Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What are the benefits and the potential dangers of police discretion
Factors influencing police discretion
What are the benefits and the potential dangers of police discretion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
3) Police discretion is an official action by a criminal justice official based on that individual’s judgment about the best course of action. This is not limited to patrol officers deciding whether or not to arrest someone, but is used by officers at all different ranks in making discretionary decisions about a wide range of actions. Even though all these officers use discretion, the lowest ranking employees, the patrol officers, exercise the greatest amount of it. The significance of the concept police discretion is that it decreases as you move up the organizational hierarchy, unlike most organizations where the crucial decisions are made at the top of the organization, here they are made at the bottom. Patrol officers have been described …show more content…
The officer’s beliefs can cause them to deny due process to the people they suspect are drug dealers, prostitutes, and pimps by deliberately harassing them, chasing the individuals out of the neighborhood rather than arresting them. Biases can cause officers to misuse discretion by discriminating against racial or ethnic minorities by racial profiling in actions like traffic stops and stop and frisks. Each officers’ past experiences also affect their use of discretion. If they have always had poor personnel management, they might not have been provided clear guidelines regarding how to handle different situations or have had clear performance standards. Without having these there is no regulation of discretion and they might not know the best ways to handle these different situations. It would also be impossible to fairly evaluate each officer’s performance without any set guidelines or regulations. Officers can also misuse discretion by making decisions that are inconsistent with the policies of the …show more content…
An interrogation is an interaction between police officers and a suspect and an interview could be with a witness, victim, or anybody else who might have information they need. A suspect can even just be interviewed without being interrogated. Officers conducting these interviews and interrogations must consider what they want from the conversation to decide how to conduct themselves and what style to use during the interaction. If the point of talking to this person is to simply get more information than it is an interview. An interview is typically less formal and has less accusatory conversation than an interrogation because its main point it to gain more information about what the person saw or knows that might help them. An interrogation is formal, normally taken place once the suspect is in custody, and designed to get a suspect to
Decision Making – Police officers have considerable decision making powers at their own discretion. This is true for low ranki...
How prevalent is police discretion and why does it exist? Can discretion be eliminated? Should it be? Due Date March 11 2005
Police officers have a great amount of discretion. Since they are not always supervised and on patrol they choose which cases should be process and which one should just be not. Police discretion is the most important part because it determines the outcomes of the interaction between the police and the juvenile. Krisberg and Austin noted that police have five basic options in deciding what course of action to pursue with juveniles. The first one would be release, accompanied by a warning to the juvenile. The second one would be release, accompanied by an official report. The third one would be Station adjustment. Which include release to parent accompanied by an official reprimand, referral to a community youth agency, or referral to a public or private social welfare or mental health agency. Fourth would be Referral to juvenile court without detention and last referral to the juvenile court with detention.
Discuss the differences between the terms interview and interrogation. Interviewing is talking to people, who are not suspects in a crime but who knows something and knows who is involved in the crime. Also getting their information, and asking questions to them, and knowing when to translate or interpret. The main people involved when getting information at a crime scene is the witnesses, criminal and the accuser (Orthman, Hess, 2013). Interrogation questioning of the suspects, once the suspect is known of their identity and where they reside the person who is the participant of the crime could make a statement, confession, refusal, corroborated with self-supporting documentation that could yield a guilty allegation or it could gather a determining guilt (Orthman, Hess, 2013).
Over the years, this country has witnessed many cases of police brutality. It has become a controversial topic among communities that have seen police brutality take place in front of their homes. Officers are faced with many threatening situations everyday, forcing them to make split second decisions and to expect the worst and hope for the best. Police officers are given the power to take any citizens rights away and even their lives. With that kind of power comes responsibility, that’s one major concern with the amount of discretion officers have when to use force or when to use lethal force.
Individual prejudices and perceptions of groups such as minorities and homosexuals can influence their decision making. If these prejudicial attitudes toward groups affect decisions made by officers those groups may not receive the same protections as other citizens. This is discrimination, which can take the form of either enforcing the law differently or with holding protections from particular individuals. Additionally, racial profiling occurs when a police officer make a stop based on race or ethnicity. Pretext stop refers to the practice of police officers to use minor traffic violations to stop an individual and looks for other evidence of wrongdoing, often by a search. They could be viewed as discrimination based on their context.
In law enforcement, discretion is left up to each police officer to make responsible and reasonable decisions on situations while in the field. A police officer will have no choice but to use discretion in certain situations and make decisions on what type of force or punishment is necessary for the situations. Many people in the society always believe that police officers can make any decision they wish to at any time while working. This is very wrong because there are situations whereby a police officer or even the chief of police has no other choice, but to follow the law in making decisions. The role of the police administrator is double challenging because, he/she must determine how best to use discretion as well as encourage or dissuade discretion by subordinate members ...
The degree of force that officers use is heavily influenced by police discretion in real-world situations rather than espoused by a certain agenda. Discretion can be classified into four different categories where administrators, the community, and the individual police officer exercise differing degrees of influence in decision-making. What is needed to help officer discretion is a central ethos that will guide discretion when all other rules fail to help.
Officers are able to use discretion in many situations that their morals would guide them in. They have the right to pull a person over with probable cause or a violation and they can choose whether to give them a ticket, a warning, or nothing, depending on the situation.
Police discretionary practices vary from officer to officer and every officer is differently trained by departments. Without the proper use of discretion out on the field, police officers are left open for legal suit actions however, if the officers are trained and exercising the use of discretion in a good manner, each individual officer can be held accountable. The second disadvantage of use of police discretion is that it allows the police officers to have too much power on making decisions which can affect the life, safety or liberty of an individual (Bargen, 2005). Police discretion presents a clear danger to society because the average officer can make a poor decision and affect the life of a person or persons. If discretion in law enforcement is used in a wrongful manner, it has great potential for being abused out of the field. Discretion allows police officers to “perform a duty or refrain from taking action” (Gaines & Kappeler, 2003, p. 251). Police officers are supposed to enforce equality under the law, people in society all should have equal rights and should be treated the same. However, discretion allows police officers to misuse it by treating offenders of different genders, race, class, ethnicity, religion, age and more inappropriately (Pepinsky, 1984). Law enforcement officers are
Police discretion is defined as an authority given to police officers to make judgment calls, as to whether or not they will follow policing statues, or allow someone to leave with a warning. According to the text, discretion occurs at every level of decision making within the criminal justice process, and how it is used can affect other components within the system.
Laws and procedures are the most common basis for officers choosing not to allow offenders to remain free based on their discretion, a study by Mendias and Kehoe (2006) has found. The study found that laws or responsibilities were the main reason for a decision to suspend discretion in eighty-two percent of cases involving an arrest. The study also found that keeping the peace and procedural implications were the primary justifications for ex...
...rsation among researchers. The problem I see with the topic of conversation is there is not a lot of research done on the actual affects of the individual discretion of each officer compared to a department that has been educated in following policies more than personal discretion. In fact, from what I saw there is not much research on the effects of discretion at all. It seems like it is a topic that is overlooked when researching the effectiveness of a department. I feel like before more solutions are found on how to correct the problem of discretion, more research needs to be done on how discretion plays a role in every day policing. Until this research is conducted, all the articles published are on theories of discretion causing problems, and all of the solutions mentioned are methods to correct a problem that has not even been proven to be an issue yet.
There are several ethical issues that surround police corruption and discretion. Police corruption is defined as police misconduct. This occurs when police officers break their social contract by abusing their authority for personal advantages, department advances, or both. According to social contract theory, police officers are obligated to follow the code of ethics and moral standards of the criminal justice system. Police discretion is defined as the power to make decisions as to whether or not to follow police procedure and protocol, or give someone a
Police decisions can affect life, liberty, and property, and as guardians of the interests of the public, police must maintain high standards of integrity. Police discretion concerning how to act in a given situation can often lead to ethical misconduct (Banks 29).