Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Populist movements in history
Populism in the late 19th century and early 20th century
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Populist movements in history
1st Argument:
Moving on to our first argument we can clearly see that that populism is an echo of the voice of the people. Once this it understood it becomes clear why you cannot regret the rise of global populism, and that is because it is created by the people’s will and is defined and applied differently in different regions and countries. There is no cookie-cutter form of populism because it cuts not just across geographical borders and historical eras, but also ideological cleavages, according to, Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, an associate professor at the School of Political Science of the Diego Portales University in Chile. It becomes clear that in populism, the principle of nationalism is used as a tool to bring their communities
…show more content…
This can be seen specifically in countries such as China. Furthermore, given the ever increasing amount of threats posed on governments today, populist nationalism allows for communities to feel safe. Unfortunately, outside forces that pose threats to all communities can be found no matter their location. Whether it be ISIS, the CIRA, or Boko Haram, there are individuals whose sole goal is to cause mass hysteria and destroy society as we know it. Populist Nationalism however provides an anchor for our society. In a report by Andrew Thompson and Ralph Fevre titled, “The national question: sociological reflections on nation and nationalism”,they found that overall populism is an anchor for society helps individuals who otherwise would have been cast out to sea. It solidifies their bond with their government, protecting them from external sources all the while allowing the economy to …show more content…
As the majority of people are not benefiting from supposed economic growth. This has bred a culture of anti-establishment policies, which populism on a psychological level shows the will of the people. According to, a report by the University of Amsterdam, titled, Political psychology research: ideology and cynicism are rooted in personality . They found that the, 2015 European Consortium for Political Research model of political preference holds that voters seek politicians and parties similar to their own personality and that successful politicians ‘speak the language of personality … by identifying and conveying those individual characteristics that are most appealing … to a particular constituency.. So we need to dispel the myth and the notion that it is irrational and wrong to be a populist, because it is necessary to understand that it is not irrational to express yourself politically to show your discontent to policies and agendas that you disagree
Nationalism has been a potent force for change since the development of human civilization. However, opinion about the extent to which nationalism may be appropriately pursued is highly diverse, a factor that has led to immense tragedy and suffering in countless regions worldwide. While it is both appropriate and sometimes encouraged to take pride in being part of a nation, it is of the utmost importance that it is done without harming or subjugating people of another. Uniting a people by force and potentially eliminating or destroying those who may oppose it or not belong to it is unacceptable ethically, morally, and socially.
When populism was first used in the United States in the late 1800s, it was geared towards the farmers. The focus on farmers showed the interest the Populists had toward working class people, who made up the majority of the nation. Even though there were more working class people than wealthy, it was the wealthy business owners who ruled society. They ran political machines and monopolies and did not provide the best working and living conditions for their employees. William Jennings Bryan said, “There are two ideas of government...those who believe that if you just legislate to make the well-to-do prosperous that their prosperity will leak through on those below. The Democratic idea...if you legislate to make the masses prosperous their prosperity
In all the history of America one thing has been made clear, historians can’t agree on much. It is valid seeing as none of them can travel back in time to actually experience the important events and even distinguish what has value and what doesn’t. Therefore all historians must make a leap and interpret the facts as best they can. The populist movement does not escape this paradox. Two views are widely accepted yet vastly different, the views of Richard Hofstadter and Lawrence Goodwyn. They disagree on whether populists were “isolated and paranoid bigots” or “sophisticated, empathetic egalitarians”; whether their leaders were “opportunists who victimized them” or “visionary economic theorists who liberated them”; whether their beliefs were rooted in the free silver campaign of the 1890s or the cooperative movement of the 1880s; and finally whether their ideal society was in the “agrarian past” or “the promise of a cooperative future”. They could not agree on anything, over all Richard Hofstadter seems to have a better idea of the truth of populism.
The farmers feared that Eastern industrialists and bankers were gaining too much influence, power and control over the government. During the “bust” cycle, and times of difficulties, farmers got together, talked about their problems and formed the Populist Party. The Populists were formed because of challenges and difficulties in which they were forced to deal with every day. These challenges included crop failures, falling prices, and the inability to pay loans. The Populists party called for reform by wanting the government to intervene and lessen the impact of economic depressions, regu...
Nationalism is a political, economic and social ideology, doctrine and practice describing the “advocacy of or support for the interests of one’s own nation”, especially above the interests of other outside nations, individuals, and regions (“Nationalism”). It is a conscious state of mind where individuals believe their duty and loyalty is to the nation-state. It believes that a nation is the most crucial aspect for human social life because it gives a nation a sense of unity by promoting the shared interests and identities of the individuals such as language, race, religion etc. (“Nationalism”). Therefore, the aim of nationalism is to preserve and promote the nation’s culture as opposed to other cultures. Politically, the goal is gaining and
Throughout the years, humans have constructed many unique civilizations; all which follow a distinct social, economic, and political structure. Even so, there is one characteristic that prevails among these societies, the concept of nationalism. In short, nationalism refers to the feelings people have when identifying with their nation. This simple notion possesses the ability to divide or unite collective groups, and has played an important role in many historical events.
Populism- The belief in the regular people’s power and that they had the right to control their government rather than a small group of the elite. In Russian it was formed by students who wanted a social revolution based on the communal life of the Russian Peasants.
Nationalism is way of thinking both political and socially to create a community united by: history, ethnicity, religions, common culture, and language. Numerous effects occurred while establishing a Nationalist community, some effects were a long term impact on Nationalism, and other was short term impacts on Nationalism.
Throughout history, there has been countless times where a country is ran by tyranny, and countless times where tyranny negatively affects the country. Our country, the United States of America, was one of those countries at one point, but we thankfully got out of it from war. Since our country didn’t want to go back to tyranny, people had to create a system, and a set of principles that would prevent that from happening. So, the Constitution was made. Tyranny is a government ran by one person, or a small amount of people, and the United States got out of it, but we still had to establish a way to prevent it from happening again. The constitution did it’s job and protected against tyranny by the small states vs. large states, federalism, separation of power, and checks and balances.
The most important value of nationalism to democracy lies in the fact that it has the capacity to unite individual citizens into a single entity with shared beliefs. Democracy requires a definition of demos or who are included in the game and who are not (Nodia 6). Wherever the boundaries of the playing field are in dispute, democratic institutions (such as participation, representation, or cooperation) simply cannot function. Thus, for democracy to o...
Populism is a political ideology centered on the perspective that there is a separation and inherent struggle between the populace [‘the pure people’] and a ruling faction [‘the corrupt elite’] (Mudde 2015: 2). Moreover, populism constructs a particular view on society and how it should be structured—and populist leaders and movement focus only a limited part of the larger political agenda, a demand that many people can identify with, like lower taxes or less immigration (Muller 2014: 3). Populism is pro-democracy, supporting popular sovereignty and majority rule and argues that politics should be an expression of the general will of the people. But, it is anti-liberal democracy, rejecting pluralism and minority rights (Mudde 2015:2) Historically
For me, the most striking thought from this article is to find that the common thread of the Chinese youth and this new form of nationalism is not an intention to overthrow or reform their government, but to unite the people in pride and purpose. Writer Osnos explained that contrary to predictions, nationalism in China has flourished. “Nineteen years after the crackdown on student-led protests in Tiananmen Square, China’s young elite rose again – not in pursuit of liberal democracy but in defense of sovereignty and prosperity.”
However, simultaneous with this homogenization, many are reasserting (or constructing) differences between themselves and global hegemony. Obvious indicators of this fragmentation are the rise of nationalism evident today in elections across the world, where electorates are choosing to define and preserve the qualities they perceive as unique to their national identity in the face of intensified movement of people, religion and ideology across the
Globalization’s history is extremely diversified and began during the beginning of civilization. Now we live in a world that is constantly evolving, demanding people to use resources in locations that are very difficult to obtain certain resources. This could make it completely impossible to operate in these specific parts of the world. However, globalization allows people across the world to acquire much needed resources. Globalization creates the opportunity for businesses to take advantage and exploit the ability to take part of their business to a different country. Nevertheless, globalization is part of today’s society and will be involved in virtually all situations.
If the government is illegitimate, then ideally nationalism steps in to demand a completely self-determined government, which renders proper representation to its populace. Despite the diversity of a state's population, theoretically, harmony is maintained since the people are properly represented or controlled. This situation with variation is experienced throughout the world. States are dynamic, also their government and populace. If the dynamics of the government or the state do not keep up with the pace of change in the populace, then instability will rise in the name of nationalism and shake the very foundation of the state if left unchecked or not placated. The method used by the author of the book was personal interviews with both prominent people and the normal everyday person in the areas visited. He also uses descriptions on the surrounding areas to accent the point of discussion. His intent was to objectively take the reader on a stroll through the areas he visited. Through his style of writing, he allows the reader to sit in on his interview by highlighting specific questions and the responses that take place in his conversations. Finally, he creates visual images that he had viewed as ironic and analogical in support of his observations. Ignatieff comes to the conclusion that nationalism is not the problem of this world. Continuing, he goes on to say that when one loses their individuality to become a "patriot," that is where the danger lies. Being yourself is something that ethnic nationalism does not allow.