Argumentative Essay On The Crucible By Arthur Miller

582 Words2 Pages

Literary analysis/ argumentative essay
A judge's job is to serve out justice to their community. There are three characters in the crucible by Arthur Miller that basically controlled the decision of people's lives in Salem. Due to those three a lot of innocent people died. Although those characters had a weighty job they did not execute their jobs correctly. Reverend Parris, judge Hathorne, and judge Danforth were blind to the truth of no witchcraft in Salem.
Hathornes reasoning is very incorrect for a judge. Hes stating that just because Martha corey is reading books she's a witch. “...martha corey, there is abundant evidence in our hands to show that you have given yourself to the reading of fortunes do you dent it?” hathorne asks martha corey during her trial. She then says “ I am innocent to a witch. I know not what a witch is.” he then replies as if he has a mind of a child “ how do you know, then, that you are not a witch?” (Miller pg 83). This just goes to show you that his …show more content…

“Peace, judge Hathorne. Do you know who I am, Mr.Nurse?”(pg 89) No judge needs to show confidence like that, especially in a serious matter like this. He just proved that he's more focused on himself then the situation. “I judge Nothing. I tell you mister, I have seen marvels in this court. I have seen people choked before my eyes by spirits; i have seen them stuck by pins and slashed by daggers. I have until this moment not the slightest reason to suspect that the children may be deceiving me.” Danforth tells Proctor with all confidence (pg 91). John Proctor gave judge danforth evidence to work on against witchcraft but judge Danforth is still blind. The decisions that he already made wouldn't let him change his mind because people already died because of it. Judge danforth never ceased the opportunity to open his head and realize the truth but instead he's still was blind to the

Open Document