Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Animal testing should not be banned
Animal testing should not be banned
Animal testing is it morally right
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Animal testing should not be banned
Animal testing is not only a morally offensive behavior but also the darkest side of human nature.The animal suffers, feels pain or becomes happy or sad as per the situations, but people have been subjecting animals for medical, cosmetics, new drug or chemical testing purpose without considering the suffering that they may be experiencing. According to the article, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, “Each year, more than 100 million animals—including mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish, and birds—are killed in U.S. laboratories for chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics test.” The worst news is that the majorities of these experiments do not contribute to improving human living standards. However the numbers of experimenters who believe there is no curing for possible without doing an experiment in animals. I agree with Ty Johnson in his position paper Animal Testing is Inaccurate, Unbeneficial that Animal testing should be banned for human health and behavioral reasons.
It is important to know how animal testing is performed, before analyzing its effects in the physical and mental health of human beings. The conditions of animals in a lab are worse than most people could imagine. When they are in a lab, some are forced to inhale toxic
…show more content…
Arsenic is a chemical that almost always causes cancer in humans but when it is tested on animal, it has shown rarely- if ever- cause cancer to develop in animals (Johnson). A healthy person would be a victim of cancer if arsenic would be just tested in animal and apply in a human being. It’s clear that animal testing does not contribute for human purpose. Today, many people are sick or disable not because of their own physical health, but because of the new drug, that tested in animals and assumed it works same in human
One must remember that scientists who carry out animal testing are human to and most definitely do feel some sense of guilt using these animals for the sole reason to benefit mankind. However, “if there were good alternatives to animals that worked better or as well, for less money and hassle, scientists would use them” (Source D). Many believe that animals testing is wrong, but they must understand that at the current time there is no other option. It is difficult to find a different practice has been so substantial and has improved millions of lives and society as a whole. Animal testing, though the testing on animals may not be the best option, the after effects of testing has been successful over the past decades and will continue on this path as scientists and researchers gain more knowledge. There may be a point in time that society becomes so better off that there would be no more need to test
and Europe, which include reduction of animal use, refine animal study techniques, and animal testing replacement. According to Dana ,Bidnall, “Animals are also used, and subsequently killed, every year in many other types of laboratory experiments, from military testing to simulated car crashes to deliberately introduced diseases such as AIDS and Alzheimer 's”(49). Bidnal also states that, “These experiments take place in labs at universities, pharmaceutical companies, and testing agencies, and on farms and military bases around the world”(49). The author suggest,”Researchers who conduct experiments on animals argue that it would be unethical to test substances with potentially adverse side effects on humans; animals are good surrogates because their responses are similar to humans”(49).Bidnal contends with ,”However, some animals are chosen for other reasons”(49). According to Bindal, “Animal testing is not the only option in toxicity testing”(50). Bidnal states, “Alternatives are widely available and include human clinical and epidemiological studies; experiments with cadavers, volunteers,and patients; computer simulation and mathematical models; and in vitro (test tube) tissue culture techniques, to name just a
Today, millions of animals are being tested for the use of human products, causing them to fall ill and die, leaving them no choice but to be experimented on. Animal abuse can be more than what meets the eye. Specifically, animal testing is a form of animal abuse and usually ends in the death of a harmless animal. Some might say that there is no other way to test products, but due to the harm that is done and our advancements in science, animal testing should not be tolerated. Our advancements in science have enabled us to create other things that we can test on, instead of harming innocent animals.
In today’s society alternatives to animal testing are becoming more common because of the advanced changes in technology and the awareness of what occurs during animal testing. Animal testing is known to be cruel and inhumane. Animals in research laboratories live in small cages that do not allow much room for movement. These animals are never exposed to the outside world because usually after an experiment is completed the animals are euthanized. Animals are forced to endure painful and stressful proced...
Using animals for research and testing dates all the way back to 384 BC when Greek physician-scientists such as Galen, Erasistratus, and Aristotle conducted experiments on living animals. They used these experiments to help advance the understanding of anatomy, physiology and pathology. There is no denying that animal research has contributed to improving human health. Vaccinations against polio, measles, hepatitis and other diseases have all been found thanks to the use of testing on animals. However, that does not change the fact that animal testing for our own benefit is inhumane, costly and is often not reliable. For these reasons, I believe that there should be alternative ways for testing that do not involve harming animals, are cost-effective,
There are many things going on in today’s society, of which include animal testing. This is happening in many famous medical/cosmetics laboratories, including L'oreal and Suave. There are many different experiments done to these animals, including ones that change the mind and appearance of the animals themselves. Seeing as these animals are abused in well-known companies so often, it’s society’s job to help and try to stop it. These tests are performed on these helpless animals, who have no way of speaking up or telling us to stop. Because of this, a lot of the scientists who perform these tests believe that the animals have no rights at all. Animals do have rights, but because of the testing people think they have none at all. There are also instances where one animal is tested on repeatedly, giving its health some of the worst side effects. In the aftermath of these tests, the animals are struck with illness and (as a worst case scenario,) death. There are many different routes/forms for sickness to take in these cases as well, meaning there is a variety of bad side effects for each illness to take. These different illnesses and side effects of the illnesses will be bad for the animals’ health, seeing as they are, indeed, bad. These will be covered in the next paragraph.
To add to this, animal testing also shows that people, hurt and or kill animals with not much care. According to The US Department of Agriculture, (USDA), “in 2010 [about] 97,123 animals suffered pain during experiments” proving that, the same or even more animals die trying to save people from dying. The fact that the US Department of Agriculture even made this point true shows that animal testing is very harmful to the animals being tested on.With this evidence, it confirms that animal testing is not always the solution. Another set of data that shows this, talks about the lives of animals during the experiment. Reported by ProCon.org, this excerpt explains the “forced eating, inhaling and other actions” that the doctors put these animals through to receive a test result. Furthermore, in contrast to this side, many people are all for animal testing, or
As the times have changed so has people’s opinions on animal testing. In this quote it highlights an important new development in the ethical matter of animal testing. (2007) Society views towards animal research is an ethical dilemma, the polls show that a high amount of percentages. There was 84% in 1999, 90% in 2002 and 89% in 2005 of people ready to accept the use of animals in medical research if the research is for serious medical purposes.”(pg.27) these people feel strongly against suffering and want it minimized or having alternatives.”(pg. 27) Another view in animals testing is that it has allowed for new developments in medical disease. For many of the sickness that effect everyday humans much of the animals testing have help make a huge steps towards find a cure and more answers that are need. For instance the Embo Reports states an example for a screening of anit cancer drug. (2005) “For example, screening potential anti-cancer drugs uses the so-called hollow-fibre system, in which tumour cells are grown in a tube-like polymer matrix that is implanted into mice. Drugs are then administered, the tubes removed and the number of cells determined. This system has increased the amount of data that can be obtained per animal in some studies and has therefore reduced the number of mice used” (pg. 23). The theory of animals being used to give a glimpse in how to
The people claim that, animal testing infringes animal’s rights, make animal suffering in the experiments, and some of animal experiments may never useful to human beings. This is true, but we cannot stop animal testing. According to the article “Facts about Animal Research” by Cook (2006), the smallpox have been disappear from the earth because scientists get vaccines from cows. Also, the scientists get insulin, which is the only drug, which can control diabetes, from dogs and fishes. Many medicines are related to medical animal experiments, we cannot give up medical animal experiments. In addition, people consider that animal are suffering in the experiments. But according to the author Harish (2011), there are 44% of animals were used in experiments, which involve pain. What’s more, most of animals are get pain relief drugs in the experiments. That can make animals do not feel pain. So, the medical animal testing should be
Now that we have a good feeling to what animal testing is and where it is being done, I will explain why animal testing is wrong and the negatives that come from it. Humans are animals, so it may seem like non-human animals are perfect for finding out answers that we may not know about medications, chemicals, and products. But what people do not understand is that these animals are suffering. Animals and humans are morally equal therefore animals should be awarded the same respect as humans (Liou, July 6, 2010). As animal rights activist, Ingrid E. Newkirk quotes, “When it comes to having a central nervous system, and the ability to feel pain, hunger, and thirst, a rat is a pig, a pig is a dog, and a dog is a boy.” We all feel, think and behave in the same way but we still continue to harm and test animals for our own benefit without giving them a say. This is well said by Indian philosopher and poet, Sri Aurobindo, when he says “Life is life- whether in a cat, dog, or man. There is no difference between a cat or man. The idea of difference is a humans conception for man’s own advantage.”
More and more medical and cosmetic companies are being exposed for testing their products on animals. Animal experimentation makes for a very controversial topic because animal are getting killed by scientists trying to find information on new medication. They’re are ways to help with the limitation but it is a necessary to find out research on a product.
Many animals such as rats, mice, dogs, cats, birds, and monkeys are forced endure unnecessary pain due to animal testing. It is inhumane to use animals for toxicity testing because the animals are left to suffer or die after they are used. According to an online article, “some are forced to inhale toxic fumes, others are immobili...
First of all, animal testing should be banned in order to protect the rights of animals. In other words, animals’ rights are infringed by experimenting on them. Animals and humans are similar in many ways. To begin with, they have similar levels of biological complexity. They both are aware that they exist and they both make conscious choices. Philosophy professor at North Carolina State University Tom Regan points out "Animals have a basic moral right to respectful treatment. This inherent value is not respected when animals are reduced to being mere tools in a scientific experiment." (F. B. Orlans) Experimentation on an animal ...
Animal testing has been used since early Greek times by physicians when they tested on live animals; since then it’s just continued and it is a cruel way of “testing science”. Through researching about animal testing one will see vivid and horrifying pictures of animals before testing, while they look so incredibly terrified and after testing when they look even worse, bloody, burned, bruised and tortured. Being tortured day in and day out with deadly medical treatments and being indefensible has become these animals everyday lifestyle. Scientist treat lab animals like they are not a living subject only a lab tool that is used for crude testing. All of this testing is unnecessary yet it continues on instead of using all of the new alternatives that are more effective and accurate.
For many years now, animals have been used for testing and experimentation. Many organizations like PETA and the ARF (Animal Rescue Foundation) strongly oppose the topic of animals being experimented on. Many people are against animal testing as a whole because not only does it harm animals, but many times they may be killed. There have been many countless years and protests against testing, and they deserved to be heard and listened to. People have begun to realize that not only does animal testing harm and kill animals every year; it has been pretty much useless.