Argumentative Prompt: The Adventure Of The Speckled Band

788 Words2 Pages

Argumentative Prompt- "The Adventure of the Speckled Band"





In the story "The Adventure of the Speckled Band", the detective Sherlock Holmes was to solve a mystery regarding the unexplainable death of a woman named Julia Stoner. Helen Stoner, Julia's sister, consulted Sherlock Holmes about the matter. After a number of questions, as well as a thorough examination of the crime scene, it was deciphered by the detective himself that it was probably the step-father's fault. However, while saving Helen Stoner's life by fending off the deadly snake that killed her sister, another life was taken. Dr. Roylott was killed by the snake that he had used for his murderous deeds, once it retreated through a ventilator, back into his room, biting him. I believe Sherlock Holmes was not guilty of his death. Although he knew he had agitated the snake, he could have never known it was going to kill Dr. Roylott. Sherlock Holmes did not know where Dr. Roylott was in the room. Additionally, the doctor should have known how to maintain the snake. Lastly, on any other occasions that the snake was provoked, it had never bit him before. …show more content…

Roylott previously studied in India for years before returning to England. The man had even obtained other pets besides the deadly swamp adder from the foreign country, including a leopard and a baboon. It was also known that Dr. Roylott killed Julia Stoner with the same snake. From clues found in his room, it was clear that he was training the snake with milk and a whistle multiple times a week. This explained why Helen Stoner heard faint whistles in the dead of night at times. With all of this knowledge and experience, Sherlock Holmes could have assumed that Dr. Roylott had enough experience to control the snake properly to avoid

Open Document