Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Death penalty is effective or not
Controversy regarding death penalty
Death penalty is effective or not
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Death penalty is effective or not
A Controversial Topic
Capital Punishment has been a controversial issue in our society for centuries. Many people are against it for the case of supposedly moral grounds and others argue that it is the most just method of punishment in serious criminal cases. For its surrounding controversy, it has been abolished in many countries but remains to stand in some, especially those with a prominent religious influence Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Capital punishment should be the preferred method of penalizing murderers compared to a lifetime jail sentence, as it protects society, is the most just way of punishment and warns potential murderers.
Protecting Society
Capital punishment should be enforced in helping to protect our society, as the murderer has no chance of repeating an offence through a prison break to regain their freedom as well as killing cellmates and prison workers.
When a murderer receives a jail sentence there is always a possibility that he/she could escape and continue to kill more people, causing more trouble and distress to our already deteriorating society. There have been many cases regarding prison escapes from convicted murderers. A French criminal, Pascal Payet failed to hijack a protected truck in 1997 and killed the driver by firing at him 14 times. He was then sentenced to a 30-year jail sentence in a French prison, but managed to escape twice with the aid of his accomplices by skyjacking a helicopter. However, Payet was still identified in Spain and recaptured by Spanish police albeit undergoing cosmetic surgery to alter his appearance. (Escape Artist’s First Prison Breakout, n.d.). Payet is one of many prison escapees who take advantage of the corrupt jail syst...
... middle of paper ...
...f. Robert Blecker on the Death Penalty [Video file]. Retrieved from http://nyls.mediasite.com
Phillips, D. P. (1980). The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: New Evidence on an Old.
Controversy. American Journal of Sociology, 86(1), 143.
Pojman, L. P., Reiman, J. H. (1998). The Death Penalty: For and Against. Lanham,
MD: Rowman and Littlefield
Rowe, W.F. (1996, February 1). Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science: Case Studies in the Use of DNA Evidence to Establish Innocence After Trial. National Institute of Justice, 10, 15. Retrieved from, https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/dnaevid.pdf
Slopping out case: life of luxury in British jails. (2011, September 26). The Telegraph.
Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/
Van Den Haag, E. (1969). On Deterrence and the Death Penalty. The Journal of Criminal
Law, Criminology and Police Science, 60, 146-147.
Andre, Claire, and Manuel Velasquez. “Capital Punishment.” Our Duty or Our Doom. 12 May 2010. 30 May 2010 .
Shin, Kilman, Death Penalty and Crime: Empirical Studies; Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Center for Economic Analysis, 1978
The capital punishment has been cited as a reasonable sentence by those who advocate for retribution. This is essentially when it comes to justice so that people take full responsibility for their individual actions. Studies have proved that the decision to take away life of a person because they committed a certain crime serves to perpetuate the crime in question. It also serves to enhance the progress of organized and violent crime. It has been noted that various flaws in the justice system has led to the wrong conviction of innocent people. On the other hand, the guilty have also been set free, and a plethora of several cases has come up when a critical look at the capital punishment has been undertaken. Killers hardly kill their victims deliberately, but they probably act on anger, passion, or impulsively. In this regard, it is not proper to convict them exclusively without
Capital punishment is a treatment which continues being used in today’s society. After looking over the statements about capital punishment, a person is left to make an informative decision. Whether capital punishment continues in our nation or not is up to the citizens. Since we see capital punishment happening today, in newspapers, on TV, and on the Internet, we are surrounded by resources influencing our choices. People must not get caught up in public ads displaying capital punishment. Individuals are left to make a decision for themselves, whether capital punishment is the correct consequence or not.
The death penalty should be legal. If it were there would be millions of murderers that wouldn’t be in the world anymore and everybody would be scared to kill again. Prisons are being over populated because we are letting Murderers live when they should be executed. Murderers should be killed all they do is cause problems. If they aren’t going to contribute to society in any way and they just kill people they aren’t useful.
This same article examines the history of DNA evidence and acknowledges that when evidence was first introduced to the courts that the new type of identification was initially accepted without any challenges, however, critics quickly contended that DNA tests were problematic because of the reliability and the validity of probative value of the evidence. For example, DNA exoneration cases suggest that errors in forensic identification led to a high number of wrongful convictions and concerns that media coverage portrayals of forensic science evidence on popular television shows leads jurors to unfairly weigh DNA evidence while making their decision about the facts of a trial (Carrell, 2008). Moreover, in recent DNA exoneration cases the courts and jurors had difficulty analyzing the testimony of the experts on forensic identification evidence. According to the article, in 86 DNA exoneration cases, forensic science testing errors were the second leading cause of wrongful conviction, falling behind wrongful eyewitness misidentification (Carrell,
Eagan, Jeffrey A. “Capital Punishment: Deterrent Effects and Capital Costs.” Law.columbia.edu. Columbia Law School, 2013. Web. 12 Feb. 2013.
The world has been a scarier place to live with the increasing crime rates. Tough punishments and financial bail are being implemented to reduce the criminal acts. Capital punishment, or the death penalty is the harshest available government punishment for the big crimes like murder, terrorism, and others. Historically, Capital Punishment has been used in almost every parts of the world. Currently, the large majority of countries have either abolished or discontinued the practice. Several countries like Iraq, Pakistan, North Korea, China, and the USA retain the death penalty in both law and practice. It is legal in thirty-one states and illegal in nineteen states in the United States of America. Capital punishment has always been a debatable
During the 1970s, the top argument in favor of the death penalty was general deterrence. This argument suggests that we must punish offenders to discourage others from committing similar offenses; we punish past offenders to send a message to potential offenders. In a broad sense, the deterrent effect of punishment is thought to b...
Have you ever thought about if the person next to you is a killer or a rapist? If he is, what would you want from the government if he had killed someone you know? He should receive the death penalty! Murderers and rapists should be punished for the crimes they have committed and should pay the price for their wrongdoing. Having the death penalty in our society is humane; it helps the overcrowding problem and gives relief to the families of the victims, who had to go through an event such as murder.
To abolish capital punishment on this basis would be way off base. You would also have to get rid of prisons because they do not keep people from committing crimes. Texas A&M University collected data and the results are horrifying. In 1960 there were 56 executions and 9,140 murders in the past. In 1964 there were 15 executions and 9, 250 murders.
While we may all want murders off the street, the problem we come to face is that capital punishment is being used for vengeance or as a deterrent. Capital punishment has been used worldwide, not only by the governments to instill fear, but to show that there are repercussions to ones actions. From the time we are born, we are taught to learn the difference between right and wrong. It is ingrained in our brains, what happens to people that do bad things? Capital punishment is renowned for being the worst thing that could be brought amongst ones life.
Special attention will be given to the topics of deterrence, the families of the victims, and the increased population that has been occurring within our prisons. Any possible objections will also be assessed, including criticism regarding the monetary value of the use of the death penalty and opposition to this practice due to its characteristics, which some identify as hypocritical and inhumane. My goal in arguing for the moral justifiability of capital punishment is not to use this practice extensively, but rather to reduce the use to a minimum and use it only when necessary. Above all else, capital punishment should be morally justified in extreme situations because it has a deterrent effect. Many criminals seem to be threatened more by the thought of death rather than a long-term prison sentence.
Capital punishment has been a controversial topic in association to any person condemned to a serious committed crime. Capital punishment has been a historical punishment for any cruel crime. Issues associated to things such as the different methods used for execution in most states, waste of taxpayers’ money by performing execution, and how it does not serve as any form of justice have been a big argument that raise many eyebrows. Capital punishment is still an active form of deterrence in the United States. The history of the death penalty explains the different statistics about capital punishment and provides credible information as to why the form of punishment should be abolished by every state. It is believed
Schonebaum, Stephen E. "A Swifter Death Penalty Would Be An Effective Deterrent." Does Capital Punishment Deter Crime? San Diego: David L. Bender; Greenhaven Press Inc. 1998. 18.