Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why should women not be allowed in the military
Women in the united states military gender equality
Women in the united states military gender equality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why should women not be allowed in the military
As claimed by Major Eleanor Taylor,” Women have to be able to be given the same opportunities as men...in order to have the same opportunities they have to be exposed to the same risk.” In other words, Major Eleanor taylor asserts that women in the army should be put into the same danger as men while in combat especially front line duty. Even though some people believe women are not physically or emotionally stable, women should be allowed to fight in combat because women who are physically capable of serving in the military are easier to recruit and a gender force makes the armed forces stronger.
Now women are allowed to be in armed forces as we know with the most recent news of the first women to graduate from ranger class, Capt. Kristen Griest and 1st Lt. Shaye Haver however, women are not allowed on front line duty and why is that? Many people say that women are not emotionally or physically capable. Few bigger reasons is that they believe that the male soldiers will do foolish things for our women, the other is that they will pamper with the mission's effectiveness. There has been a lot of conflict with if women are as effective as men and or as useful.
What makes women less effective than men? On the website Sister In Arms there is a article
…show more content…
basically states “ women are less effective because they are not strong enough, women will over stretch themselves by pushing their bodies beyond their breaking point and of course emotionally stable.” There is so much controversy on why women are not fit to be in front line combat, however women are just as strong and can do things that no man can do out and while in the Armed forces. Women being in combat will be a good thing because women have a natural mother instinct whether a mother or not. Imagine you and your combat group got deployed to go fight ISIS, A man was killed and his best friend saw it first hand. His best friend gone defending our country, when something bad happens who do you go to first ? depending on where you are at it's either your mom, sister , or bestfriend that is a girl. There is one women that is deployed helps you pull the wounded into safety and gives you the comfort no male soldier would be able to do since they don't have motherly instincts. Women have already been fighting and dying in combat roles front line or not. During World War 2 women cut their hair and disguised themselves as men since women weren't even allowed to fire a gun at the enemy . 350,000 women served in WW2 both at home and in armed forces. Between the years 1940- 1945 the percentage of women increased by 10%, starting from 27% to 37%. Women stepped up when they were needed, women started to work outside of the house in conditions they would have never worked in. They were medics, worked in factories, photographers, and if they owned a farm when the men went away they took over the male's position in the house. The ban was enforced in the year of 1994, and smaller exemptions of the ban were passed in 2012.The ban on women in front line combat was lifted by secretary of defense Leon Panetta in January of 2013.The ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) last year sued the Pentagon for the right for women to take up positions on the front line, and the Marines recently began allowing women to serve as officers, the timing of Panetta’s announcement comes as a surprise.
I think it was a surprise since the ban has been sturdy for 19 years. What some might not know is that lifting the ban was recommended by the chief of staff. Lifting the ban will make thousands of jobs for the women currently and planning on
serving. Women who sign up for front line combat positions know exactly what they are getting themselves into. If they have what it takes let them go and train. What is holding us back? Because there women ? Men can have or get the same injuries as a women. We are all human no one can not get injured. But if a female soilder want to knowing what she is getting herself into sign up for the job, get her training and train her like a soldier who is getting ready to go fight for the country not like a girl. This country that we live in has made women sports highlights of the olympics, overcame slavery, the depression, Inequality, and gay marriage is legal and gays are allowed in the army to. The standards of a female soldier is lowered when it comes to training. But why in high school or college if a girl wants to train with the guy team, they push them even more and harder then the boys. Because they believe that she can do it. This is what the Armed forces is lacking equality and trust. As equality women are treated unfair it seems in the military. They get denied formal recognition to their combat roles or experiences. Female officers with real but unknowledged combat experience were denied career advancement and training. The problem isn't the Ban, the ban was lifted but MALE officers or leaders in the army are the ones denying the rights of career advancement to female soldiers. Reports have found that women are making important contributions to the military readiness of the united states. For physical training to prevent muscle tears, extra pre-training for muscle building can be used to reduce the female injury rates. It is easier to recruit and deploy women who are in better shape than men. Because it is possible to calibrate recruitment and training standards to women. Military readiness with women is that with a mixed gender force it will make the individual groups and armed forces stronger. The forces were failing with volunteers to join but when the ban was lifted more willing recruits came pouring in. Women combat soldiers are unlikely to ruin their duty by becoming pregnant after a call up as they have volunteered to join the army. At some points women are more effective than men. Such as delicate and sensitive jobs that needs interpersonal skills not every soldier has. Here is one soldier's personal experience, Staff Sgt. Stacy pearsall. Her vehicle came under attack in the city of Baque, She jumped onto the machine gun and began firing back. A soldier outside layed on the floor knocked out, she opened the back door of her vehicle and jumped out to pull her partner to safety. He was 200 pounds more than her and 6’2 , she bear hugged him and pulled him into safety only falling twice .She took of his protective gear and she realized his carotid artery had been torn. which is the artery that goes from the back of your head to side of the neck. She stuck her fingers into his neck and clamped onto the artery. A few moments later a medic showed up and asked her if she was a medi. She stated “ heck no i'm the photographer.” I big decided to share this one story because to me it showed that no matter the injury women can suck it up and do what they need to do to get the job done. The biggest part of this story is that the women wasn't even a combat soldier but she did everything a combat soldier would have done she fired the weapon back at the enemy, carried a wounded into safety twice her weight, and performed as a medic when needed. Pearsall always passed the fitness scale by the standards of the male. Mr. Jacobs was the one who trained her. He stated that, “ the key would to make a women systematically train to the higher standards…. By requiring women to do more pull-ups or longer ruck marches, and they constantly succeeded.” By this training it had reduced hip and back injuries. In the article What women Bring to the Fight it states that , “ women can enhance the combat capabilities of the military from the squad to the joint staff without impairing cohesion.” Which is only based on goals not gender. Adding women can strengthen every organization of the army. The armies women only complete 6.73 percent of the general officers. Some other statistics are that 65 women fly combat jets in every aviation unit in the Navy with no hesitation in unit performance. Other Countries have also opened up their front line positions to women such as; Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Netherlands, New Zealand , Norway, Poland, Romania, Spain and Sweden. After reading an article, I realized that in history we have had a lot of women in combat. A Lot of African American women to be specific. As we know they disguised themselves as men and served as combatants. Which means someone fighting in war. Also as nurses and spies. Today 15 percent of active duty women officers and over 33 percent are african american. 7 women died in line of duty while serving in theater during the vietnam war. Almost 41,000 served in theater during the Persian Gulf War. Only 13 women were killed and two taken prisoner. Know this statistic shows that women in combat does not decrease the outcome of the battles and wars we fight, 13 out of 41 thousand women died, that's not even one percent of the army. Russia has one of the strongest armies, and in the first world war russia used a all female combat unit. After 1945 all experiences were forgotten. There are organizations that try to limit women's participation in the military. Saying that females are shorter, smaller, and average. Well here is the upside shorter and smaller they can hide easier and move around a lot sneakier. Average well if an average women wants to go and protect our rights she's not so average after all.
The military is trying to find new ways to recognize the fact that women now fight in the country’s wars. In 2011 the Military Leadership Diversity Commission recommended that the Department of Defense remove all combat restrictions on women. Although many jobs have been opened for women in the military, there is still 7.3 percent of jobs that are closed to them. On February 9, 2012, George Little announced that the Department of Defense would continue to reduce the restrictions that were put on women’s roles. The argument that “women are not physically fit for combat” is the most common and well-researched justification for their exclusion from fighting units. It has been proven if women go through proper training and necessary adaptations, they can complete the same physical tasks as any man. Though there seem to be many reasons from the exclusion of women in the military, the main ones have appeared to be that they do not have the strength to go through combat, would be a distraction to the men, and that they would interrupt male bonding and group
Women should be allowed in combat roles in the armed forces because they are just as capable as men. To begin, women such as Shaye Haver and Kristen Griest, graduates of the Fort Benning Ranger School, have shown that they can meet the same physical requirements as men. Nevertheless, these women still weren’t allowed to serve in combat positions despite the rigorous training they completed that involved grueling obstacles they had to complete all while carrying 100-pound gear. Does that make any sense to you? It didn’t to me and it certainly didn’t to women like Sgt. Patricia A. Bradford who said “If you have to be able to lift a certain amount of weight in order to do a certain job, then the weight is not going to know whether you’re male or female.” (Women at Arms: On the Ground.). In fact, in some instances women have proved to be even more
In the military physical strength and endurance is a major element to nearly every task. Having endurance and sustainable strength is very vital in many instances but most importantly in the combat zone. Men are physically stronger and can tolerate more than women naturally. Hypothetically if there was a situation where a troop was injured and needed to be carried out of a fighting zone it would make more sense for a man to carry the troop out because they can tolerate the weight more easily then a woman. Women are built to have children, and while they are capable of heavy lifting and have remarkable endurance, it is a different level than men. Looking back men have always been hunters, gatherers, ultimately being the ones who do all the physical work. After decades of these physical life styles that men have endured and the homemaker life style women have come to obtain it is clear that the order of nature has spoken. The normality of women being the only ones that can produce children and men gain strength more easil...
Should women serve in combat positions? The Combat Exclusion Law has dealt with this question since the 1940’s. As time continues, the question remains. The military has increased the percentage of females allowed to be enlisted and commissioned in the services as well as increasing the positions allotted to them (Matthews, Ender, Laurence, & Rohall, 2009). Keenan posits “women have served with distinction in … the Revolutionary War…as volunteer nurses and were only occasionally in the direct line of fire…four nurses evacuating 42 patients while the Germans bombed their field hospital…” (the DoD Combat Exclusion Policy) pg. 21.
There was a time when women were unable to enlist and thought of as one who maintains her home and keeps her husband happy. That has changed along with the growth of our nation. Women are now able to join the military as well as serving in jobs of combat. Our servicewomen have gone through plenty and fought for where they are within our military ranks. So why are they feeling punished for being a female in the military?
Many women around the world have big responsibilities in the military, and although some people may disagree, I believe they can handle anything a man can handle when it comes to being on the battlefield. Some people think that women should not be able to fight in the military, where as other people think they should be able to fight in the military. Each supporter and non-supporter has their own reasons. Some of the reasons for the non-supporters are because of their gender. They think that because they are women, they cannot handle the challenges that being on the battlefield brings. Women are willing to fight, and they know what can happen, they know exactly what can happen. They are willing to fight for their country, and I believe they should be able to. The men that fight for our country are against women fighting in combat. They believe that women are not capable of doing what they do to defend and fight for our country. The men feel that they cannot trust women to help back them up at war simply because of the fact that they are women.
Historically, women have been excluded from combat roles. On the surface, it is because men, who have always thought of themselves better and stronger than women, believed that females could not handle the responsibility of holding a combat position and women are rupturing the socially constructed gender norms that were set in place. According to Nicole Dombrowski, “no other topic concerning women’s role in war creates as great a debate as the question of women’s active participation in combat units.” The benefits for the expansion of women’s roles in the military advantage not only the women but the military as well. In comparison, the drawbacks of expansion of women’s roles are usually disadvantages to the men within the military.
Historically, women’s participation in combat roles was limited or hidden, with the exception of a few individuals. Although women had fought unofficially in the U.S army as far back as the Revolutionary War, which they usually disguised themselves as men in order to avoid the rules that excluded them. The gender war and integration in the military has always faced the question of social acceptance, were as society can accept how women will be treated and respected in the military. Throughout the history of the military, our leadership has always sought ways of how to integrate without upsetting the general public to believing that women are capable and created equal as any man.
The problem of women fighting in combat along with their male counterparts is not a one-sided problem. Elizabeth Hoisington has earned the rank of Brigadier General in the U.S. Army, leads the Women’s Army Corps and believes that women should not serve in combat because they are not as physically, mentally, or emotionally qualified as a male is and that ...
Many agree, that in certain military occupations, women can function at the same level as men. The controversy about having women fighting with men in wars is the fact that they have a different physical structure, deal with stress and emotions differently , are more susceptible to injury and just don't have the killer instinct necessary to get the job done. Although the last statement might appear to be a stereotype, most women would not be capable of supporting the demanding rigors of war-like situations. It would be a great mistake to allow women in these stressful and dangerous situations.
Across the history, women Suffer from luck of their right. Culture and civilization was not respect women and put them in the lower layer in their social pyramid. Kill them were they alive, while other give them a life with a lot of misery and obstacle, which is the same thing or killing them better than these life . At the few previous centuries, the world growth and become more opening. people understanding that they are needing women in a lot of job outside their home as men. Sadly, when we came to combat sector, we stop thinking logically. It is men major one hundred percent . If we look to the book (1001 things everyone should know about women's history) which written by Constance Jones (2000) we can find that only 88013 women among history had the ability to take part in military by give a variety of services. Some country actually these day try to make it happen. For instance the first country was allowed women in military was Norway around 1985. Then, it followed by thirteen other countries. It still small percentage compared with the world. It is the right of women to join army and take part in combat, because they are capable as men in adapting with situation. Also, they have equally amount in cerebration and they have the right to decide their own destiny.
Ding! That’s the sound of the oven going off, signaling that the cookies are done. Wait, where is the oven mitt? Oh NO! The cookies, they’re burning, hurry! Hurry! OOPS, too late. One cannot simply be a female and let cookies burn, can she? Yes, she can. Throughout history women have been oppressed and confined to the kitchen and the house. Women who sought to get rights were seen as radicals and sometimes even blacklisted from their jobs for protesting. Since ancient times, women had served as the caretakers of the home, children, and husband, getting nothing in return. Society had made it an expectation that women had to be married at a certain age and at times, not even finish their education. It was frowned upon if a woman wished to do more, such as get a job, or not get married at all. During the late 1800s to the 1900s women’s rights activists such as Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, to name a few, had stepped up and fought for women’s rights to vote and be heard as a valid voice. This had been the first step towards feminism and equality. After women were given the right to vote, there was given the issue of whether women should have a place in everyday society. They were
Should women be allowed in the military? My answer was at first a resounding “no.” However, once I started my research, my opinion changed. In 1948, Congress passed the combat exclusion law that prohibited women in the Air Force, Marines, and Navy to hold combat positions; however, the Army can assign these duties as they see fit (Schroeder). Some people assume that Americans are not ready to see a woman wounded or killed in war; however, there are female police officers that are wounded or killed daily (Schroeder). How can we rationalize that a woman has the right to die protecting our local communities but not our country? If a person chooses to be in a combat field, and can pass the physical demands required, gender should not be an issue. The arguments of physical differences and cohesion among the troops are valid arguments but not substantial enough to prevent women from serving in frontline combat roles within the military.
In an advertisement published in Vogue Paris in February 2009, Steven Klein photographs fashion model Lara Stone in a manner that brought much controversy to the world about women and violence. In the photograph, a fashionably clad woman in lingerie is forcibly held down by a naked man, while a police officer poses suggestively on her legs and points a gun in her face. This advertisement seems excessively violent for a fashion magazine that young girls and the majority of the mainstream world idolize. By condoning and making the type of violence that is popular in fashion magazines ‘cool’, people begin to recreate the scenes in these photographs in real life because they are constantly exposed to it. Furthermore, this constant exposure to violence
Ever since the dawn of man it has been believed that women were made to serve men. The social concept that women aren’t equal, or are even meant to be equal at all, starts with religion. In the Bible it says that women was made for man and from man. All the way back to the garden of Eden it was said that Adam needed a companion, God (according to the Bible) made Eve, and from that point on women were to serve man. Even if you don’t follow christianity, there are many religions that follow that much more harshly.