Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The gun control debate in America
Modern debates on gun control
Gun debate america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
What is federalism? To most people (especially to the conservatives), federalism is basically the taking away of individual rights. Now, what is coercive federalism? Coercive federalism is simply a strong government that exercises tight control on the states. How does the government take a tight control on states? The government takes control by taking away an individual’s rights. This is what a coercive federalism means, and this is the now the type of government America has. However, it hasn’t always been this way; before the American government became a coercive federalism, it was a cooperative federalism. A cooperative federalism is where the government includes the states’ ideas when trying to solve a common problem. When a cooperative …show more content…
federalism was America’s government, the states and the national government had a pretty close relationship. Now that the America government has adopted the coercive federalism, that close relationship has become almost no relationship. This coercive government has altered the state and nation government in two main areas: the American people have lost trust and respect for the national government. Our first problem is the lost in trust.
The states are losing trust and confidence in the national government because of this coercive government. According to www.usatoday.com, a Pew Poll back in 2013 showed that just about half of the voters, stated that the government has become a bigger threat to their freedom. Why do they feel this way? They feel this way because the national government is trying so hard to control our everyday lives, and individuals want their privacy. The national government is trying to put in place several things such as; TSA scanners, Homeland Security, gun control laws, and even gun confiscation. These are just a few items that www.usatoday.com list as reasons of why people are beginning to view the government as an actual threat. In fact, Nate Silver, a New York Time blogger, believes that the American people don’t like the “insurance broker”. Nate Sliver noticed that there was a decline of trust in the government when there was an increase in the government spending. …show more content…
(www.usatoday.com) Another way that this coercive government has altered the relationship between state and government is through the loss of respect. It is human nature to lose respect for someone who is trying to completely run your life. This is why most of the American people have no respect for the government, because the national government is trying to make us subject to them. As I mentioned before the government is setting up systems that they can use to control us. Some of these new systems are able to track the average American citizen. Another reason why the American people have lost respect for the government is because of the amount of rights each individual person has lost. These rights are the first ten amendments of the Constitution: The Bill of Rights. (http://www.washingtonsblog.com). With our main rights being taken away and we are now able to be tracked, why would we respect the national government? Since the relationship between the states and the government has been pulled way apart, what is going to happen?
People are going to start to rioting and protesting against laws. This has already begun to happen and is steadily getting worse. The American people do not like being controlled so they are going to take a stand for it, no matter how violent it may get. Just in the past few years, there have been protests all over the news about gun control, same sex marriages, abortions, and the police enforcement. These people, on both sides of these categories, all want one thing and that is their freedom and rights. The national government no longer includes the states when they are trying to solve a common issue. They don’t consider what each state suggests on fixing the problem. Instead, the national government has adopted the idea of coercive federalism and ruined the relationship the states and government used to
have.
Federalism is the federal principle or system of government. In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered the people is first divided between two distances government (states and federal), and the portion allotted to each subdivided among distance and separate departments. In their attempt to balance order with liberty, the founders
Eric Foner claims the definition of Federalism refers to the relationship between the national government and the states. Unlike the Constitution, the Articles of Confederation came with many weaknesses. Some provided by our powerpoint include that the Federal government had no power to make the states obey the Articles and laws that were passed by the legislature. The states also had the power to tax, and the opportunity to print their own money. Our powerpoint focuses on the $10 million Congress owed to other countries, as well as the $40 million it owed to the American veterans. The Constitution differed. Foner states that not only did the Constitution enhance national authority, but it also permitted Congress to levy taxes, conduct commerce, confirm war, deal with the foreign nations and Indians, and rent and help the “general welfare”. According to the powerpoint, Federalists focused on the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation.
This four-page undergraduate paper discusses the opposition that American leaders encountered after the Revolution, as a result of deciding to form a central government. The states feared that such a government would suppress them and would interfere with their internal affairs. Consequently, heated debates and uprisings characterize this period, which started with the framing of Articles in 1777 and ended with the final adoption of the United States constitution in 1787.
The federalists view saw the republicans view as a weakness. They insisted on a stronger common government. The federalists had an understanding that there could only be one sovereign in a political system, one final authority that everyone must obey and no one can appeal. They thought this was the only effective way in creating an effective central government. The independent states seemed to think it was clear that each one of them were independently sovereign, although based on history only small countries were suitable for the republican government. With history proving the republicans wrong for trying to create a republican government in the states the federalists were slowly trying to create a stronger central government. There first step was making the sovereign states agree to the Articles of Confederation which established a close alliance of independent states. The federalist central government was referred to as a “confederacy”.
Why should we question our government? Why should we doubt the decision that was taken for the better of the people years ago? Before federalism was even considered did we not have an anti federalist government? Did we not try to make it work? If anti-federalism is for the better of the people why did we feel the need to question it? Why did we feel the need to change it? The answer to all of these questions is simple. Anti-federalism is not and will never be for the better of the states, but most importantly it’s not for the better of the people as a whole.
Federalism was majorly influenced by Alexander Hamilton, who was the dominant author of the Federalist Papers. Hamilton did not want to repeat the mistake that Great Britain made and believed that spreading the power to multiple sources of government, along with checks and balances would abolish tyranny. Furthermore, it would aid the people to be heard and their concerns to be resolved faster and with attention from their government. Federalism is when a nation has two sources of government instead of one, the two levels are national and state/local. Similar to many American qualities, having a federal government has its advantages and disadvantages. Three positive factors of federalism are that there is a more orderly system to dispute and
In my opinion, the relationship between the Federal government and the States is unclear whether which institution has the authority to implement legislations. The vagueness of the American constitution particularly in the 10th Amendment of the Constitution that quote ” The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” The ambiguous of the American Constitution may be the main cause of the over power of Federal government.
...n our federal system has changed dramatically over the years. State governments have served as training grounds for national politicians and as laboratories in which new ideas can be tested. The Supreme Court, in its role as interpreter of the Constitution, has been a major player in the redefinition of our federal system. Increasingly, Congress has been guilty of undertaking areas traditionally reserved to the states and restricting authority to regulate these areas. Both federal and state politicians compete to address problems. Over the years, power in the federal system has flowed to the national government because tax money has flowed to there. With its financial resources, the federal government has been able to offer assistance to state and local governments and thereby, involve itself in just about every governmental function performed by these governments.
America is changing, the country that once was based on religious ideas is slowly becoming history, to the point that we can lose all traces of the America that was founded in 1776. As the days continue there is a continuous battle over the public possessing guns. A large portion believes and supports laws preventing civilians from owning military style rifles. With the growing support, these supports are trying to get guns all together out of the hands of people. With the recent mass shootings, Sandy Hook, Aurora, Colorado, and Virginia Tech, causing big support of these laws, many people fear that losing guns to the government will allow for criminals to do anything they want because civilians wont have a way to protect themselves. If guns are removed, the crime will increase, and there is more potential for foreign attacks to be held on U.S. soil.
Federalism or “federal” ties around a system of government. It controls armies, declares wars, coins money, and regulate trade between states and foreign nations, and treaties (Mrs, Crouse’s powerpoint pg:3 num:9). Specifically this was created to organize the powers that exist in the system of government so everything can be organized. It also divides the power among a central government and several regional governments (Mrs, Crouse’s powerpoint pg:2 num:8). More ever Since everything passes through one system it had to be divided into 3 sections: delegated powers, implied powers, and inherited powers.
...rers, and thieves will run rampant with no law enforcements to uphold the peace. Mass amounts of people will die, families will be separated, and peaceful ways of life will be long gone. Guard your loved ones, board up your windows and keep you gun under your pillow because you’re gonna need it.
Federalism, by definition, is the division of government authority between at least two levels of government. In the United States, authority is divided between the state and national government. “Advocates of a strong federal system believe that the state and local governments do not have the sophistication to deal with the major problems facing the country” (Encarta.com).
How well has federalism worked in the United States? This is all a matter of opinion. Federalism has indeed been an active structure for government that fits in quite well with the changing American society. This particular system of government has been around for over two hundred years, and under all those years the separation of power under American federalism has changed numerous amounts of times in both law and practice. The United States Constitution does allow changes and amendments in the Constitution have assigned miscellaneous roles to the central and state governments than what originally intended. The suitable equilibrium between national and state powers is repeatedly an issue in American Politics.
Federalism is a legal concept that is centered around the concept that law is best handled as a two layered responsibility. Federalism is also built on a belief that sharing power with the local government is key to a successful governance. According to the text book, “the United States was the first nation to adopt federalism as its governing framework” (pg83). The following are a few examples of some advantages, as well as disadvantages of Federalism.
It all began when the United States became an independent state. Regulations, laws, and restrictions were placed to ensure that citizens did not undergo monarchist persecution. However, it seems that as the country gets older the reigns are tightened. And while government officials believe that certain laws are needed to further develop the United States, the free citizens of the country are losing their freedom. The banning of manufacturing firearms does not solve the problem; it only creates another one. Convicted felons are being let out of jail on good behavior while free citizens are being punished for obeying the laws of the land.