Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should animals be held in captivity
Zoos are beneficial for animals
Should animals be held in captivity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Should animals be held in captivity
Why Animals Should Not be Held in Captivity
Imagine you are at a zoo, and as you walk by, you see animals acting strangely. Animals are biting themselves, vomiting, or banging their heads against the cage bars or glass walls. You look at them, trapped in lonely enclosures and feel sorry for them, trapped inside cages or glass, with nowhere to go.
Now imagine, that you visit the wildlife, and you see animals roaming freely in the wild, you look at them, and they are not acting strangely, they are acting how they should be. The animals have a lot of space and are not trapped, and they are not alone. Other animals are with them, socializing. This is how it should be, with animals living free and in the wild, and not trapped. I think that animals should not be kept in captivity because animals are forced to live in poor conditions, it causes a disease called zoochosis, and in many cases around the world, captive animals are not treated properly.
One reason that animals should not be held in captivity is because they are forced to live in disgraceful conditions. For instance, in a zoo, people try to do the best they can to re-create an animal's real life habitat, but no matter how hard they try, it just won’ t be the same as it is when they are in the wild. Zoo
…show more content…
For example, when they are released back into the wild, they scarcely survive. They do not survive because their living conditions in the zoo were so horrible that they are not in good health when they are released in the wild, so they would sometimes end up dying. This means that the zoo workers might not make sure that the animal is healthy and may just let them die. Although, some endangered species such as tigers also sometimes die because of low health, or other reasons! Zoos say that their breeding program will help, but it really doesn’ t, and the animal could, and usually does, end up
Animals life spans in Zoos are also drastically different from those in the wild. Studies have shown that animals kept in Zoos live only half of the lifespan animals do in the wild (Cokal 493). This goes to show that when animals are kept in Zoos they do not live statistically longer or healthier lives. They live shorter, problematic lives due to poor
I will now move onto arguments supporting the use of animal captivity. I am starting with Kant, who provides a strong argument for animal captivity. Kantian Ethics holds the view that we do not have any direct ethical duties to non-human animals. We only owe ethical duties to rational beings, and non-human animals are not included in this group. The value humanity comes from our capacity to be governed by autonomous, rational choices. Since non-human cannot be part of this, Kant believes we can do as we please with them. This can be demonstrated in Kant’s ‘Political Writings’ when he argues,
I will now provide arguments against the use of animal captivity. Firstly, I will use Peter Singer, who I believe delivers the strongest argument against animal captivity. Singer is a consequentialist who argues for animal rights and the position that animals should not be held captive. Singer reminds us that humans are animals but language makes us overlook this. As a utilitarian and hedonist, Singer looks towards the end result, where like human beings, other animals choose pleasure over suffering. Singer regards interests of consciousness rather than self-consciousness. Therefore since animals are conscious beings and animal captivity causes pain and suffering, it is wrong. Robert Garner
In the film, Madagascar, zoos are depicted as a sanctuary in which all the exotic animals are kept safe and are open for the public to view. But many would argue that zoos are inhumane, the caging of animals for our personal entertainment is unjustifiable. Those who believe that zoos are wrong and should be destroyed are animal rights activist; they believe that animals should be allowed to choose their own destiny. Those that believe that zoos are an important part of our lives are scientist and zoologist. This debate has gone on for generations and average folk are stuck in the middle, not knowing which side to stand on. The animals being kept in captivity could not be interviewed; their side of the story will be based on interpretation on their movement and interaction with animals in the zoo and in the wild. Are animals better suited to live in the harsh conditions of the wild or are they better suited to live their lives safely in captivity?
“DON’T BE SORRY. DO SOMETHING”-(The Animals) In the world there are many wild animals being help captive. It's not correct in my opinion. What the point of having such beautiful creatures in captivity. The poor animals end up having mental problems, as a result of being held captive for so long. That is extremely messed up. Many of the wild animals end up having psychosis. Psychosis is a severe mental disorder in which thought and emotions are so impaired that contact is lost with external reality. Usually when an animal is held in captivity, wild animals are never released back into their natural habitat. The wouldn´t survive no more. The humans have changed their lifestyle to the point the wild creatures become dependent on humans. Humans
Animals should not be kept in captivity for any reason unless they have been harmed and need to receive treatment, but they should be released as soon as they are healthy and capable of taking care of themselves again. The use of a captive animal for research, education, or entertainment is just wrong; no creature deserves to have their life taken away for our benefit. Would you want to be captured and put in a tiny box, or a fake little ecosystem, or abused and tortured because apparently that’s the only possible way to train an animal? How about just knowing that your real life is over and now all you get to do is put on a show for people? That is what we put these animals through for our entertainment, we tear children away from their parents.
The reasons that animals are held in captivity could favor some people and others not. Animals in captivity are usually held for entertainment, education, research, and conservation purposes. The other major reason they are held in captive is the process of rehabilitation. The article, Ethical Issues, defines rehabilitation as the treatment of wild animals found injured or ill, taken into captivity until restored to full health and then returned to the wild. Then when the animal is released they are then able to live freely in their own habitat. Although this may lead to suffering and stress or even death for the animal. The animal is so dependent on their caretaker that once they are put into the wild they do poorly (1).
Zoos display fascinating animals from all over the world for human entertainment, research, conservation, and education. Many scientists conduct studies on animals in captivity that they may not have been able to in the wild. Zoos educate all the visitors that come; they let people know everything that they know about the animals on display. We do learn a lot from these animals, but not all of the animals in the zoo are behaving like they normally would in the wild. Larger animals, such as elephants and orcas (commonly known as killer whales), have trouble with being confined in such a small area. However, many smaller animals benefit from zoos because they provide protection from predators, natural disasters, and poachers. They also benefit from conservation efforts; the babies being born get all the care they could ever need. Some animal rights activists are concerned that the conservation efforts are limiting the gene pool of the species. They argue that the small number of animals able to breed in captivity limits biodiversity and leads to weaknesses in the species overall. Zoos are wonderful places to study and learn about animals, but we need to improve the living standards for animals that struggle with captivity.
Animals should not be held captive in zoos because it is inhumane and unfair to the animals. There are so many records of terrible things that have happened to animals in zoos over the past few centuries, the go under the radar too often. Too few people even know about these animal care atrocities, and therefore the New York Times decided to bring light upon this situation. The Times did a first-of-its-kind analysis of 390 elephant fatalities at accredited U.S. zoos over the past 50 years (Berens 3). It found that most of the elephants died from injury or disease linked to conditions of their captivity, from chronic foot problems caused by standing on hard surfaces to musculoskeletal disorders from inactivity caused by being penned or chained for days and weeks at a time.
Animals in captivity tend to develop zoochosis. Zoochosis is an obsessive, repetitive behaviour, and described zoo animals behaving abnormally. Animals that are kept in captivity develop zoochosis because they don't have any companion , and they can't do the things they would out in their natural habitat. Also animals develop zoochosis because they get stressed of being in such small cages and that they are removed from being in large groups of animals and their families. “ The disruption of family or pack units for the sake of breeding is another stressor in zoos, especially in species that form close-knit groups, such as gorillas and elephants.”
According to animals rights activist, Lisa Soldavini, animals should not be kept in zoos because zoos mistreat the animals. She also says that many people wrongly believe that the animals are happy and have enough space. For example, elephants in captivity typically live half as long as those in wildlife preserves. (www.curiosity.com) Between 3000 and 5000 healthy zoo animals are killed in Europe every year according to BBC.
A zoos job is to maintain the health of an animals while bringing and conserving its species to help it from either endangerment or extinction. In doing so they need to take in all accounts of how the animals could be effected living in captivity. Zoos don’t realize that by displaying animals to the public they could be affecting their physical health. Many zoos will display the animals as clearly and close to the public as they possibly can. Allowing zoo animals to be; subject to attacks from the visitors, poisoned by materials in their enclosures, or injured in escape attempts that normally would not occur in the wild.
Being in captivity means that animals do not have the same environment as free animals. Also according to Jane Goodall elephants need more room to roam. In the article ( Pro or Con ) animales stress out when in small places. According to the video, “ Born wild” animals can be kept in a cage without a companion for a
Such as, animals that are hunted for their fur or meat. Animals are also treated with medical care in the zoos, where was if they were living in their natural habitat they would not have immediate medical care. However, argument against having zoos think by capturing the animals out of their natural habitat it disturbs the way they live. Once you put animals in a cage, it changes the atmosphere and the behavior. It also changed the way the animals mate, a specific species may start decreasing in size because they are being put into zoos all around the world.
Supporters of zoos argue that they help to conserve endangered species, but in fact they are not very good at this. Even the world famous panda-breeding programme has been very costly and unsuccessful. Also, zoo life does not prepare animals for the challenges of life in the wild. For example, two rare lynxes released into the wild in Colorado died from starvation even though the area was full of hares, which are a lynx’s natural prey.