More handpicked essays just for you.
Interest groups and their influence on public policies
Interest groups and their influence on public policies
Interest groups and their influence on public policies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
How would you feel if you were arrested for going into Walmart because you are a Christian? This discriminatory practice is referred to as racial profiling- when a person is singled out by law enforcement officials because of their ethnicity, religion, or national origin. Iron triangles is a word they use to sum up the groups that go about making policies. Interest groups gain knowledge on the ideas they choose to present to Congress. These issues, such as racial profiling, can be resolved by something called an iron triangle. In 2011, on the 10th anniversary of the September 11th terrorist attacks, a half-Jewish and half-Arab woman was yanked off her flight, in handcuffs. She was then strip-searched and put in jail for more than 4 hours. Due to Hebshi’s and the two Indian-American men sitting next to hers’ ethnicity, they were targeted and then were ordered off the plane. Not one of …show more content…
Their power can go a long way in policy making or changing. To change a policy that an interest group feels as bad, they begin pending with information to present to the Congress on how to change the policy and why, and they also advocate for larger budgets to the agencies. The agencies, therefore, provides the interest groups with contracts and services for the members of congress. The committees, or Congress, support the interest groups ideas and accept a budget from the agencies requests. And that is how an iron triangle coincides with the policy making or changing process. Effective iron triangles can resolve issues by changing or making policies. Racial profiling is one of those issues that needs to be resolved. I believe that racial profiling can be made illegal with a good interest group that can advocate for the issue. The power that an interest group has can go a long way in the policy making world and with congress. Once they all agree, it is an easy
3). The law claims to be fair, impartial and concerned with neutrality and equality. (Hulbert, 2010). It is concerned with justice, but in reality seems to be discriminatory. Justice is a lot more than solving a situation that seems problematic but is also constituted by considerations of substantive justice. (Hulbert, 2010). The law, in theory, is objective and without bias but in practice can be opaque and discriminatory. Abdirahman Abdi 37-year old man is one of many to experience the cruel reality of the law and its practices. On Sunday, July 24th at 9:30 am the police received multiple calls about a disturbance at a coffee shop in Ottawa. The police arrived, pursued Abdirahman Abdi and arrested him 250 meters from his apartment building. Witnesses say that Abdirahman was beaten with a baton and pepper sprayed. A very graphic video showed Abdirahman on the ground handcuffed with blood surrounding him while the officer held him to the ground with a knee. One of the eyewitnesses Zainab Abdallah tried to intervene, she pleaded with the officers telling them that Abdi has a mental illness, but that did not deter them. Abdirahman was dead 45 minutes before receiving medical attention. What has been questioned by black lives matter
Chavez clarifies that it is unpleasant to be a victim of racial profiling especially if you know it happens because of your nationality or the color of your skin. Furthermore, Chavez goes on to explain how an Arab Americans get taken off aircrafts after being allowed to fly, the fact that they get pulled off planes because airline security suspected that they were perilous to passengers. Just because they are Arabs is what is erroneous and very prejudiced. Chavez also debates the tragic incident of September 11th where nineteen Arab terrorist killed more than three thousand Americans. According to Linda Chavez, “this kind of racial profiling is both morally wrong and ineffective.” On the other hand she says, “But there are times when it makes sense to include race or national origin in a larger criminal profile, practically if you’re dealing with a crime that has already been committed or is ongoing and the participants all come from single ethnic group.” (Chavez 576). Chavez argues that the best way to keep America safe is by taking the necessary
First of all, racial profiling is unfair to its victims . Racial profiling is seen through the police in “Hounding the Innocent”, which is unfair since a person shouldn’t be pulled over more because of their race and that many of these stops have little to no connection to an actual crime. “Young black and Hispanic males are being stopped, frisked, and harassed in breathtaking numbers” (Herbert, 29) This is unfair to all victims of racial
Therefore, we can sometimes see something similar to checks and balances within the iron triangle. There are probably members from every group of iron triangles that are against racial profiling, but if this is the case why does racial profiling continue to happen? Racial profiling is in fact unconstitutional, but no end is in sight of this unnecessary punishment for the minorities. The intent of racial profiling is often to keep people from being harmed. For example, Hebshi was sitting on a plane next to two other men of Indian descent on the tenth anniversary of 9/11.
Many governments in the world, like the US have subgovernments, systems that help make the voices' of small groups interested in specific things heard. Without many subgovernments small interest groups would not even be recongnized. The iron triangle is one of those subgovernments; congressional committees work with interest groups and a bureaucratic agency to have demands met. Thanks to the iron triangle may small interest groups have a voice in their country governments' legislature.
Terrorism and racial profiling is nothing new in our society. Although some people would like to believe that it is nonexistent, it is still a major issue in today’s world. With that being said, my view on the subject is that racial profiling is going to continue to happen whether we like it or not. I believe profiling isn 't necessarily meant to intentionally harm anyone, but is used as a tool to prevent terrorism. Past terroristic attacks have lead to the many stereotypes and prejudice that our country has today.
Racial profiling in America, as evidenced by recent events, has reached a critical breaking point. No longer can an African American, male or female, walk into a store, school, or any public place without fear of being stereotyped as a person of suspicion. Society constantly portrays the African American
These pluralistic interest groups are free to operate and lobby in the political arena, fighting against the majority and other competing factions for voice in Congress. With the influence of multiple factions operating throughout the political system, a balance of power is created (Kernell 2000, 429). This is much like the international theory of sovereign states balancing each other’s power to create a political system that focuses on stability, yet is always in a constant flux of power. With this in mind, special interest groups are constantly contending for power by raising money, campaigning, and lobbying in Congress. When a special interest group is threatened by a competing policy, the group will organize efforts to balance, or transcend the power of the competing group.
Before any argument can be made against racial profiling, it is important to understand what racial profiling is. The American Civil Liberties Union, defines racial profiling as "the discriminatory practice by law enforcement officials of targeting individuals for suspicion of crime based on the individual's race, ethnicity, religion or national origin"(Racial Profiling: Definition). Using this definition we can determine that racial profiling excludes any evidence of wrong-doing and relies solely on the characteristics listed above. We can also see that racial profiling is different from criminal profiling, which uses evidence of wrong-doing and facts which can include information obtained from outside sources and evidence gathered from investigation. Based on these definitions, I will show that racial profiling is unfair and ineffective because it relies on stereotyping, encourages discrimination, and in many cases can be circumvented.
There has always been racial profiling in our history. The problem here is that at some point the ones who are oppressed and discriminated sooner o later will claim why they are treated unequally. There are many examples around the world, but one only has to take a look at how the American society has been designed to realize the great difference between individuals. It was even normal and acceptable to see these differences during the creation of this nation because the ones who supposedly had the power and knowledge of conquering made sure to create a huge division between leaders and subordinates.
In the iron triangle model there are three roles interacting with one another in relation to one or more specific types of policy. The three roles are congressional committees, bureaucratic agencies, and interest groups. The primary role of a congressional committee is to control the federal budget and legislation. The primary role of a bureaucratic agency is to carry out or act on legislation and use funds allocated through the budget to do so. The primary role of an interest group is to influence the congressional committee in order to obtain some benefit that is then carried out by the bureaucratic agency. These roles are mutually bene...
Hessian Abbess’s resentment is shared by many Arab and Arab-American fliers who say racial and ethnic bias is playing a bigger part in who gets pulled aside for questioning and a thorough baggage check by airport security. Complaints like Hassan Abbass's have soared since the September 11 incident prompted stricter airport security nationwide.
They put the law into action and make sure the citizens of the United States abide by it. They do whatever they seem fit just as President Kennedy saw the discrimination in the workplace getting out of hand and put out the executive order 10925 that made sure there was no discrimination in the workplace. The iron triangle which consists of interest groups, congress, and the bureaucracy all push the government to pass laws that they stand up for and believe is right and constitutional. The interest groups are very passionate like Martin Luther King Jr. was with the end of segregation. He and many egged on congress to pass the Civil Rights Act and implement it into
Have the American people lost their spunk? Should Americans fear the power of the Iron Triangle and racial profiling? What racial profiling occurs in law enforcement? Why dose racial profiling occur? Problems with majority rule.
Airlines are currently in litigation with Arabs and people on Indian descent over racial profiling. Recently, five passengers who of that descent who had passed through intense security check points and who were still denied the right to fly have filed individ...