Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of religion
The importance of religion
What is the importance of religion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of religion
Religion should not make people feel as if they are forced to live a certain way, but it should be used as a way of thinking/deciding between right and wrong. No one is perfect and no one knows everything. That is why with religion, we are able to understand more than what is known. How does religion, work? “Starting with magic and religion, which views the world simply as an extension of the human mind, we eventually reach the age of science, in which we view the world as being ruled by universal laws” (Grey 1). This explains how and why science can easily replace religion. Religion for many people is a great support system for the disadvantaged, especially for those who are going through a lot in life. Not only that, but when people are …show more content…
suffering from cancers, turning to religion to cope could actually prolong their life. “According to a 2009 study, researchers interviewed 345 late staged cancer patients, and assessed their spirituality up through their death. The rate of resuscitation was 74% for those with a high level of religious coping, versus 1.8% with low levels” (Mazziotta 1). Only faith counts is a great way to put it, how much you believe something will really work even if it is nonsense, how you use that ability (faith) is the key. Faith is the start of it all; faith is a gracious tool when getting involved with religion. Whatever it is you believe in or worship is perfectly fine as long as you’re not taking that faith and forcing it on others. Religion is perfect if you just want something to hope in or to even relieve stress. “A 1998 study found that religiously active older adults are 40% less likely to have high blood pressure than those who are less active” (Mazziotta 1). It may not be much of a change, but it’s the little things that make the biggest difference. What is religion and how can it be used in both negative ways and positive ways? A lot of people look at religion as just heaven or hell. When we die something happens to us, whether we ascend up into some kind of heaven, get reincarnated into something else or simply just cease to exist. Why is it, so many are concerned about the personal religious views others have? “If everyone kept their beliefs private, practiced them in the appropriate places and didn’t judge others who believed differently-can you imagine how much more peaceful the world would be” (Clifton 1). If we worked together as one single person instead of separating ourselves because of things that we see and don’t like about one or another, then we would be able to do the impossible. Alone, yes of course we can do anything that we are mentally/physically able to do, but when we come together we can’t be stopped. “It’s one group of humans telling another group that they’re wrong” (Clifton 1). “At the end of the day, no matter what it is we believe, or what we think is truer. How we are judged as humans will and should be decided by our actions, not by the opinion of some stranger who disagrees with what you believe or say” (Clifton 1) “It’s easy to take a group with like-minded beliefs, group them together and manipulate them for some type of ulterior gain” (Clifton 1). Another thing a lot of people also do is overlook religion; it’s about how we live and choose to act in any situation, not what we believe. Religion is the ultimate tool for creating peace… “Bringing the spiritual dimension into the peacemaking process to the more deep-seated, affective base of the party’s behavior, enabling them to examine critically their own attitudes and actions” (Smock 1). As stated, this is exactly how we are able to create peace with religion; although you must really take religion seriously to see the results and to notice the changes religion brings. Also stated,” Two critical elements important in peace making are empathy and compassion” (Smock 1). Your state of mind is everything. “Not all cases here describe dramatic success stories, but provide experiences and lessons that are instructive for religious peacemaking” (Smock 1). Many people jump between science and religion when trying to find answers to questions we know nothing about. Can religion tell us more than science?
“We tend to assume that religion is a question of what we believe or don’t believe. It’s an assumption with a long history in philosophy, which has been reinforced in recent years by the dull debate of atheism” (Gray 1). Science has given us many benefits, so many that it would be hard just to name them. The only problem is science can’t save the human species from itself. Science inquiry is probably one of the best methods we have today for figuring out how the world works. “As of now, we know a lot more than we ever have and what we know will only increase as time goes by, actually if we know anything it’s that our current theories are filled with errors and that we will still continue to use those theories to until we find a better alternative” (Grey 1) Science isn’t about belief anymore then religion is. “Religion is then not fundamentally different from science; both are like attempts to frame true beliefs about the world. That way of thinking tends to see science and religion as rivals, and it then becomes tempting to conclude that there’s no longer any need for religion” (Grey 1). If science produces theories that we can use without believing them, religion is just a bunch of gathering myths. Point intended you don’t have to believe a theory is true in order to use it. Just like you don’t have to believe a story is true for it to give a special meaning to your life. In other words, to believe in religion and to have faith in the things that you can’t see is completely up to you. Precisely, religion is a powerful tool for peace and enlightenment, but a negative tool when used for manipulation. To achieve peace, we must first submit to the unknown, and eliminate all negative intentions through religion. Religion not only affects someone’s way of thinking, but it affects our decision making ability and exactly how we choose to make that decision. In addition, you can relate the way religion is used in novels and the way
the characters react to their situations; good or bad. With some of life’s struggles or as some may say life’s tests. Not only can you relate religion to certain books/novels, but you can relate religion to many other things and many different topics like science.
Even if the most educated scientists state how their denial of God is correct, I rather stand with God and be judged by the world than stand with the world and be judged by God. According to Jack Miles essay, “Why God will not die,” he states how “Scientific progress is like mountain climbing; the higher you climb, the more you know.” (Miles 4) Even if this is true, what does science teach you about moral? Do good for the sake of humanity and don 't worry about your sins or mistakes because there is no point of anything we do- this reminds me of John Caputo’s point that if we 're living without God, we are living without a purpose. Why would I write this paper if I’m not going to get graded on it? Why should I live my life if I won 't get judged on it during the Day of Judgment? Miles implies that religion is for the weak. Religion is for those who are strong enough to believe in something that cannot be seen or proven, but stands for the rewardable goodness in the
Science and Religion dialogue has been a bitter-sweet topic for many people over the years. The controversy is not only common between one sole community, but affects a variety. The beliefs held about these topics has the potential to personally effect an individual, whether it be positively or negatively. In the United States, we draw only a fine line between religion and science, often failing to realize that the two benefit each other in copious ways but are not meant to interpreted in the same way. Due to this perspective, people seem to be influenced to pick one or the other, when in reality we should treat both science and religion with the same respect and recognize that they are completely separate from one another, along with having individual purposes. John F. Haught, a distinguished research professor at Georgetown University, published a book titled, “Science & Religion: From Conflict to Conversation”. In it he evaluates each side, persuading the reader that the truth is that both realms may benefit from each other despite the differences emphasized. John F. Haught introduces his audience with four approaches on Science and Religion. Haught’s third approach, contact, is of major significance to aid in the response of: “Does Science Rule out a Personal God?”
Throughout history, conflicts between faith and reason took the forms of religion and free thinking. In the times of the Old Regime, people like Copernicus and Galileo were often punished for having views that contradicted the beliefs of the church. The strict control of the church was severely weakened around the beginning of the nineteenth century when the Old Regime ended. As the church's control decreased, science and intellectual thinking seemed to advance. While the people in the world became more educated, the church worked harder to maintain its influential position in society and keep the Christian faith strong. In the mid-nineteenth century, the church's task to keep people's faith strong became much harder, due to theories published by free thinkers like Charles Darwin, Charles Lyell, David Friedrich Strauss, and others. These men published controversial theories that hammered away at the foundation on which the Christian church was built. As the nineteenth century progressed, more doubts began to arise about the basic faiths of the Christian church.
“The lack of conflict between science and religion arises from a lack of overlap between their respective domains of professional expertise—science in the empirical constitution of the universe, and religion in the search for proper ethical values and the spiritual meaning of our lives. The attainment of wisdom in a full life requires extensive attention to both domains—for a great book tells us that the truth can make us free and that we will live in optimal harmony with our fellows when we learn to do justly, love mercy, and walk humbly.”
In recent research, I have discovered that some people think that science and Christianity cannot go together and some may argue that science and Christianity may go hand and hand. This paper is going to discuss what science is. It will give information about the areas of which science cannot give information. My personal opinion, on the reasons the average person considers science as applicable to everything, will also be discussed. Lastly, I will cover some implications to the Christian regarding the limits of science.
Science VS. God – The God Question is a documentary exploring the existence of an all-powerful creator in the midst of different evidences spanning from the origin of the cosmos, evolution of living beings and human consciousness and spirituality. This is an ongoing debate among world class scientists, theologians, philosophers, biologists and other learned people. The documentary brings to light opposing points of view, hence letting the viewer see the opposing sides from an unbiased eye. I believe Science and God can meet at a crossroads and interact with each other. Both are means to discover reality and complement the other well.
Religion and science are complementary elements to our society. The notion that religion and science should not be merged together, does not mean neglecting to understand the parallel relation between these two concepts and will result in a better understanding of our surroundings. This will put an end to our scientific research and advancement because we will be relying on answers provided by religious books to answer our questions. If we don’t argue whether these answers are right or wrong, we would never have studied space stars or the universe or even our environment and earthly animals. These studies have always provided us with breakthroughs, inventions and discoveries that made our lives better.
In Introducing Philosophy of Religion, Chad Meister asserts “there are several components (that) seem to be central to the world religion: a system of beliefs, the breaking in of a transcendent reality, and human attitudes of ultimate concern, meaning and purpose” (Meister 6). Throughout my life, I feel that religion is one of the core social belief systems that people use to maintain what they feel is a good way to live. Giving them a sense of purpose or fulfillment during their earthly life, most hoping whatever beliefs that have will help them after death. Even though there are many different religions or religious value systems, everyone has most likely been exposed to one or more. There is only 15% of the world’s population that do not believe in one type of religion or another (Meister, 7).
In the book, Faith vs. Fact: Why Science and Religion Are Incompatible by Coyne, he explains how religion and science do not go hand in hand at all. He explains that there are many differences between the two fields but holds science as the upper hand between the two. In chapter two of the book, he explains how religion mostly believes all of their doctrines and faith-driven information to be true and all other types of information false. He claims that science is much more focused on the “truth about the universe.” As a scientist himself, he has experienced first hand as to how science is nowhere compatible with religion and that science and religion have different goals, which can never intertwine. Coyne exemplifies that with science,
...wever, in the best interest of advancing education and an enlightened society, science must be pursued outside of the realm of faith and religion. There are obvious faith-based and untestable aspects of religion, but to interfere and cross over into everyday affairs of knowledge should not occur in the informational age. This overbearing aspect of the Church’s influence was put in check with the scientific era, and the Scientific Revolution in a sense established the facet of logic in society, which allows us to not only live more efficiently, but intelligently as well. It should not take away from the faith aspect of religion, but serve to enhance it.
At first glance, many facets of science and religion seem to be in direct conflict with each other. Because of this, I have generally kept them confined to separate spheres in my life. I have always thought that science is based on reason and cold, hard facts and is, therefore, objective. New ideas have to be proven many times by different people to be accepted by the wider scientific community, data and observations are taken with extreme precision, and through journal publications and papers, scientists are held accountable for the accuracy and integrity of their work. All of these factors contributed to my view of science as objective and completely truthful. Religion, on the other hand, always seems fairly subjective. Each person has their own personal relationship with God, and even though people often worship as a larger community with common core beliefs, it is fine for one person’s understanding of the Bible and God to be different from another’s. Another reason that Christianity seems so subjective is that it is centered around God, but we cannot rationally prove that He actually exists (nor is obtaining this proof of great interest to most Christians). There are also more concrete clashes, such as Genesis versus the big bang theory, evolution versus creationism, and the finality of death versus the Resurrection that led me to separate science and religion in my life. Upon closer examination, though, many of these apparent differences between science and Christianity disappeared or could at least be reconciled. After studying them more in depth, science and Christianity both seem less rigid and inflexible. It is now clear that intertwined with the data, logic, and laws of scien...
Some religions even go to the extent of persecuting people who have different beliefs. Scientist have argued that religion was created to give humanity rules and to help turn these early human savages into proper, domesticated people. If someone were to break these rules, they would be meat with an “unimaginable punishment.” “Religion is like a drug to some. And they need a 2000 year old hero to save them – from themselves that is!”
Barbour writes, “Changing cultural presuppositions also affect perception of what is significant in the social world.” (pg.137) It becomes so simple to say that science and religion are completely different, and while they may share differences I think that it is unfair to say that science and religion are separate from one another. If careful consideration is taken you can take notice that may issues that arise in the Bible such as consuming red meat, banning pork, discarding fat within meat are all backup by scientific facts. Issues that arise within science such as Einstein’s seven invisible dimension that are left unexplained, however many religion believe in the seven levels of “the heavens”, “the invisible”, “the afterlife”, and “the everlasting”. Issues such as the ones mentioned above are ones that connect science and religion on such as deeper level than many care to reveal. I think that it is fair to say that both science and religion have become so reluctant in their own stubborn, self-centered ideologies. Both science and religion have become so consumed in their own ideologies, and understandings that neither allows attention from the others research of teachings. I whole heartedly believe that if science and religion were used to approve one another rather than disprove one another there could be more of a mutual balance and connection between the two. There are numerous similarities in the processes that are taken when achieving new understandings, and knowledge. Also if we allowed ourselves to be honest if science and religion worked together rather than against each other there could be so many new discoveries that could be made, and so many debates that could be put to rest. Like I mentioned before but I think it is important, it either side stopped trying to disprove one another and rather
There is an estimation of a total of 8.7 million species on Earth and at least 10,000 more discovered each year on Earth. One such species, known as the African unicorn or the okapi, has a surprising background in history. An adequate amount of humans would not guess that this mysterious creature was not a living relative of the giraffe. To acknowledge how such diversity of species on this planet arose, we must look at the tree of life, or evolution. Evolution is the adaptations in external and internal characteristics of groups of plants, animals, and fungi after sizeable passage of generations.
First off, it is important to realize that religion and science have to be related in some way, even if it is not the way I mentioned before. If religion and science were completely incompatible, as many people argue, then all combinations between them would be logically excluded. That would mean that no one would be able to take a religious approach to a scientific experiment or vice versa. Not only does that occur, but it occurs rather commonly. Scientists often describe their experiments and writings in religious terms, just as religious believers support combinations of belief and doubt that are “far more reminiscent of what we would generally call a scientific approach to hypotheses and uncertainty.” That just proves that even though they are not the same, religion and science have to be related somehow.