Argumentative Essay On Doctor Vs Patient

In the world of medicine, there are paths that fork in numerous sections of the decisions that must be made. It is unclear as to who is right in taking the control of doctor versus patient. The individual seeking treatment has their own rights that must be respected, morals that they have for themselves, and are the only ones who can really know what is best for them. However, there are times when the doctor may seem to have a natural authority over these. The doctor can be the only one who may be judgmentally sound in what is right for the patient, they may also have their own morals that can drive their decisions, and could even be acting on behalf of the patient. Who would be right, it is almost impossible to say without having a circumstance

Referring again to the situation that was discussed in the video, it was suggested that the patient could possibly be psychologically unable to face the fact that they have cancer. There aren’t any release of rights, but the doctor could see the fact that they are having trouble comprehending their condition. It could be viewed as the right thing to do if they recognize this circumstance. They would be acting on the patient’s wish to help them by making a choice for their better health, with the proof that the individual cannot decide for themselves. Looking back towards the case of the patient not wanting to look for further care, it is presented that the cancer has now progressed. An argument to define reasoning as to why a doctor should now act, is for their morals like that of the patient. It can conflict within the same areas as the individuals as well. From a utilitarian point, if she is saved she can benefit the life of her husband and simply try for a baby on another day. Also, with a point like that of socrates, the doctor can’t simply stand by while watching another person willingly commit what is essentially considered suicide. This is affecting them within themselves as well as what can be logically arrived at through sequence of other facts. Lastly, the segment where in which the patient has now become unconscious, the doctor has now become

The patient could have their own right to make choices, however the individual could be unable to make their own decision. Also, the doctor may have morals they adhere to much like the patient. Lastly, no one can know what is truly within the interest of themselves other than themselves. However, when it is necessary a doctor may be able to act on another’s behalf should there be a common pattern that defines the individual’s desires. The only view that can be taken of this should be that of a general understanding. The patient must be able to understand the choice they are making, consequences and other results that can follow. Even more so, the doctor has to respect that this is someone’s choice. If there is a conflict in whether or not the patient is of sound mind and judgement, then the choice should be converted to another “neutral” question for the individual. If they answer/choose the same path again, it would be a better chance that they are acting with full understanding. If the patient were to come into a situation that they could not proclaim their best interest, it is best to reserve to possible paperwork in which they have previously arranged what should be carried out. Should there not be anything of this sort, then it cannot be left to a single person. For maximum chance of correctly