Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Branches of American government
Role and function of judges
Role and function of judges
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Branches of American government
The justice of peace and judge are to be elected officials who are unbiased with their decisions in the court of law. “Judges are not executive branch officials, as are prosecutors and law enforcement officers. Judges are part of the judiciary, a separate and independent branch of government.” (Hall, 2015 p.346). I believe judges and justices are appointed in order to endorse a political agenda or viewpoint. In my short experience I have noticed that the person that wins an election is based off of popularity. I think it is safe to say that judges are appointed by a state governor based off their professionalism in court how well they were able to represent their clients as the appointed lawyer. I think in a place where the population is not
overwhelming that it would be easier to appoint a judge without any political agenda or viewpoint to endorse. It is imperative that whoever is on the bench the community can trust. During the presidential campaign there are numerous debates that thousands attend and millions watch on television. In order to have an effective judge or justice of the peace, I would like to see political standpoints and decision making discussed in regards to past criminal cases that left a bookmark in history as being tried unfairly. This will allow the community to be able to see where the candidates stand with their morals and ethics. Whether or not they will have a true desire stand behind the law and to complete the job as fair as possible. This can eliminate the political backbone and solely rely on focusing on the bigger picture in eyes, which is upholding the criminal justice system without bias.
It is simple to be confused by the federal court judges and their decisions and how they go about them and how they are in their position. Personally, I always thought they were elected by the Supreme Court or someone or something higher than them. But I was very surprised to know that they were appointed (assigned a job or role to). This leaves the judges from having to go through a process of campaigning and running against others. Although by being unelected officials it has both pros and cons. Pros being, that they are trusted enough to handle cases that go to this point and being able to make a decision under the law to better the society. Cons being, if a federal court judge makes any misdemeanor or crime they have the ability to be impeached
In the introduction, the author has done a good job engaging the audience with emotions, and painting a vivid scene of the seals being slaughtered. This essay does a good job of acknowledging the other point of views. This essay also has a good, clear sense of structure. The author has a strong thesis statement, that gave a clear indication of what the following paragraphs are about.
The following is an adjusted version of an argument I presented in Critical Thinking last semester. My opinion has not changed, just expanded.. :)
For years now, incarceration has been known to be the center of the nation’s Criminal Justice Center. It’s no secret that over time, the criminal justice center began experiencing problems with facilities being overcrowded, worldwide, which ended up with them having to make alternative decisions to incarceration that prevent violence and strengthen communities. These new options went in to plan to be help better develop sentencing criminal offenders.
The epic poem, Beowulf, a work of fiction, offers more insight into Ancient Anglo-Saxon English culture than the work of Bede, who wrote, A History of the English Church and People. The epic poem Beowulf gives an enhanced illustration and clearer understanding of the culture of the Ancient Anglo-Saxon’s. The epic poem gives the audience a picture of what the Ancient Anglo-Saxon English valued; seafaring, warriors, heroes, and paganism.
Sometimes it leaves red raw scars that will eventually fade into silver marks- blemishes that will never leave you. Someday the memories will be in loud colour but sometimes you might remember it in muted black and white –it doesn’t matter what shade the memories are; you will never forget.
Capital Punishment is a very controversial topic, there is both irrefutable and critical evidence that supports capital punishment. There is a plethora of inquiry you can ask yourself such as, what kind of limitations are there? How much are we really willing to spend on executions and does the cost outweigh its benefits? Then there is one question that everyone asks, is there credible evidence that supports that capital punishment does in fact deter crime. Based on the evidence there in fact is credible evidence that supports that capital punishment does deter crime.
Capital Punishment has been a controversial issue in society for centuries. It stands as a significant topic in our community due to its ambiguity in creating and maintaining a less vulnerable society. Skeptics of Capital Punishment are against it in the case of supposedly moral grounds such as wrongfully accusing the subject of the crime as well as the suggestion that human life should be a right for everyone and no one should have the capability to deprive anyone of it. Others argue that it is a highly justifiable method of punishment in serious criminal cases and that society would become a more guarded place if it were more prominently enforced. As a result of the controversy revolving around Capital Punishment, it has been abolished in many countries but remains intact in some. In regards to the positive effects of Capital Punishment, it should be the preferred method of penalizing murderers compared to a lifetime jail sentence, as it protects society, is the most justifiable manner of punishment and warns potential murderers.
...ies. Depending on the states’ political culture, the judge is elected through popular election either with partisan or nonpartisan elections. The political culture of the state affects the judges’ capabilities to make decisions. Judges are to uphold strict interpretation based on past precedent but it is difficult with social pressure. For example, moralistic Massachusetts passed civic unions for gays, however, in traditionalistic state Georgia would likely deny gay rights.
Whether a judge should be elected or appointed has been a topic for discussion since the creation of a judicial system. Depending on what side of the decision one may be on, there are some challenges that arise from each side. If a judge is elected, will he be judicious in his decision based on the law or based on his constituents? If the judge is appointed, will he be subject to the authority that appointed him, thereby slanting his decision to keep favor of the executive or legislator that appointed him? Mandatory retirement is also a question that brings about challenges. How old is too old? When does a judge become ineffective based on their age?
People often times single me out for being a christian. They just love asking me about touchy subjects to see my response. And this is because, unfortunately, there are so many christians who have this idea that the whole world needs to see things the same way they do. You see so much hate coming out of a religion that claims to preach peace and love. Christians see it as protecting the bible but it just comes across as ignorant. I am not saying I don’t share in the opinions of many christians, but more than anything I am saying that christians need to learn that not everyone in the world is going to see it the same way they will. When it comes to sin, same sex marriage, and living a holy life there are more than one opinion on what is right. So, you can’t justify all of the hate-acts in the name of your religion. Instead use all that energy you waste on hate to love and help those around you, despite whether you think they are “right or wrong”. I believe that that’s what God is more concerned about.
The grounds of judicial review help judges uphold constitutional principles by, ensuring discretionary power of public bodies correspond with inter alia the rule of law. I will discuss the grounds of illegality, irrationality and proportionality in relation to examining what case law reveals about the purpose and effect these grounds.
A jury makes the system more open, in that justice is seen to be done and that the process is public, making this a trial by peers and therefore satisfying the Right to Trial by Jury given by the Magna Carta. Jurors are ordinary members of the local community who are not legally trained, and as a Jury does not have to explain its decisions they are free to come to a verdict based on fairness alone. When deliberating a verdict they will sit alone and will be protected from outside influences. In Pontings’ Case (1984) a civil servant was charged under the Official Secrets Act 1889 after he leaked documents to an MP regarding the sinking of a ship – the General Belgrano. He pleaded not guilty because the documents showed that the Government of the day had lied and Ponting maintained that the leaking of
For many years it has been debated whether or not the death penalty should be served to inmates, like every argument there are two sides to it. People believe it should be completely be banned seeing it as a cruel punishment and morally unacceptable and there are the people who believe in “an eye for an eye” the two major parties in the United States Republican and Democratic parties have both shown an opposition for this punishment. If the two major parties oppose the issue why is it still being used in the country? That is the question many people are asking. For many people the death penalty is morally unacceptable and a very cruel form of punishment, these people sees life as something valuable. No matter what you believe in and what the person who is being executed did they believe it is wrong for them to receive this punishment that it would be better if the person received life in prison without the chance of parole, because what is life being locked up 24 hours a day anyways . A question commonly asked by the people against it is “what gives another human the right to decide...
Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is a governmental sanctioned practice where a person is executed by the state as punishment for murder. There are 31 states in the United States that continue to uphold the death penalty (Death). Although the death penalty has faced a great deal of opposition, it is enforced and is a moral punishment for heinous crime. The cost of maintaining death row inmates is expensive, but allows families and friends to have closure after their loved one has been murdered. Executions are carried out respectfully and humanely and help to prevent future crimes. The death penalty serves as a vital purpose and holds criminals accountable for their crimes against human beings.