Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The positive impact of patriotism
The positive impact of patriotism
Colonial protest
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The positive impact of patriotism
Imagine, several men dressed as stereotypical Native Americans, dumping what is equivalent to $1,000,000 of stolen tea into the Boston Harbor. This seemingly unrighteous and illegal activity was a reality in the Boston Tea Party, just one of the many unjustified acts performed by the Sons of Liberty, a group responsible for so many violent and illegal activities, they can even be considered a terrorist organization. While many patriots believe that seceding from Britain is the best way for the Colonies’ success because the British have supposedly taxed the Colonies unfairly and exercised too much control over the Colonies, the American Colonies should stay loyal to Britain and pay their taxes at the level Britain requires. In order to prevent …show more content…
violence in the Colonies and to end the string of violent actions done by the Sons of Liberty, we, the American colonists, believe that the claims of the Patriots and the Sons of Liberty are false, and that the Colonies should remain loyal to Great Britain in order that we might repay them for their protection in the French and Indian War and continue to receive their defense, keep peace in the Colonies and reverse some of the negative effects caused by the Boston Tea Party, and because the events at the Boston Massacre are greatly misunderstood and bias controls much of the information in the Colonies. For far too long, the Colonies have taken the protection given to them by the British for granted, especially the protection received in the French and Indian War. This war fought with the French over land put the British colonies in grave danger, as the French advanced on British land. The British spent a great deal of money on protecting their Colonies, to preserve their land as well as the people dwelling on it. As a result of this, the British defeated their enemies, thus driving out the French and eliminating a major threat to the Colonies. The British taxing the Colonies is completely justified due to the amount of money and protection that was given to the Colonies. This is very well stated when Thomas Whately says “a war undertaken for their defense only…they should contribute to the Preservation of the Advantages they have received….” (Whately 1). Therefore, the rejection of the taxes enforced by Britain is both illegal and unjustified. Already, large amounts of violence have erupted in the Colonies after a patriot uprising was began. Even before the war began, radical patriots such as the Sons of Liberty have performed turbulent acts, such as the hanging of mannequins dressed to look like the British tax collectors, the dumping of tea in the Boston Harbor, and the mob of people taunting and attacking the British soldiers at such a level that shots had to be fired into the crowd. Firstly, the hanging of fake tax collectors, and the tar and feathering of actual tax collectors is unacceptable, and the backlash toward the taxes is very excessive. While the patriot John Dickinson once wrote, “[The Townshend Acts claim the authority] to impose duties on these colonies, not for the regulation of trade…but for the single purpose of levying money upon us.”, he is putting the Townshend Acts in bad light by saying they were imposed solely for the purpose of taking the colonists’ money. While, the Townshend Acts were made to make money and to tax the Colonists, as already discussed, the tax is justified due to the protection the colonies received in the French and Indian War from the British. Secondly, the dumping of stolen tea into the harbor is both unjustified, and a poor way to protest a tax. The tax on tea was low, only $0.02 a pound, and most likely was implemented to pay off Britain’s war debt. Also, instead of committing a felony as the patriots chose to, a more peaceful form of protest could have taken place. This may have led to a much more constructive result. However, instead of a peaceful protest, the patriots chose to throw $1,000,000 worth of stolen tea into the, which only forced Britain to tighten the reigns on the Colonies. By performing Boston Tea Party, the patriots frustrated their own cause even more, and by protesting violently, peace will be very difficult to obtain. Lastly, the Boston Massacre, a misunderstood event that has been changed by propaganda to spread the hatred of the British around the Colonies. The unfortunate deaths of five patriots was undoubtedly caused by the mass of people crowding around the British soldiers. The soldiers were pelted with snow, ice, coal, oyster shells, and even clubs. According to the Boston Massacre Video, one soldier was struck with a club that was thrown from the crowd and fell to the ground (Boston Massacre Video). Meanwhile, the crowd taunted the British, even daring them to fire. With their lives clearly in danger, and chaotic crowd yelling “Fire!”, the soldiers may have felt a need to fire, or the fallen soldier’s gun may have discharged. Either way, the British soldiers were justified in the shooting of the crowd. However, after, Paul Revere drew a picture of the Massacre, showing the British soldiers firing on an innocent crowd, among a number of other propagandic aspects of the image. However, this image is highly biased, and unfortunately many other images or documents about the relationship of Britain and the Colonies are also very tendentious. Even the Declaration of Independence fails to show completely factual evidence. For example, “In every stage of these oppressions, we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms.” (Jefferson 7). This can be disputed easily when one cites the Boston Tea Party or the tar and feathering of tax collectors. However, this biased information still managed to be written in the document claiming the reasons the Colonies are fighting for independence. Therefore, the Boston Massacre and many other events in the Colonies have been altered, and the information spread around the Colonies is very biased. Therefore, we, the American colonists, believe that the claims of the patriots and the sons of liberty are false, and believe that the colonists and that the Colonies should remain loyal to Great Britain in order that we might repay them for their protection in the French and Indian War and continue to receive their defense, keep peace in the Colonies and reverse some of the negative effects caused by the Boston Tea Party, and because the events at the Boston Massacre are greatly misunderstood and bias controls much of the information in the Colonies.
The British deserve the taxes we pay for their protection in the French and Indian War, and the rejection of the Stamp Act, the Townshend Acts, and the Tea Act is unjustified. Also, the Boston Tea Party was a poor and illegal way to protest, and should not be viewed as a positive event in the patriot’s fight for freedom. Finally, the information that is causing a patriot uprising in the Colonies is highly biased, and not based completely off of truth. While the patriots may believe that independence is the Colonies’ best option, based on the reasons given, loyalty will ensure economic success with Britain at the helm, grant us protection from the largest army in the world, and keep peace, to avoid fighting a completely one sided war. The question the Colonies must ask themselves: if one puts the brash and impulsive thinking aside and examines the true facts, is a war really worth the time, money, and
lives?
Many people believe that the Boston Tea Party arose just because of the Tea Act that came into play in 1773, but in-fact, this major statement arose from two issues surrounding the British Empire in 1765. The first of the issues was that the British East India Company was at risk of going under and the Parliament was finding ways to bring it back. The second issue was that there was a continuing dispute about the extent of the Parliament’s authority. Many colonists believe that the Parliament went overboard with their power and the people were concerned about the future. Attempting to resolve these two major issues, the North Ministry only worsened the problem and produced a showdown that would eventually result in revolution.
At the beginning of the war, everything was in array and no one could agree on anything, disorganization and uncertainty overwhelmed everyone. Organizations that were meant to be unifying factors for the colonists, like the Continental Congress, were little more than debating clubs that had to work for weeks before they could come to a decision. As time went on and the Tea Act was put into place the rage of the people made them grow closer. By the eve of the American Revolution, Parliament’s aggression towards the colonists had drawn a distinction between the colonist’s political, economic, and social ideas and those of the British. Colonists had embraced a new identity that helped fuel their resistance against Britain (American Identity and
The colonists were in every right, aspect and mind, not only justified but also it was about time that they stood of and actually take action against the British. The choice of going to war with them, was the only choice that they had. All diplimatical options that they had ceased to stand a chance against the tyrant Britain. From the very beginning when the colonists felt upset against their mother country and the way that they went about the law making, up until the beginning of the war, they tried all diplimatical options that they had, by sending letters, you name it. When they didn’t work then they had no other means but to declare war.
The Sons of Liberty answered the call. In an act of defiance, “a few dozen of the Sons of Liberty, opposing new British laws in the colonies, systematically dumped three shiploads of tea into Boston harbor. They acted to prevent the royal authorities from collecting taxes on that import” (Bell). This left Parliament infuriated. They did what they only knew how to do and put a tighter squeeze on the colonists.
Patrick Henry once said, “give me liberty or give me death!” During the revolutionary war. The American revolution had begun in Lexington on April 9, 1775. This was where the first battle of the American revolution occurred. Through all the battles and acts the British had placed on the colonists, they had suffered greatly and decided to break away from Britain. But, were the colonists valid in disuniting from Britain and conducting war? The American colonists were justified in waging war and splitting from Britain because the British were unjust to the colonists , they imposed unnecessary acts against the colonists and the British ignored all requests for change.
By this point, the colonists were beginning to question Britain’s motives towards them. They believed they were being treated like slaves and being used solely for the economic growth of Britain. One night, in 1773, the colonists rebelled against these taxes on their tea. A group of men dressed as Native Americans boarded a ship at Boston Harbor and unloaded three vessels of taxed tea (Boston Tea Party). This event, known a...
July 4th of 1776 is arguably the most significant day in American history. On this day, the thirteen British colonies won their independence from Great Britain, their mother country at the time. The war that allowed the colonies to gain their independence was, of course, the American Revolution. One reason the colonists’ declaration of independence was understandable was because after an extended period of salutary neglect, the British started imposing laws on the colonies. Another reason was that the British violated colonists’ rights by implementing the Proclamation of 1763. A third and final reason the colonies were correct in breaking away from Great Britain was that although the colonists were not represented in British Parliament, Great Britain still taxed them. The thirteen British colonies were absolutely justified in seceding from Great Britain because the British started to enforce laws after a long period of salutary neglect, they violated the colonists’ rights by passing the Proclamation of 1763, and the colonies were required to pay taxes even though they were not represented in Parliament.
Exciting extreme alarm or intense fear describes the life of mine and others. The screaming of war is like kids yelling for what they want. Religious people, are people who are against war; they are called Quakers. At one point soldiers started to not trust George Washington and they started leaving which led more and more people leaving. I have decided to reenlist because I have pride in my country, knowing my lifestyle, and I will always fight for my country.
The Boston Tea Party was not really a tea party. Instead it was a group of people dressed like Indians with axes dumping tea off three ships to protest British taxes. It took place in Boston Harbor, Boston, Massachusetts on December 16, 1773, from 7:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M.
George Hewes’ account of the Boston Tea party is considered a firsthand account of a historically significant event. The Boston Tea party took place the night of December 16, 1773 on three ships anchored in Boston Harbor. Hewes recounts the events leading up to the Boston Tea Party, the actual attack on the ships and its aftermath. He provides descriptive narration thus contributing to the historical context surround the Tea party. This event and many others leading up to it, provide a colorful backdrop on the eve of the American Revolution.
The Boston Massacre was one the most controversial massacre in American history that teased the coming of the American Revolution. People were taunting a British soldier who was standing “in front of the Boston Custom House” who got very frustrated to the point where he hit somebody. The soldier got overwhelmed by people who came after he hit one of them, called help from his fellow soldiers. When Captain Preston and his soldiers arrived at the scene, people were coming from everywhere, some were trying to fight them and some were just there to watch. Then, one of the soldier shot at the people and his fellow soldiers started shooting after, which killed five people. This what ended it up being called the Boston Massacre. Some might say that the murderer were the soldiers who shot the people, but the real murderer is
Up until the American colonies had become established, the colonists were highly dependent upon the military and economic support of Great Britain. Though the colonies Britain’s only concern was profit and not the wellbeing of the colonies, especially in Boston, the desire for this support, as well as the necessity, dissipated. As this happened, two groups were formed; the Tories, who supported staying with England and loyal to the king, and there were the Whigs, who supported liberty and patriotism and wanted the right to self-government. The colonists did not want to secede from England until they felt it absolutely necessary, by which point news of the British military occupation in Boston was spreading throughout the colonies, and with
The Intolerable Acts of 1774 greatly fueled the First Continental Congress. In response to the Boston Tea party, the British Parliament decided that a series of laws were needed to calm the rising resistance in America. “One law closed Boston Harbor until Bostonians paid for the destroyed tea. Another law restricted the activities of the Massachusetts legislature and gave added powers to the post of governor of Massachusetts.” As one can imagine, the American colonist viewed this as the British attempt to curtail their quest for independence.
Most people have heard of The Boston tea party. When American patriots dressed as Mohawk Indians boarded the British ships in the Boston harbor and dumped all of the tea into the ocean. But what most people fail to realize is the great importance behind this protest. To fully understand a topic of history one must first acknowledge the actions behind it. The French and Indian war, the Stamp Act, the Townshend Revenue Act, as well as the Tea Act are all important catalysts of the legendary Boston tea party. Which is why we will discuss these topics before examining the events of the Boston tea party.
The French and Indian War set the stage for future events that no one could ever have imagined. The economic practice of mercantilism, which insured profit only to the mother country was the accepted practice between England and her colonies. As long as these economic policies were met, England left much of the day to day governing of the colonies up to the colonies. It was this "salutory neglect" that ultimately led to the ideological differences between England and the colonies. England won the war, but it paid a great price for that victory. England was bankrupted, and as a result had no choice but to look to her colonies to regain financial stability. The pressures of taxation and naval restrictions imposed by the crown and Parliament, were viewed by the colonists as tyrannical acts. Although the colonies were on a path to becoming "Americanized" they held the lessons of Magna Carta, the Glorious Revolution of 1688-89 close to their heart. In their eyes, "Englishmen had rights" under the laws of the mother country. It was only when these laws were usurpted by the crown that the colonies had no choice but to protest their discontent. The political authority that England executed over the colonies after so many years of neglect led to the ideological differences that would ultimately result in the American Revolution.