Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Drones should be regulated essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Drones should be regulated essay
Dealing with Drones Done: Have you ever wondered what drones are used for? They can be used for a variety of different things, including delivering pizza or endangering fire and rescue missions. For a bit of background information, drones are UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) that are remote controlled and carry no humans as passengers. However, the government seems to be torn on whether or not to regulate them. Regulations would mean the operator would have to be above 16 years of age. Drones would have to be kept below 400 feet, be flown only during the day, and be in the operator’s line of sight. These regulations are under review constantly. But the question still remains: should drones be regulated? My answer; they should. Done: If a drone crashed, would you want it to hit you on the head? Not many people would say yes to this. Although, if you are near a drone, this can become a hazardous possibility. A quote from the article Are private drones privacy pirates states, “At the Grand Canyon recently, a drone crashed, stunning visitors who were there to watch the sunset.” Those people were lucky that the drone didn’t injure anyone. Instead, all they had to deal with was the shock of the incident, which wasn’t necessary when you’re just trying to watch a sunset in peace. …show more content…
The drone crashed, nearly hitting a huge flock of birds that were minding their own business. This brings me to my second reason: drones should be regulated because they endanger wildlife. Animals are not dumb, however they may not be aware of when a drone will crash, which is something they shouldn’t have to worry about anyway. “In April, volunteers at Zion National Park in Utah watched a drone buzz over a herd of bighorn sheep. The drone separated the adults from the young.” This quote is from the article Are private drones privacy
“Government’s targeted killing of three U.S. citizens in two drone strikes, both in Yemen, far from any armed conflict zone.” (“Targeted Killings”). Drones or unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) is the technology that has taken war and fighting to a brand new level. The technology is believed to lower the use of troops and life loss in the wars that are happening today. Can that same technology be considered dangerous? Or are the side effects something that can simply be considered a small cost for something better? Drones demonstrate a growth in technological advances , and also the world. Although as brilliant this technology might be, it brings a threat to the people.
Evidence: Drones have many beneficial uses, including in search-and-rescue missions, scientific research, mapping, and more. But deployed without proper regulation, drones equipped with facial recognition software, infrared technology, and speakers capable of monitoring personal conversations would cause unprecedented invasions of our privacy rights. Interconnected drones could enable mass tracking of vehicles and people in wide areas. Tiny drones could go completely unnoticed while peering into the window of a home or place of worship.
Being a young American I have witnessed many problems with growing up in this great country of ours. We have homeless people who can't find work, rising inflation rates, an unbalanced budget, and more importantly, a problem with guns.
Imagine you are a little boy, a boy no older than six year olds, getting ready to for school. Your blue backpack rests on your shoulders as you approach the red labyrinth, both embracing you while simultaneously encroaching you. Suddenly, a harsh metallic booming sound erupts, and after a mere sliver in time, you lay dead on the floor in a pool of blood. Unfortunately, the course of action just envisioned is not merely hypothetical. Scores of innocent individuals are part of massacres done by the mentally ill with legally bought guns, guns made for war, guns made to maximize death and horror. In terms of reducing violence, the increase in gun regulation is essential in ending the gun violence epidemic
Like earlier this year, in February, when a drone came close to crashing into a Denton careflite helicopter enroute to pick up a patient (Dallas News). A close call could have turned into tragedy, but this can be prevented with meaningful laws restricting improper use of unmanned aircraft. Luckily, legislation was introduced to restrict the use of drones over certain facilities and sports venues. HB 1424 is purposed to create a criminal offense for unruly drone behavior over prohibited areas. Jane Nelson voted in favor of this bill.
The US military has used drones in the war against terrorist for years now and the use of drones for domestic use has become a popular dispute. A lot of Americans consider flying drones over private property violates the fourth Amendment and the only time a drone should be used is if the drone operator has a warrant and probable cause. It is considered trespassing by some if a warrant is not obtained. In 2013, 43 states debated 96 different drone regulating bills but only 8 of them passed. Along with legislatures, the FAA has also had trouble regulating drone flight. The government has manipulated the rules of privacy for years. In two separate but similar court cases, the police department used aerial surveillance to get Intel on marijuana farms. The owners of the farms declared that the method was unconstitutional and took it to court. The courts ruled in favor of the government, in saying that the helicopters were above a certain height of 1000 feet and it was not invading their
I do think that freedom needs to be won more than once. It shouldn’t need to though. Our founding fathers wrote the Constitution which have our freedoms, the 10 amendments. Our soldiers even fought for our freedom. America isn’t free anymore. My dad’s friend’s friend said that he is from South Africa and they have more freedom than we do.
In this email, I will be addressing a few issues that we discussed today in class. The first argument you made was that the right to bear arms only applies to militias. Well to address that I want to quote the entire second amendment. “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” When the founding fathers created the constitution they made sure they were so very precise down to the comma. In the second amendment, it says a well-regulated militia but there is a comma after militia. Then it goes on to say being necessary to the security of a free state with a comma after that. Finally, it states that it's the right of the people to bear
“Do We Need Gun Control?” Gun ownership is guaranteed by the second amendment, but is also considered to be one of the most controversial social and political issues today in America. There are roughly 300 million privately-owned firearms in the US, which works out to roughly one gun for every man, woman, and child in America. Nearly a third of the population owns at least one gun; some say for protective reasons, while others use them for recreational purposes. However, guns are not for everyone.
Hartigan, Pamela, and Elaine Lammas. "Gun Control." Encyclopedia of Public Health. Ed. Lester Breslow. Vol. 2. New York: Macmillan Reference USA, 2002. 511-513. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 3 May 2014.
Drones are the Future One of the latest and most controversial topics that has risen over the past five to ten years is whether or not drones should be used as a means of war, surveillance, and delivery systems. Common misconceptions usually lead to people’s opposition to the use of drones which is the reason it is important for people to know the facts about how and why they are used. Wartime capabilities will provide for fewer casualties and more effective strikes. New delivery and surveillance systems in Africa, the United Air Emirates and the United States will cut costs and increase efficiency across the board. Rules and regulations on drones may be difficult to enforce, but will not be impossible to achieve.
A lot of countries all over the world depend on technological advances to fight against their opponents. This reduced the risk of having a soldier wounded or dying in a war by making it easier with using these technologies when it comes to head to head combat. Even though using technologies are a great idea but many ethical issues arise from it. One of the main issue is the use of these Drones. This technology is developing more and more. In a recent study showed that there are over 700 active drone development all over the world and these programs are controlled under companies, research institutes, and the government. United States is mainly using these drones to fight against so called “terrorist” but some other countries use them as well. It is immoral and unethical to use these drones because it cause psychological disorders, violate privacy, cause deaths of innocent lives, and increase terrorism. (Reardon)
They build their own drones purely for entertainment. They used them to make a video or compete in a sport called drone racing. Drone racing is a new high-speed competitive sport. Thus having drones ban would result in people to stripped off their hobby. That mean the entire toy category would be wipe out in the market and that could affect the United States’s economy. The conclusion is to make the rules more strict and allow a certain area that allows the use of drones. Drones are getting ban not only prevent the decline of United States power and also stop the transformation in the technology of the United States. Drones create the newest job as well as an opportunity for people. This allows people to have many choices for jobs. For those who study engineering as drones will be more advanced in the future would have an easier time to get the job because they are new and so they need people. There are many jobs about drones that offer quite a sum of money. For example, drone pilots starting salary about fifty dollars an hour and there is no danger at all. Many others people opposed against drones because of what they saw on the news. Drones may have engraved to people mind that they are bloody weapons used to kill people which make people see drones in a different light. That is why people all around the world opposed the use of drones. There is some large model that frighten people because they look like aircraft and nobody know what would they do as they fly over our houses. Unfortunately, there is always an exception for those few people who ignore common sense and do dangerous things like lit the drone on fire and see how long it would fly. However, this cannot apply to anyone because generally people drives them extremely carefully. Drones are lives-saving tool which replaces a person and people still complaining about how dangerous drones could get. There is no bad drone only bad people use a drone for bad
On Sunday June 12th, 2016, Omar Mateen opened fire at the Orlando Pulse nightclub. Forty-nine people had their lives stolen from them, and fifty-three were injured. Angel Colon, a survivor of the attack, told Billboard magazine, “I was holding her hand tight and I didn’t let go. Then I felt gunshots, one at a time, go into her back. I can still hear the gunshots and feel their heat.
Drones are an emerging technology that has countless benefits and a myriad of intangible side-effects. I will clearly explain how drones effect on our lives by exploring the Social, Cultural, Political and Environmental impacts drone technology presents in our lives today.