Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gun control laws do not reduce gun violence
Pros and cons of gun controls in usa for school essay
Pros and cons of gun controls in usa for school essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gun control laws do not reduce gun violence
Pro Gun vs. Anti Gun
There are two sides to this argument people who use guns and like them and people who don't like guns and have only heard or seen people use them for bad things like robbing,killing,or just trying to threaten somebody.Guns aren't used for just bad things that's the irresponsible gun owners I use the words gun owners very loosely because according to The Washington Times most of those guns are stolen mainly out of vehicles or bought illegally from some dealer in a back alley because when you buy a pistol legally most dealers make you go through a very extensive process before the gun is actually considered yours there is a lot of paperwork you need to get done and when the gun is put together before distributing to the
…show more content…
stores the distributor fires two bullets from it and they collect both one is put in the case with the gun so you know what bullets shot from that gun look like and one is given to the law enforcement so they can compare it in the future through ballistics if a murder has occurred with that type of gun so if someone buys from a legal distributor it's not a loose transaction they know who bought it and they know from whom they bought it.There are senators and other big people trying to ban all types of guns saying they are used for nothing but evil and the world would be a better place without them and throw out very wildly generated stats for how many americans are killed because of guns and they try to trick people by throwing out a law they want to make and depending on the people not to read the whole thing they have written for it and at the end of the paragraph it adds something else about banning certain types of guns like a policy to make open carry illegal in a certain state and then at the end of it they put something like this policy will also ban double stacked magazines for pistols and all other firearms if it were straight forward some things proposed aren't that bad of rules and in the end they are politicians so most things they create have some kind of turn to them that affects more than what it should have affected.
There are laws that people are trying to get passed that would make it illegal for people to carry guns in public rather it be concealed carry or open carry that might help in some cases with shootings on the streets and stuff but what that would do is it would hurt the majority which is law abiding citizens who want to obey the laws and be protected by the police and any other form of protection who want to know if they needed to they could protect themselves,there family or anybody else around them if they have to if guns are made illegal they can't do that and if guns are illegal the people breaking the law already aren't going to care if carrying a gun is illegal they are already robbing,murdering or whatever else they were going to do making guns illegal is just another law they would break and if guns were taken away completely from people laws would still be broken people would still be killed and robbed the attackers would just find other weapons like bats,knives,clubs,explosives,or just fists the U.S. murder rate with guns from 2010-2014 was 8124 and death by other methods like knives,drowning,strangulation and even explosives was 3837 so even if guns are outlawed there's still many other methods people could use that could be way worse of a way to die i'm not saying getting shot anywhere is a good way to die but i'd rather be shot then stabbed or blown up or clubbed I think it would hurt a lot less.The second amendment states that The right of …show more content…
the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed which means our guns can't be taken away by anyone so all of the people trying to make laws that take guns away are going against the constitution I don't care if laws are passed to make it safer or laws that are made to protect citizens but making laws to completely take away guns isn't needed these laws are supposed to be made to protect every day citizens but what about the everyday citizens that believe responsible citizens who carry guns are what keeps them safe Georgia has passed a new gun bill that has upsides for citizens who own guns legally but it also has a downside for the state's police and government the good side is it is know legal for legal gun owners to carry a gun in a bar,a church,airports and government buildings as long as it isn't a secure government building like atlanta city hall or the georgia state capitol but if the bar owner or church clearly say or have it posted it can still be illegal if you have a gun in there building and the airport won't let you go past TSA with a gun but up to TSA you can have a gun and TSA will take the gun and you can go to a certain place and get it back when you come back through and the down side to the law is georgia has no database of gun owners know and the stopped making gun owners give fingerprints when renewing a weapon carry permit which means any body can renew it as long as they have the right requirements and there's no way of knowing if that is the true owner of the permit.
There has to be boundaries for guns it can't just be a rule less state of things where you can do anything you want with them whenever you want because then if something like a fight were to happen and someone were shot the shooter could have claimed that the area wasn't posted no guns allowed and he was defending himself so then he would probably get off with no charges and would be able to do it again if it were a lawless subject their would probably be a lot more firearm incidents occurring in the world either.Just a few days ago their was a school shooting in San Bernardino California where a deranged man shot and killed his wife who was a teacher in the elementary school and the bullet went through and hit a boy behind her and then proceeded to kill himself and the boy who was critically wounded later died that is a grade A story that makes people feel guns are evil and should be banned and that is a horrible incident because that was the second school shooting in 18 months which is why I think schools should have metal detectors like airports do and if unless someone enters the school from a certain entrance and exit strictly for students then they have to go through the detectors and that is also a good reason why if guns are banned that's not going to stop someone from killing another human being because murder is illegal mass murder is illegal and bringing a firearm into any school area is also illegal but it is still done so just one more little
hurdle for them to go around by buying an illegal gun or stealing a gun from somewhere so they can kill.So in conclusion gun control isn't necessarily a horrible thing there has to be a little bit of control to stop the idiots but total gun control won't solve all the problems.
Left, right, Liberal, Conservative, Democratic, Republican. There are a lot of synonyms for the sides of our nation divided. Divided on many things: religion, political views, morals, etc.. For a nation that prides ourselves on extraordinary security and unity, it is quite ironic that so many issues can cause such distress and uproar within communities. One such issue is gun control. As a white male in a middle-lower class family that has never owned a gun, I may be somewhat biased. Objectively as I can, I am going to report the facts and more importantly, try to find the core issues at play.
The debate over firearms has been polarized for too long. Gun law is a never-ending issue because there hardly is any true debate. Americans (and even gun owners) do support the governments efforts to make sure guns are less dangerous in violent hands, but that is the main problem-the guns getting in the wrong human hands. Millions of law-abiding Americans do own and do enjoy their guns. But criminals and sometimes-disconcerted kids often use firearms to kill. The use of firearms has increased tremendously. An average day in Los Angeles is four people dying in a gun related crime and the United States faces approximately 87 deaths a day. There are more than 200 million guns in circulation in the United States and if you don’t own a firearm, chances are that your neighbor or friend does (Fineman 27). Sure, the Founding Fathers incorporated the Second Amendment as “the right to keep and bear arms,” but it did not give the distinction of using guns to kill more children and people than anywhere in the world.
“A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The right of all Americans to bear arms is a right the Founding Fathers held to equal importance as the Constitution itself. Gun control laws directly violate this right and therefore should not even be under consideration. Even if that issue is overlooked, gun control advocates state that in order to reduce firearm related violence, gun control laws must be implemented to remove the violence caused by firearms. Although this may seem reasonable, the consequences of such laws are ironically counterproductive; they exacerbate the problem instead of fixing it. Besides the fact that the American Constitution guarantees its citizens the right to bear arms, the idea of restricting gun ownership in order to reduce firearm-related violence would ultimately fail given the previous experiments of gun control in England and in numerous states.
Right now the government has limited firearm purchasing only to people who pass certain steps. Gun control has risen as a controversial subject in the United States today. Many say gun control or banning of all firearms will help protect and make our country a better place. Reasons many are wanting to ban firearms are that the 2nd amendment is out dated and unjustified in this date and time. Writer Eugene Robinson states that “farmers wrote of “arms,” thinking about muskets and single shot pistols. They could not have foreseen modern rifles or high-capacity magazines.” Many agree with Mr. Robinson saying that back when the constitution was written they couldn’t have understood what was going to come in the future. Citizens also believe people have no reason to fight against intruders that come in their home that’s what the authorities are for. If people what to defend themselves why waste the money and time on having police? In this day and age why have weapons why not cut out all firearms and just be one happy country, it’s that simple, but is it really that simple? (“Assault Weapons Must Be Banned in
People have questioned gun control long time. Many people wonder if anyone, aside from those who join the law force, should be allowed to carry guns. Benjamin Franklin once said, “Those who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety” (Wright 4). Franklin understood that taking guns away from law-abiding citizens would not uphold their liberty. Some people who argue for gun control state many violent crimes involve guns. Others believe a child could find the gun and something bad could happen to the child or others when a gun is unsafely stored. People who argue against gun control might say there is a huge psychological gap between citizens who shoot to protect themselves or their property and those who go into schools and shoot at others. Criminals will always find a way around gun control laws and will be able to obtain and use guns illegally. The second amendment protects gun rights for individual citizens. Reasonable gun control laws and educational steps can be taken to protect the majority of U.S. citizens. Gun control does not only take guns away from criminals, gun control also limits law-abiding citizens from protecting themselves and their families when necessary.
Take a look at the history of our country and the role guns have played in it. According to the second amendment gun ownership is perfectly legal and guaranteed as a right. There were and are good reasons for this, luckily they are still practiced today. Back in the day guns used to be for hunting and, on the occasion self defense. But when the colonists of this country had enough of British rule, they picked up there own personal guns and went to war and the British saw first hand how powerful the rough band of average American gun owners were. Our forefathers knew that the general population if armed would be key in winning the war. And it was.
Gun control, in and of itself, is not evil or even a bad idea. The biggest issue is that, for the most part, it is not particularly successful.
Like Mr. Cuellar said “ Being an US Customs I know any one with a gun in a shooting will help out to, there is more good people then bad and together we can take them down , that’s why I am with guns allowed in school campus , for the reason that I am also a father and care for the safety of my family members”. As he mentioned it can also be protection for oneself when you encounter a problematic situation. There are good reasons why we should allow them but there is more bad ones than good. Some people say that they’ll feel more protective if they have a gun with them , knowing someone you don’t know has one. If guns would be allowed under strictly rules and would have a lot of training and permissions / test people have to go through maybe like that I will be safe in school with guns
Guns debate you. More gun control laws would not reduce gun deaths it would increase gun deaths because we need self. If we had more laws on guns the population of guns with criminals would shoot up. People need guns to protect their families and themselves. People need guns to survive with other deadly people in the world. The NRA is against this person who is trying to put these laws in. (Hillary Clinton) People need guns. I say this because the Military uses guns to protect themselves. Why should we not. We need guns in our lives they help protect your family and mine.
Gun control is an awfully big issue in the United States today. Many people in America don’t agree with the gun control laws that they have today. Gun control laws only take guns and freedom away from law-abiding citizens. Many citizens have their own reasons for owning a gun. Why would the government want to make it harder for people to own a gun? People that own guns aren’t very likely to be attacked by criminals. Owning a handgun is one of the best ways of protection when used correctly. The second amendment states “the right to bear arms”; does this grant everyone the right to own a gun? Gun control laws have not been proven to do anything for citizens. Gun control laws just make it harder for the good guy average Joe to own a gun. Gun control laws are not a good idea, and are taking part in the loss of our freedom that was given to us.
Gun violence in America is a public health crisis, which needs to be recognized and changed by legislatures, and the voting American. As conscious Americans, we need to vote for changes to gun laws that would improve background checks nation-wide, make firearm registration mandatory, restrict the sale of assault weapons and weapon modifications that give the shooter military-grade fire power, and invest in gun-safe technology and safe firearms storage designs. This type of technology will help prevent criminally oriented people from accessing guns, and will help prevent the accidental deaths of many children by guns. This essay will explain the reforms needed to help ensure Americans can still exercise their 2nd amendment right of owning firearms, and preventing the unnecessary deaths of many Americans at the same time.
Supporters on this side say that without guns in our system, less homicides will happen and shooters will have a harder time finding weapons to use. This perspective does deliver a thought-provoking fight; according to chicagotribune.com, from January 1st, 2015- October 8, 2015, over 2,360 people were victims of shooting in Chicago and in an article from CNN.com, in Australia, a country where guns are banned, the risk of being killed by a gunshot has dropped over 50% since a tight gun control laws were established. Although a ban on guns seems like a great decision, there are many downfalls that will come with this policy. On Washingtonpost.com, a Gallop Poll was done and showed that 51% of people felt safer in homes with a gun. If guns became banned, the percentage would drop, and criminals, like rapists or burglars would have more motivation to commit crimes. In Australia, a country with extremely tight gun control, the rate of sexual assaults is 28.6% and in America, a country with loose gun control, the rate is 27.3%, so it is obvious that if America were to ban guns, the rate would increase. Another repercussion that results in taking away guns is actually more violence happening. According to politifact.com, in 1976, Washington DC required for all new handguns at home to be stored unloaded and disassembled at home. This led criminals into committing more crimes because they knew that the
The debate over gun control in America has constantly brought up over the years due to gunmen killing large amounts of civilizations in shootings. From Columbine to Sandy Hook or the shootings of the two reporters in West Virginia, these public shootings are occurring everywhere. Lawmakers and civilians alike are pushing for increased gun control in hopes of preventing the same tragedies. Anybody that has been affected by the shootings have been pushing Congress and state governments to force new sanctions on government. With the past three years, Congress has shot down all the laws despite the large amounts of public support. Adding more gun control isn’t going to stop the mass shootings from happening.
Listverse,. '10 Arguments For Gun Control - Listverse '. N.p., 2014. Web. 30 Oct. 2014.
Why You Should Keep Your Gun Rights What would you do if someone broke in and you didn’t have any self defense? If gun rights were removed from everyone, then people wouldn’t be able to use self defense if there was a break-in or something of that nature. As long as people with guns do not have felony charges, then they should not have gun rights removed. It is fun to skeet shoot and competition shoot, maybe a little bit of hunting, but no one would be able to do that without gun rights.