through proper training and necessary adaptations, they can complete the same physical tasks as any man. Though there seem to be many reasons from the exclusion of women in the military, the main ones have appeared to be that they do not have the strength to go through combat, would be a distraction to the men, and that they would interrupt male bonding and group
Women should be allowed in combat roles in the armed forces because they are just as capable as men. To begin, women such as Shaye Haver and Kristen Griest, graduates of the Fort Benning Ranger School, have shown that they can meet the same physical requirements as men. Nevertheless, these women still weren’t allowed to serve in combat positions despite the rigorous training they completed that involved grueling obstacles they had to complete all while carrying 100-pound gear. Does that make any sense to you? It didn’t to me and it certainly didn’t to women like Sgt. Patricia A. Bradford who said “If you have to be able to lift a certain amount of weight in order to do a certain job, then the weight is not going to know whether you’re male or female.” (Women at Arms: On the Ground.). In fact, in some instances women have proved to be even more
With society’s past and present it is apparent that women are still not equal even if they have the title. Men are observably stronger and have a different mentality in situations than women. This is not to say that women should not be in the military but they should have the choice that way they can accept the responsibility and train themselves mentally and physically to achieve the responsibility and respect needed to fight for our country.
The most recent debate questions a women’s engagement in combat. What distinguishes some positions as being acceptable while others are not? Who has the authority to approve exceptions, and what exceptions have been made? On May 13, 2011, a bill placed before the House of Representatives addressed the issues to “repeal the ground combat exclusion policy for female members” (HR 1928).
Women and the Draft Imagine a big war that has suddenly broken out between America and another country. The military suddenly realizes that in order to better their army and be stronger, they need more people to join and fight alongside them. The military decides their needs are drafted. However, men are the only ones eligible to be apart of the draft. Should this be something that should be changed with the military?
Many women around the world have big responsibilities in the military, and although some people may disagree, I believe they can handle anything a man can handle when it comes to being on the battlefield. Some people think that women should not be able to fight in the military, where as other people think they should be able to fight in the military. Each supporter and non-supporter has their own reasons. Some of the reasons for the non-supporters are because of their gender. They think that because they are women, they cannot handle the challenges that being on the battlefield brings. Women are willing to fight, and they know what can happen, they know exactly what can happen. They are willing to fight for their country, and I believe they should be able to. The men that fight for our country are against women fighting in combat. They believe that women are not capable of doing what they do to defend and fight for our country. The men feel that they cannot trust women to help back them up at war simply because of the fact that they are women.
The argument ‘Women in Combat for Wars Without End’ by Jack Kenny, argues that women pose as high risk members in the military. Kenny argues that there are far too many complications that come with women being a part of the military, and that the United States should not provide women with access to joining the military. His reasoning is based upon the weaseling the military will have to undergo to accommodate women, and that it's just not worth the trouble. Kenny’s argument is logical in that he provides instances and examples that make sense to use to support his opinion. Not only that, but he also offers a sound argument.
Ruby, J. (2005, November 1). Women in Combat Roles: Is That the Question?. Off Our Backs,35, 36.
For the past 16 years both male and female Soldiers have been fighting side by side in our nations wars. In many aspects due to being unable to keep up or have the strength to keep up with their jobs many Soldiers have fell short in being able to complete task required by the MOS they carry. This starts to implement shortage in the work force and not being as proficient in their military jobs. Issues like these weakened the Army at the unit level and possibly causing a chain reaction due to others picking up the slack and them becoming overwhelmed or possibly getting
Many agree, that in certain military occupations, women can function at the same level as men. The controversy about having women fighting with men in wars is the fact that they have a different physical structure, deal with stress and emotions differently , are more susceptible to injury and just don't have the killer instinct necessary to get the job done. Although the last statement might appear to be a stereotype, most women would not be capable of supporting the demanding rigors of war-like situations. It would be a great mistake to allow women in these stressful and dangerous situations.
Despite the recent strides women have made in becoming fully integrated into the United States Military, they still face daily opposition from those who perceive women as the weaker, more fragile gender. *not weak, not sexual objects, not an obstacle Possibly the most popular argument for limiting women’s abilities to serve in the military is that women are unable to meet the same physical standards as men. It is argued that the physical differences between men and women automatically place women behind men in the training process.
It is known that any effective military must be founded on cohesion with each and every member greatly respecting and trusting the other completely. However, this is not the case by allowing women since most men will not trust women as able to achieve combat’s physical demands Despite all odds, the role of women in the military is highly valued especially considering that more than 40,000 women participated in the US war against Iraq. This saw a turning point in the fact that women are not to be offered positions in the frontlines. It also provides an argument that women are not recruited in the military on an equal rights basis but on an occupational specialties
Many people think that women should serve in combat for these reasons. Women create diversity and diversity is good, and it should be fair. If women can meet the standards then they should be allowed to join. However, others disagree about women in the military. They believe that allowing
Across the history, women Suffer from luck of their right. Culture and civilization was not respect women and put them in the lower layer in their social pyramid. Kill them were they alive, while other give them a life with a lot of misery and obstacle, which is the same thing or killing them better than these life . At the few previous centuries, the world growth and become more opening. people understanding that they are needing women in a lot of job outside their home as men. Sadly, when we came to combat sector, we stop thinking logically. It is men major one hundred percent . If we look to the book (1001 things everyone should know about women's history) which written by Constance Jones (2000) we can find that only 88013 women among history had the ability to take part in military by give a variety of services. Some country actually these day try to make it happen. For instance the first country was allowed women in military was Norway around 1985. Then, it followed by thirteen other countries. It still small percentage compared with the world. It is the right of women to join army and take part in combat, because they are capable as men in adapting with situation. Also, they have equally amount in cerebration and they have the right to decide their own destiny.
Should women be allowed in the military? My answer was at first a resounding “no.” However, once I started my research, my opinion changed. In 1948, Congress passed the combat exclusion law that prohibited women in the Air Force, Marines, and Navy to hold combat positions; however, the Army can assign these duties as they see fit (Schroeder). Some people assume that Americans are not ready to see a woman wounded or killed in war; however, there are female police officers that are wounded or killed daily (Schroeder). How can we rationalize that a woman has the right to die protecting our local communities but not our country? If a person chooses to be in a combat field, and can pass the physical demands required, gender should not be an issue. The arguments of physical differences and cohesion among the troops are valid arguments but not substantial enough to prevent women from serving in frontline combat roles within the military.