Argumentative Essay On Lord Of The Flies

1330 Words3 Pages

Summative Essay “The line between good and evil is permeable and almost anyone can be induced to cross it when pressured by situational forces.” Philip Zimbardo stated. However, knowing this, to what extent is this applicable? It is plausible that an innocent child, not yet tainted by the outside world, can become as cruel of a dictator as Benito Mussolini was in the right environment? William Golding’s novel Lord of the Flies chronicles the life of a group of British boys who find themselves stranded on a deserted island with an absolute lack of authority. The novel explores topics such as the inherent evil of mankind, as well as the loss of innocence. The article “Herd Behavior” by CommonLit Staff illustrates the mentality of an individual …show more content…

With this new presence of traditional authority, Jack’s position of power is questioned. Golding explains this by writing, “A little boy who wore the remains of an extraordinary black cap on his red hair and who carried the remains of a pair of spectacles at his waist, started forward, then changed his mind and stood still.” (Golding 284). Once the naval officer arrives at the island, there is an almost instant decline of the savage behavior previously shown in the novel. While Jack is described as still showing remnants of his previous rule, the attendance of the naval officer immediately undermines and overshadows any authority Jack previously held. This shows how an increase in authority can eliminate any of the savage behavior caused by the initial lack of authority and structure. In the article “The Stanford Prison Experiment,” university students were assigned the roles of either prisoner or guard. Once they got their roles, they began acting much differently than they had previously. This is stated through the quote, “Within hours of beginning the experiment some guards began to harass prisoners. They behaved in a brutal and sadistic manner, apparently enjoying

Open Document