Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical issue with capital punishment
Death penalty moral dilemma
Ethical issue with capital punishment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
After researching this issue and looking at it from the both sides, I believe we must be careful in looking at people based on their current situation as opposed to their health condition. Of course, we can also say, being on death row equates to a health condition in regards to your estimated life span. If you are sentenced to death and are currently on death row, you would not be eligible to receive an organ transplant. On the other hand, short of death row, you would be eligible. If you were a prisoner, and were on the donor list, either to receive or donate, it would be no different than anyone else.
As illustrated by Utah Law (2013), “Utah’s governor, Gary R. Herbert, signed the first state law on March 28 that explicitly permits general
…show more content…
prisoners to sign up for organ donation -- and cracks the door to the controversial option of allowing death-row inmates to donate as well.” As I had alluded to, I believe even death row inmates have the right to donate their organs. This may be their only way to payback society for their wrong doing. This may also be their only opportunity to donate their organs to a family member or loved one. If that’s the case, why would we take that option away from them? Some argue that due to the prisoners being incarcerated, this decision is not voluntary, I agree with Satel (2014), “If healthy inmates are sincerely motivated to donate, fully educated about the risks and receive no special treatment in return, how are they not acting voluntarily?
“
The other argument comes in the form of cost. Some of these procedures can cost millions of dollars. Due to this, many believe we already spend too much money on housing and providing for prisoners. According to Prison Legal News (2014), “It is a sort of lose-lose situation for the taxpayer,” said state Senator Dawson Hodgson. “It can amount to torture if you let someone die without healthcare. At the same time, $1 million is a tremendous amount of taxpayer resources, whether it is coming from the state or federal government, put into any person’s healthcare – never mind someone who is a drug dealer and a thief.”
It is my hope that our charter as a country doesn’t cross into an area of immoral treatment. Many prisoners incarcerated today made a bad decision, their incarceration is the punishment. That is where it should stop. For us to use this to justifying taking away their rights to adequate healthcare is improper and verges on cruel and unusual punishment. In short, if they would have had this opportunity outside of incarceration, then they should have this same opportunity while
incarcerated. As earlier mentioned, I believe we would all be happy to receive an organ from a prisoner if it would save our life or save one of our loved ones lives. That being the case, why wouldn’t they be able to receive the same? After all, they may be someone’s loved one too.
Some inmates have incurable conditions. Troy Reid who had high blood pressure and kidney problems was one (Mendelssohn. p. 295). July of 2007 Reid began to get treated for his kidneys that were shutting down (Mendelssohn. p. 295). Three times a week he would get a kidney dialysis but on April of 2008 he died (Mendelssohn. p. 295). He grown tired of the treatments and decided to die (Mendelssohn. p. 295). From July 2007 to April 2008 taxpayers paid for Reid’s treatments. For some people the treatments that Reid had no point and was just a waste. If inmates that have incurable diseases like Reid’s should not be in prison or jail. They should be released and they them self should pay for the treatment they seek. A lot of money was wasted on Reid; this is a reason they should not pay for inmate health care.
Main Point 1: Imagine someone that has been accused of murder and sentenced to death row has to spend almost 17-20 years in jail and then one day get kill. Then later on the person that they killed was not the right person.
Imagine the money amassed over a life sentence of paying for medicine. The American public pays for all of these expenses added to the actual building of the prison facility, which is extremely expensive.... ... middle of paper ... ...
For centuries, the death penalty has been used by nations throughout the world. Practices such as stoning, the guillotine, firing squads, electrocution, and lethal injections have all been common practices to condemn criminals who had enacted heinous crimes. In concurrent society, however, capital punishment has begun to be viewed as a barbaric and inhumane. From these judgments, arguments and controversies have erupted over whether or not the United States should continue to practice the death penalty. With advocates and critics arguing over the morality of the death penalty, the reason to why the death penalty exists has been blurred. Because of the death penalty’s ability to thwart future criminals through fear and its practical purposes, the practice of capital punishment should continue in the United States.
The United States guarantees the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; however, if the death penalty is legal, the same country which promises life, has the ability to take it away. If a person were to commit first degree murder, take part in terrorism, or commit an act of espionage, they would be faced with capital punishment. Many Americans disagree with the death penalty because of the high expense of death, the possibility of innocent people murdered, and the amount of crime deterred by the elimination of the death penalty. However, many citizens realize the advantages to the death penalty such as, prison escapees who might commit more crimes, a potential solution to overcrowded prisons, and a way for victims’ families
Throughout the years the death penalty has been a very controversial aspect when it comes to punishment. Some groups of people believe that is should be abolished and other think that America should keep it. I’m here to say that I am not for the death penalty at all. To me the death penalty has a couple of flaws that I have an issue looking past. The death penalty is very unconstitutional for anyone who is put through it and it is very bias on who it chooses for the punishment.
“The motto of the DOC is care, custody, and control, and the DOC tends to slide toward custody and control. Care is often viewed with some suspicion” (Penrod). Inmates in a state prison become wards of the state, and while they don’t have access to privately funded healthcare, they do have a constitutional right to tax-payer funded healthcare. For aging prisoners this cost is very high. The 2012 Report by the ACLU states “Because of healthcare and physical needs that prisons are ill-equipped to handle, each aging prisoner on average costs taxpayers $68,270 per year—approximately double what it costs to incarcerate an average prisoner” (2012). Because the elderly prison population is increasing, the demand for prison healthcare is increasing, leading to more costs and, eventually, higher
The death penalty will never be an easy task to take on, whether watching it, or being apart if the process. How did it come about and who made the first decision that a person had to die because of their actions. I all why are some states: including Florida still "putting people to death". Some questions are easier to answer then others, and even though the death penalty seems like the best form of punishment, I 'm not sure if will ever agree whether it 's the right or not?
The death sentence has become a huge controversy in the United States over the past forty years. Over those forty years there has been a lot of less tax payers and donators willing to pay money to the justice system to execute a criminal. These types of people that have helped to pay in the past for these executions have stopped due to them not wanting a death connected to them in any way, or because they simply see life in prison a more suitable punishment. Without the funding needed, the criminals on death row are not able to receive their proper punishment within a reasonable amount of time. A lot of times the criminals never get their proper punishment due to lack of funding. Also, criminals that commit extreme crimes may not get the death penalty due to it not being registered as capital murder. These are all issues that have affected the death penalty over time.
In the United States 2,193,798 people are held in Federal prisons, local prisons and local/county jails. In local prisons 64.2 % of the inmates have a mental illness, 56.2 % in Federal prisons and 44.8 % in state prisons. Most of the inmates could have prevented their stay at the prisons if they were provided help for their illness, however they were not and they still have to serve their sentenced time. The inmates locked up are abused daily by other inmates or even the officers in charge. They cannot help they have illness and it is not fair that they have to suffer a punishment worse than they already have to. They are tormented and the abuse does not help their situation, the agitation can even make their condition worse, and the treatment for their illness is low quality if there is any at all. They are given harsh punishments or can even have their sentence made longer.
Medical treatment given to inmates is ethical to some people. Some people think that it is not ethical to give treatments and basic check ups to an inmate because of what that person did wrong. They say that those criminals do not deserve treatments or check ups. On the flip side, other people think it is ethical to give treatment to inmates because it a law that they must follow. It is stated in the inmate's book of rights that they are to be given some certain medical treatments. The government does say it is ethical to give the inmates health care
Capital punishment has been a controversial topic in association to any person condemned to a serious committed crime. Capital punishment has been a historical punishment for any cruel crime. Issues associated to things such as the different methods used for execution in most states, waste of taxpayers’ money by performing execution, and how it does not serve as any form of justice have been a big argument that raise many eyebrows. Capital punishment is still an active form of deterrence in the United States. The history of the death penalty explains the different statistics about capital punishment and provides credible information as to why the form of punishment should be abolished by every state. It is believed
The death penalty is a controversial subject, just as is abortion is a difficult topic as well to discuss. People are most likely not going to change their opinion based on others opinions. The issue with the death penalty is that innocent lives are sometimes taken due to being granted guilty when innocent. As stated by the newsletter The Guardian, “At least 4.1% of all defendants sentenced to death in the US in the modern era are innocent, according to the first major study to attempt to calculate how often states get it wrong in their wielding of the ultimate punishment.” The death penalty is geared towards those that have committed a crime, so why should the state be so quickly to accuse an innocent person as guilty due to evidence that fits the defendant’s description enough to go ahead and make him guilty. Some say that race plays a role in the death penalty process, “In 1990 a report from the General Accounting Office concluded that "in 82 percent of the studies [reviewed], race of the victim was found to influence the likelihood of being charged with capital murder or receiving the death penalty, i.e. those who murdered whites were more likely to be sentenced to death than those who murdered blacks (Death Penalty Focus).”
I was a firm believer in the death penalty when I was younger. Not fully understanding the severity and backlash that comes with it. I actually believed that lethal injection was a privileged way of dying for some crimes. I even supported the harsher punishments such as stoning or execution by firing squad. I use to think an eye for an eye. I felt that way from the pain of losing someone. As I grew older and became more open minded and seeing the world around me I oppose the death penalty. I feel the way I do for what may be common reasons, but also for reasons that might be less common. We are taught to think do people deserve to die for the crimes they’ve committed, but the real question is do we deserve to kill?
Capital punishment has been legal in the United Sates since the 18th Century. A few crimes that have the death penalty as its consequence are drug trafficking, espionage, treason, attempting to kill a juror or witness, and federal murder. Capital punishment is very controversial since different people have different opinions. The big debate that’s been discussed is whether or not the death penalty is right or wrong. Other countries seem to be more accustomed to the death penalty, rather than the United States, so our country will look at the death penalty as a harsher reality than other countries would. A lot of people are in favor of the death penalty, and a lot of people are not. One reason people could be in favor of the death penalty is