Arguments Against Universal Healthcare

454 Words1 Page

Universal health care is an on going debate that we still cannot decide whether or not to be for or against. In the article for universal healthcare states that we should use it because it is a constitutional right because citizens are granted life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. the argument against universal healthcare states that it can increase our countries debt. In conclusion if we were to have universal healthcare it could either help our country immensely or not help at all. In the argument for universal healthcare states that it is a constitutional right. In the preamble to the constitution it states that all citizens are granted life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. If citizens did not receive universal health care then they would not be granted their constitutional rights because healthcare would be under life and the pursuit of happiness. another argument for universal healthcare is according to a 2009 study from Harvard researchers universal healthcare could actually save lives because lack of health insurance is associated with as many as 44,789 deaths. They also found that 13,000 deaths that occur each year with people within the 55-64 year range were due to lack of health insurance. People also argue that we could have more entrepreneurs except people do not want to leave their jobs because they will lose their In 2012 without universal healthcare medicaid and children's healthcare took up about 21%of the nations federal budget. The increase of universal healthcare could increase the wait time for medical services, medicaid is an example of a federally funded single payer health care system, according to a 2012 GAO report 9.4% medicaid beneficiaries had trouble obtaining necessary care due to longer waits. in conclusion universal health care would not be beneficial over all because it can cause just as many issues as it helps

Open Document