Arguments Against Universal Healthcare

1722 Words4 Pages

Martin Luther King once said, “Of all the forms of inequality, injustice to health is the most shocking and inhumane of them all.” From the moment people walk into a healthcare facility a bill begins to develop, getting the care people need is a privilege in modern society. A solution, universal healthcare coverage where your health is valued in your wallet. It means never having to choose between medical treatment and financial ruin. It is about ensuring everyone, regardless of their income or background, has access to the care they need to thrive. We all benefit from a healthier, more resilient community in a society where health is a right, not a privilege. Universal healthcare is not just a dream; it is a practical solution for a brighter, healthier future. Although some say that universal healthcare will not be effective, …show more content…

Health is not equitable globally and can be seen in the World Health Organization article, “coverage of reproductive, maternal, child and adolescent health services tends to be higher among those who are richer, more educated, and living in urban areas, especially in low-income countries” (Universal Health Coverage). Universal healthcare could address this gap by ensuring that everyone, regardless of socioeconomic status or location, has access to these vital services. By leveling the playing field and providing equitable healthcare coverage, universal healthcare can improve outcomes for all individuals, regardless of their background or income. While some may argue against the effectiveness of universal healthcare, they often overlook the significant benefits it can offer to a vast portion of the population. For instance, universal healthcare can alleviate the financial burden associated with life-changing treatments, ensuring that individuals receive the necessary care regardless of their financial

Open Document