Argumentative Essay: Is The Vietnam War Justified?

645 Words2 Pages

You asked me a while ago about my opinion on this conflict occurring in Vietnam, and I thought deeply about it in the meantime while awaiting my other colleagues to write back. After giving it some thought, I have declared that I do not support the Vietnam War because I personally believe that this conflict is absolutely meaningless. The primary reason as to why this war started is because communism was seeking to expand into Vietnam much the way it had attempted to expand into Korea, and of course we have our policy to contain any threats toward the well being of the citizens of any nation risking the overthrow of a government. Now I am not disagreeing with the protecting of other nations, as that is a justified priority. However, engaging in a war with an easily corruptible government such, as Vietnam's is foolish, as it was their own choice to practice communism. Nevertheless, the United States had to be the totalitarian nation that it is and send tens of thousands of kids to their deaths over in a foreign land just to hold the communists to what they had prior to their expansion(s). The government has justified this response to Vietnam's corruption with something called the Domino Theory; that if Vietnam …show more content…

Of course, with such a crisis at hand, the government had to come up with an address to this theory without seeming like the imperialists they truly are- and they did exactly that. The American government set up a fake "terrorist attack" also known as the Gulf of Tonkin incident. In response to the Gulf of Tonkin Incident, the U.S. Congress passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which essentially permitted the use of ground forces in Vietnam. In my personal opinion, I believe that the incident was a hoax- just another justification to distribute "peace" and "justice" throughout countries that already dislike us and disapprove of our

Open Document