Argumentative Essay: Surplus Animals In Captivity

Last reason that animals should not be kept in captivity is because the surplus animals are often sold and traded and put down. Most zoos in America have a very dark side that is hidden from the public when it comes to their surplus animals. Animal breeding in zoos is cited as conservation under The Species Survival Plans (SSP). These breeding programs result in a surplus of unwanted animals; all in the name of endangered species preservation. These animals can be adult animals who have been bred with a number of partners and are no longer needed to produce offspring for the zoo. Basically, any animal that does not “fit” into the zoos breeding program can be considered a surplus. Surplus animals can also be animals that the zoo no longer finds profitable, cubs that were a big hit the year before might be replaced by newer, younger animals. Baby animals are a huge draw, and generate a lot of revenue for zoos. When these animals grow into adults they are no longer considered profitable. Since zoos are not responsible for lifetime care of animals, they

Accredited zoos in America have handed surplus animals over to circuses, unregulated roadside zoos, private breeders, exotic animal dealers, private pet owners, taxidermists, laboratories for scientific research, and hunting ranches. The Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) claims to hold accredited zoos to a strict code of ethics, only allowing the transfer of animals to other accredited zoos or to non accredited zoos that have provided exemplary care for their animals. The AZA has a policy that prohibits accredited zoos from sending animals to hunting ranches or auctions. According to an investigation by the San Jose Mercury News, (between 1992 and 1998) 30% of animals that were moved from accredited zoos ended up in the hands of roadside zoos, private dealers, and hunting