Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of gun control laws
Gun violence and control
How can we control gun violence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of gun control laws
Gun Control The topic of gun control has always been a touchy issue. The people for gun control will argue that taking away guns will decrease crime and homicide. The people against gun control will argue that guns are used for protection. Although the topic is very controversial, knowing the facts is important before you pick a side. The first gun control law was in 1837, in Georgia where they banned handguns. That law was removed eight years later, however, because of the 2nd amendment (Goforth). The first federal law was in 1934, when Franklin D. Roosevelt made the “New Deal for Crime.” The National Firearms Act of 1934, levies $200 tax on the manufacturing and sale of machine guns and sawed off shotguns ("Washington Post"). Roosevelt …show more content…
In the 1990’s to the 2000’s, firearm related homicide decreased about 50% after gun control laws (“What Are The Gun Control Effects on Crime and Murder”). It’s been shown though that harsh gun control has a negative effect on crime rate. In washington D.C., 1976, an extreme gun control law was pushed and the murder rate rose 134%. Another example is in New York, in the 1970’s nineteen of killings involved pistols, but after the the gun control law was made it rose to fifty percent (“What Are The Gun Control Effects on Crime and Murder”). States with few gun restrictions like New Hampshire and Vermont tend to have low crime and murder rates with Vermont being forty-ninth in crime and forty-seventh in murder (“What Are The Gun Control Effects on Crime and Murder”). Also, states with concealed carry laws have had murder rates drop about eight percent, rape drop five percent, assault drop seven percent, and robbery drop three percent (“What Are The Gun Control Effects on Crime and Murder”). Justin King from MintPress News states that gun control can have very little impact on the murder rate. In Australia, guns were banned in 1996. The murder rate rose a little but returned to the rate it was originally quickly (King). Nearly the same thing happened in Ireland in 1972. A ban on guns made the murder rate, rise but it dropped back down eventually
In discussions of Gun Control, one controversial issue has been whether it reduced or increases crime. On the one hand, author Jeffrey Goldberg argues having stricter gun controls could reduce gun violence. On the other hand, author Alex Seitz-Wald thinks increasing civilian gun ownership will not reduce crime. My own view is that if we did have more restrictions to own a gun, we would be more safer and we would have fewer crimes around the world
Moorhouse, John C., and Brent Wanner. "Does Gun Control Reduce Crime or Does Crime Increase Gun Control?" CATO Journal 26.1 (2006): 103-24. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 15 June 2015.
In this article the author talks about the relationship between gun control laws and gun ownership rates in relation to crime rates. He informs his readers of the studies to determine whether gun ownership rates have any effect on criminal activity being that firearms are the leading cause of murders; and if by making gun control laws stricter will it lower the violent crime rates, and overall homicide rates.
John R. Lott, Jr., PhD, author of More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws, stated, "States with the largest increases in gun ownership also have the largest drops in violent crimes... The effect on 'shall-issue ' [concealed gun] laws on these crimes [where two or more people were killed] has been dramatic. When states passed these laws, the number of multiple-victim shootings declined by 84 percent. Deaths from these shootings plummeted on average by 90 percent and injuries by 82
According to Mark Gius, the author of “Gun Ownership and the Gun Control Index”, “.only about 25% of total violent crime is committed by a person using a gun, no inferences should be drawn regarding the possible relationship between gun control laws and non-homicidal violent crime rates” (498).... ... middle of paper ... ... That is a great idea.
Regulation of guns is a necessary action that needs to be taken in order to
Since the birth of United States of America, guns have been sewn into the fabric of American culture. Guns were used for many meaningful things in those primitive times. Guns were used to protect one’s property from wild animals such as bears. Guns were used to hunt down protein-rich animals to feed families. Guns were used to defend American’s newly constituted freedoms from savage criminals, Native Americans, and European forces. Guns fit well into the fabric of American culture has stood the test of time. Today, however, the fabric that once brought the United States prosperity is now fraying and flawed due to the excessive use of guns. This addiction has shown to be a problem in several areas of American society, and statistics prove America
Gun laws control the types of firearms that may be purchased, designate the qualifications of those who may purchase and own a firearm, and restrict the safe storage and use of firearms. Advocates for gun control laws argue that with these laws in place the incidence of violent crimes are reduced because the prevalence of firearms is reduced or in other words fewer guns mean less crime. But this only holds some truth because the relationship between gun control and crime rates don’t effect each other immediately. A law that is put into place won’t see any effect crime rates until a few years down the road. A study taken in the 1997, found that the right-to-carry laws reduce violent crime rates. The reductions are greater in counties with proportionally higher urban populations and the laws afford relatively greater protection to minorities and women. The study also shows that criminals substitute non confrontation crimes such as burglary, auto theft, and larceny, for violent crimes such as robbery and assault (Moorhouse et al., 2006). Thirty five states now permit law abiding residents to carry a concealed weapon (Malcom and L., 2003). With concealed weapons laws in place, the probability of a criminal coming to a confrontation with an armed citizen has increased. As such, right-to-carry laws
Gun control is an awfully big issue in the United States today. Many people in America don’t agree with the gun control laws that they have today. Gun control laws only take guns and freedom away from law-abiding citizens. Many citizens have their own reasons for owning a gun. Why would the government want to make it harder for people to own a gun? People that own guns aren’t very likely to be attacked by criminals. Owning a handgun is one of the best ways of protection when used correctly. The second amendment states “the right to bear arms”; does this grant everyone the right to own a gun? Gun control laws have not been proven to do anything for citizens. Gun control laws just make it harder for the good guy average Joe to own a gun. Gun control laws are not a good idea, and are taking part in the loss of our freedom that was given to us.
The United States has a long history with the establishment of gun control laws. In 1791, the 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was ratified, declaring “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” New York passed the “Sullivan Act” in 1911, which allowed someone to purchase a gun with a permit required. This was just the beginning. In 1934, Congress passed the “National Firearms Act” which gave someone a $200 tax on gun sales requiring guns to be registered with the treasury. the “Gun Control Act” was passed in 1968, outlawing mail order sales of rifles and guns. Also, Bill Clinton signed the “Violent Crime Control” and “Law Enforcement Act” into law in 1994, which banned the manufacture and sales of assault weapons. The Supreme Court in 1997 declared background checks of the “Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act” unconstitutional which has left a huge impact on society, in which guns are getting in the hands of people with mental illness. Overall, gun control laws have had a long history with the United States, with much more to come.
The debate over gun control in America has constantly brought up over the years due to gunmen killing large amounts of civilizations in shootings. From Columbine to Sandy Hook or the shootings of the two reporters in West Virginia, these public shootings are occurring everywhere. Lawmakers and civilians alike are pushing for increased gun control in hopes of preventing the same tragedies. Anybody that has been affected by the shootings have been pushing Congress and state governments to force new sanctions on government. With the past three years, Congress has shot down all the laws despite the large amounts of public support. Adding more gun control isn’t going to stop the mass shootings from happening.
Mass murders in the United States have increased due to weak implications of gun laws. In the United States,
The right to bear arms is guaranteed in the constitution by the Second Amendment. Liberals are looking to amend the constitution any way they can. They want to ban handguns or at least restrict sales. Studies have shown that gun control cannot stop people from committing the crime.
middle of paper ... ... Law enforcement and criminal imprisonment have more of an effect on crime than any gun control law. Gun education and hunter’s education also improved. Focusing efforts on the root of the problem has yielded results and lowered crime.
Listverse,. '10 Arguments For Gun Control - Listverse '. N.p., 2014. Web. 30 Oct. 2014.