Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why horse slaughter is okay essay
Why horse slaughter is okay essay
Why horse slaughter is okay essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why horse slaughter is okay essay
Horse Slaughter from Another Perspective When you first hear the term slaughter, often the first thing that comes to mind is how “horrible” the facilities are said to be. However, most of these statements are ignorant and the people are unaware of what really happens in a slaughterhouse. Slaughter of most animals is usually very humane and safe. Although when it comes to horses, not so much. When you look at all the aspects of horse slaughter, most of their explanations are rather reasonable. Personally, I would be completely for horse slaughter if I knew that the horses were being put down in a humane way, which they are not. On the other hand, I also understand why some would be against it. Horses are often seen as companion animals. However, they are still a branch of livestock. If we can eat cattle, sheep, pigs, chickens, etc. then why can’t we eat horses? There are about 33,000 wild horses roaming the United States as we speak. As our nation grows, the less land we will have to keep up with these wild horses. When it comes to over population of pigs or deer, what do we do? It’s easy, it becomes deer hunting season for hunters all over the U.S. However, for horses, that’s not an option. Eventually, the overpopulation of horses could cause rangelands to be stripped bare and could even cause a …show more content…
Therefore, rodeo, show, race, etc. horses should not be used for slaughter. Talk about GMOs. The horses that should be sent to slaughter would be horses with a clean system, not the 2-year-old race horse who messed up on his last race. Wild horses should be sold either to buyers who plan to use their horses, whether it be contest or recreational use or to slaughter facilities. However, most drugs given to livestock do have a withdraw time to make sure there is no trace of it in their meat once
The current situation today, is that horses and donkeys have exceeded the amount needed to maintain an ecological balance; from 26,600 wildlife to 38,300 wildlife. The horse program, enacted by the bill passed in 1971, costs the government approximately $49 million a year. It takes the majority of the budget to manage the already captured horses; taking into account the life of the horses, it has been concluded that the total cost would be closer to $1 billion (Dean Bolstad, Roundup of Wild Horses.). A federal law, allows the Bureau of Land Management to kill “excess horses to maintain what it calls ‘a thriving natural ecological balance’” (Ginger Kathrens).
This type of sport gives people the chance to show off their skills at handling wild livestock. Each cowboy or cowboys do an event, and are scored based on their performances. Then the team or individual with the most points wins. Rodeos even have events for the younger generations. Of course, the kids don’t rope cows or ride broncs, but they do sometimes get to catch pigs or chickens to win money. Tremendous amounts of time, and work go into rodeos, and they are extremely entertaining to watch. However, some people believe rodeo is nothing but torturing innocent animals. They believe animals are thrown into an arena without anyone caring what happens to them. Some people also believe after bulls, and horses can no longer be used in a rodeo they are sent to slaughter. A big reason people are so determined that this is animal cruelty is because they believe that the cowboys are purposely hurting animals to make themselves look like a good
For as long as there have been horse slaughterhouses in the United States, they have been an issue of controversy (Associated Press State and Local Wire, 8/7/01). Currently, only two slaughterhouses that produce horse meat intended...
The use of horses for human consumption dates back to the earliest use of animals for human consumption. Horses are used for food in many counties but are also considered inhumane in other countries. In the United States specifically, horsemeat is not the norm for consumed meat. There seems to be a problem that has arisen. It is suspected that horses being slaughtered at horse slaughtering factories are not the most up to date, pain free for the horse, and human as people suspect them to be like beef kill floors.
citizens have different ways they see horses. Citizens see horses as worker; food; pet and companions. Activist believe horse slaughter is barbaric; and believe congress's actions will lead to the reopening of slaughter houses in the U.S. (“Horse Slaughter May Return”). Many equestrians and breeders are against horse slaughter, but what happens if the people against slaughter actually caused the problem.
The “Bucks only” laws passed years ago to help in re-establishing the dwindling deer herds now work against the deer by resulting in an overabundance of does. Even with the overabundance of does, many hunters refuse to shoot a doe. They believe in the old saying, “It takes a doe to yield a buck.” This is entirely true, but it ignores the basic law of nature that any piece of land, and the food and cover in it, can support so much game. If the excess game is not harvested by hunters or killed by predators, nature will take over and exterminate enough animals as needed, or more through disease and starvation.
Grand champion! I was riding Fancy, a paint horse, at the Dallas County Fair in the Horsemanship class. In this class, I had to complete a pattern and it was judged on how well each horse and rider completed the pattern. The judge felt that Fancy and I performed best and awarded me with a big purple ribbon and a trophy with a horse on top. At the end of the fair, all of the grand champions were announced before the races. That was the final reward for successfully showing a horse in competitions.
“The animals are reducing the number of trees and seedlings and affecting which species will survive, forestry experts say” (NBC news). A wildlife professor estimated that deer cause at least $750 million in damage to the timber industry. This becomes a big impact on the economy. “We view it as problem of our own making,” said Laura Simon, field director of urban wildlife and sanctuaries program for the Humane Society of the United States. “We have created an ideal landscape for deer.” (NBC news). Deer are said to eat anything and everything, this is especially proven when farms have their crops
There is a very important distinction when dealing with animal welfare and animal rights. After learning to tell the difference between the two, it is easier to distinguish the organization that wants to help animals and the people who wish to end the use of animals. Even though there are different groups that support different agendas for the sport, both should have the same goal. Animal rights are organizations that seek to end the ownership and use of animals. The largest of those groups are The Humane Society and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. There is a ‘Pro-Rodeo’ organization under the guise ‘Friends of Rodeo.’ They claim to be the only organization solely devoted to protecting and promoting the sport of rodeo, all of rodeo regardless of association affiliation. “What rodeo proponents fail to acknowledge is that rodeos harm animals that are forced to perform in a competition that is essentially a display of human domination over other species” (The Rodeo 1).
For many people across the United States rodeo is how they make a living. Weather its competing, selling, or just working behind the sense, they depend on rodeo for a job. Not only do humans depend on rodeo for a job, but so do all types of animals. Not all horses are cut out for the same job just as all humans are not. Many animal rights groups use words like animal cruelty and unsafe to describe a rodeo, but underneath the tough exterior strict rules combat the use of these words by cutting down on the unsafe and cruel events. Rodeo, despite being a dangerous sport, benefits a community in many ways and does not condone animal cruelty in any way. It is a place where a community of people can show their skills, sell their products, and find friendships with people just like them.
For decades, Scientists have contemplated the idea of using horses for the personal gain of children and adults with needs such as autism, heart conditions, anxiety, stress, and other disorders that have yet to be curable. Horses such as Chester, a twenty year old gelding has encouraged more young riders who face difficulties such as social skills, behavior skills, and those who are physically indisposed. The phrase confidence is key, becomes important when people of all ages interact with a horse. Learning confidence may not be as easy as it sounds but is a necessary step to bond with a horse; without it, there can be no trust and most importantly, no bond between the equine and its rider.
Day to day horses are abused, people start a long downward spiral into horse racing gambling addiction, and less and less people are watching horse racing. But we can stop it all, by one simple step. Shutting down all horse racing. You can get involved by telling more and more people about this, or with “Horse Racing Week” and let’s stop all the horses that are born and have nowhere to go but the slaughterhouse. All the people’s families who are worried sick all the time. Let’s help. We cannot let one more horse die while running a race for the greedy, selfish horse racing industry.
In this paper, I will discuss whether the white horse paradox can be rationalized by the interpretations of a descriptional reference theory, an indexical language theory, and a direct reference theory. By criticizing Zhuangzi’s indexical language theory, I will conclude that the paradox is justified by a direct reference theory. Gongsun Longzi argues that a white horse is not a horse in terms of their identity. A horse is an animal of shape, which is defined by specific physical characteristics. In contrast, a white horse is an animal of both shape and color, which is defined by both physical features and the color white.
Should the torture of an innocent animal go unpunished? No, it should not; the real question is to what extent should the perpetrator be punished? The most basic definition of animal abuse is the intentional act of inflicting physical pain, suffering, or death on an animal; this includes monstrous neglect (the act of withholding food and water) that causes an animal to suffer, die, or be put in imminent danger of death. Currently, animal cruelty offenders are not punished to the extent that some believe they should be. Animal cruelty should receive mandatory jail time because the abuse towards an innocent animal is deemed inhumane and oftentimes is a precursor for violence against humans.
Animal Cruelty has many forms, many reasons and most importantly many victims. It is a growing problem in today’s society. Many people may wonder why people abuse animals. The thought is simple, however the answer is a little more complex, there are three main types of animal cruelty. The three reasons are as follows: unintentional, intentional, and cruel intentions. I will discuss each one in more detail.