Arguments Against Structural Functionalism

Sociology is a science with a diversity of topics to discuss about; however the purpose of this paper is to give a brief definition and a personal explanation of the three ways to view the world sociologically under Structural Functionalism, The Conflict Theory, and Symbolic Interactionism. When defining Structural Functionalism, Robert K. Merton defines this concept as the way that society function/work together as a whole; he particularly specify functions as the actions of humans that could bring beneficial consequences. His view for this perspective was to keep social systems in balance by either manifest or latent functions. The manifest function is intended to help people by advocating in favor to whatever is observed to be needed within the social groups, and to reward in order to see it happen, the outcome should have a positive effect on society. The latent functions can be described as the unexpected consequences of the manifest functions, and have a negative effect on society. In summary, this way to view the world examines the functions and dysfunctions of any social group, an entire society or even a small group for the purpose to understand the core of the problem in order to help it to function properly.

He passionately trusted that workers who suffered and were exploited by abusive employers needed to rebel against those who had the power. He believed that if the mistreated workers defy the rules of those in charge, they would eventually acquire a better treatment and benefits. In summary, the conflict theory actually has an impact to this day because many social groups actually fight to be treated equally as well as to have certain benefits in society. However, as workers today, we can enjoy benefits thanks to those who rebelled in the past against