Disclaimer: insert standard "I'm not ACD/Mofftiss", "I own nothing", "Please don't sue" disclaimer here
Summary: "I'm sorry, Sherlock, I can't do this." Molly leaves Sherlock at the altar.
A/N: Fake relationship trope inspired by "One Small Hitch" by texadian on AO3, which, btw, is AWESOME and goes the whole nine yards beginning to end, not just this little bit like mine. Seriously, check it out. NOW. you can come back to this later.
-x-x-x-x-
Cordially Invited
-x-x-x-x-
How did I let it go this far? Molly Hooper thought as she looked down the aisle of the church, past the few attendees, to the altar where Sherlock Holmes stood waiting for her.
"Ican'tdothisexcuseme," she said, her words coming out in a hurried jumble. Grabbing
…show more content…
Based on the position and drape of your gown it was obvious you were standing,” Sherlock replied, waving away her question. “Now, what do you mean by ‘it's not real’ and ‘we can't get married?’ I thought we agreed to do this.”
“Sherlock, we can't get married just because I couldn't tell my dying Mum that I broke off my engagement with Tom, whom she’d never met so it was easy to lie and just say she must have gotten his name wrong. It's not fair to you! I know you don't do feelings and that you're married to your work and I never want to get in the way of that- Sherlock!” Molly gasped as he climbed over the stall separator, dropping down in front of her.
Sherlock wrapped his arms around her and pulled her close, tucking her head under his chin. “We talked about this last week. Don’t you remember?”
“Remember what?” Molly asked as she tried to resist snuggling into him. Just the smell of him seemed to calm her immensely.
“We agreed to get married for real.”
Molly pulled away and looked at him, eyes wide, shock written all over her face.
“I admit, you argued with me a great deal,” Sherlock continued, “but when I reminded you that you are one of the few people I truly care for, and when I confessed that you are the only person I cannot imagine living my life without, you agreed, enthusiastically I might add, with
“Nick-” she reluctantly drew words. “-Did I ever tell you of the letter Myrtle sent Tom, back in Christmas, about three years ago?” I already knew I didn’t want to have this conversation. I wanted to sit and hold my breath like a toddler until I got my way and she withheld this talk with me.
This book is telling a story about two African American boys (Wes A and Wes P) who have the same name and grew up at same community, but they have a very different life. The author, Wes A, begins his life in a tough Baltimore neighborhood and end up as a Rhodes Scholar, Wall Streeter, and a white house fellow; The other Wes Moore begins at the same place in Baltimore , but ends up in prison for the rest of his life. Then why do they have the same experience, but still have a totally different life? I will agree here that environment (family environment, school education environment and society environment) is one of the biggest reasons for their different.
The proposal, we presume, happens in the poem and the unwillingness we believe to be married, is also v...
With all of the women in Holmes’ life it would seem Holmes had every opportunity given to him to settle down and live a normal life. So why would he continue down the path he was? Out of all the women in Holmes’ life it was his second wife, Myrtle Z. Bellman’s father Holmes tried to swindle and kill, he was unsuccessful (America’s Serial Killers).
Have you ever mused on your past and realized how much you've grown? It's fascinating how we change over time to become better, or worse. Tom Sawyer experienced the same growth, we as the readers are able to see and connect to Tom Sawyer as he grows.
...he met the detective, fell victim to Moriarty’s games. “Moriarty is playing with your mind too. Can’t you see what’s going on!” (Sherlock). During Holmes’ last days before his faked suicide, he pleads with John to see reason through Jim’s manipulations, as does Desdemona with Othello’s accusations. Even Sherlock’s oldest friend Detective Inspector Greg Lestrade was doubting Holmes’ credibility.
After falling deeply in love, Holmes married her first husband in 1998 with the same hopes and dreams every bride has on her wedding day. Her dreams of happiness soon turned dark, as her new husband began to abuse her both verbally and emotionally. The violence accelerates, as it so often does, and soon he was abusing her physically as well. After four years of suffering the abuse, her faith gave her the courage to leave him, taking her young son with her.
The Turn of the Screw by Henry James has been the cause of many debates about whether or not the ghosts are real, or if this is a case of a woman with psychological disturbances causing her to fabricate the ghosts. The story is told in the first person narrative by the governess and is told only through her thoughts and perceptions, which makes it difficult to be certain that anything she says or sees is reliable. It starts out to be a simple ghost story, but as the story unfolds it becomes obvious that the governess has jumps to conclusions and makes wild assumptions without proof and that the supposed ghosts are products of her mental instability which was brought on by her love of her employer
“Justice cannot be for one side alone, but must be for both” (Roosevelt). The goal of America’s legal system as we know it is that everyone is given an equal opportunity to stick up for what they may or may not have done, as described by former first lady Eleanor Roosevelt. Also this is what officials strive for, it is not always the case. Facts can be skewed, distorted, or misrepresented to make one side seem to be guilty without a doubt and to make the other side seem as if they have done nothing wrong. The Crucible by Arthur Miller begins and ends with one-sided accusations of witchcraft. It all results from a group of girls who had been dancing in the woods. After two fall sick, the accusations begin. The girls who were dancing, especially Abigail Williams begin blaming others to look less guilty themselves. Accusations are flying left and right so that soon, hundreds are in jail and over a dozen are executed. Abby’s main goal is to get rid of Elizabeth Proctor, so she can be with John Proctor, a man she previously had an affair with. However, John is not interested in Abby and his
Witch hunts” constantly reoccur throughout history - in 1600s, 1953 and in 2014. Good morning, fellow directors. Today, I want to demonstrate that “the crucible” by Arthur Miller in 1953 is not just a play for 1953, but a play that relates to any period of time, notably to our modern society. The crucible is an allegory of 1953 McCarthyism and social chaos of the time. Today’s government manipulated the truth creates the fear of “outlawed bikies gangs” similar to 1692 theocratic government creates fear of witches and McCarthy’s communist terror. Unfortunately, the truth is never clear cut, but skewed, twisted and sculpted lies that shockingly benefit a small governing body and its ideologies. Therefore, ‘The Crucible’ is a worthwhile play to be shown in Queensland Theatre as it reminds us of an invaluable lesson and could prevent the same foolish action reoccurring on future generations. The play intertwines with significant themes such as lies, truth, power, stereotypes and mass hysteria which are pivotal dynamics in today’s society.
“Man masters nature not by force but by understanding. This is why science has succeeded where magic failed: because it has looked for no spell to cast over nature”. From the beginning of time man and nature has been in conflict with one another because, as a whole, there is no cooperating. Each one tirelessly wants its way. The Man is fighting for dominance and nature w never yielding its authority. In American Literature, many authors illustrate this theme in their writing. Specifically the writers Jack London in The Law Of Life, Stephen Crane The Open Boat and Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Fin. Each explores the relationship between humans and nature but with slightly different methods. Mark Twain uses nature in a realistic way, Jack London in a naturalistic way and Stephen Crane constitutes a combination of both.
from again. Upon learning of his defeat at the hands of a woman. Sherlock Holmes shocked that
...After the proposal they talk about their past relationship by having a very benign conversation, and many misunderstandings are cleared “In vain I have struggled. It will not do. My feelings for you will not be repressed. You must allow me to tell you how ardently I admire and love you” (Austen 179).Their marriage is presented in a positive light because they have had to work hard to achieve it.
In Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen shows examples of how most marriages were not always for love but more as a formal agreement arranged by the two families. Marriage was seen a holy matrimony for two people but living happil...
When Elizabeth Bennet refuses to marry the dim-witted and unattractive Mr. Collins, her mother is inconsolable. She bursts into a fit and tells Elizabeth that if she doesn't marry Mr. Collins, then she will disown her as a daughter. Mr. Bennet at this point steps in and provides the ironic relief. An unhappy alternative is before you, Elizabeth. From this day on, you must be a stranger to one of your parents.