Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Domestic violence introduction
Gender roles today
Gender roles today
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Domestic violence introduction
In our debate we discussed whether women are just as violent as men. The pro side of the debate said yes women are just as violent as men, and the opposing side said men are more violent than women. In the yes side of the debate violence was described as physical and emotional assaults. As in violent acts carried out with the intention of causing another person physical pain or injury, no matter whether actual injury occurs, and any unjust, cruel act, or maltreatment of another human being. In the no side of the debate violence was just described as physical assaults, and not emotional assaults. This paper will discuss both sides of the debate, and the pros and cons of the arguments made by both sides.
The pro side of the debate used the introduction to mention the research they found that supports their claim that women are just as violent as men. Some facts that were found were that Straus and his colleagues carried out a survey to find what type of violence is carried out in family homes. One of the findings of Straus and his colleagues' national surveys was that women were evidently as likely to utilize violence in response to couple conflict as were men. A scale was used to interpret the findings of the survey. Results from the Conflict Tactics Scale, also known as CTS, used in the National Family Violence Surveys indicated that men and women are equally violent.This study was conducted in 1975, and was replicated in 1985, and both studies indicate almost perfect symmetry in the use of violence by men and women against their partners (Johnson, 1995). The symmetry of the two surveys helps to prove that women and men are equally violent, because it shows the scale to be reliable. Another piece of information the pro side disco...
... middle of paper ...
...at men should be strong and masculine. Also, police are less likely to arrest a woman for assault because of this stereotype which is another reason for under reporting. The articles that say men are more violent than women say women underreport violence, because they are ashamed. There are pros and cons to each of the arguments, and hopefully more research will be done, so there will be a more clear answer to who is more violent, a man or a woman.
Works Cited
Arriaga, X., & Oskamp, S. 1999. Violence in intimate partner relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE Publications.
Headey, B., Scott, D., & Vaus, D. 199. Domestic violence in Australia: are women and men equally violent? Australian Social Monitor 2: 57-62.
Michael P. Johnson. 1995. Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family 57.
Men aren’t violent people from birth, they’re just taught that violence is a reasonable, celebrated way to assert and prove their masculinity. 2. Hiding in Plain Sight: Question #5 When reporting on men’s violence against women, journalists use passive voice and avoid gender altogether. They say things like, “that woman was raped” rather than, “that man raped that woman” as a way to make rape culture seem like a women’s issue.
"Violence against women-it's a men's issue." Jackson Katz:. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Apr. 2014. .
Straus, M. A., & Yllo, K. (1990). Patriarchy and violence against wives: The impact of structural and normative factors. Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in, 8(145), 383-399.
“‘Instrumental’ violence, however, murder for a purpose, - political power, rape, sadistic pleasure, robbery, or some other base gratification – remains the domain of the male. After all, every male is a potential killer in the form of a warrior – and he only becomes a murderer when he misuses his innate physical and socialized capacity to kill for ignoble, immoral, and impolitic reason. While the male is built and programmed to destroy, the female nests, creates, and nurtures. Or so the story goes”.
...nd incidence of such violence, there still seems to be gaps amongst the research that creates links to other aspects of IPV. By providing a further analysis of how women go from being the victim to the offender, it may create a more realistic understanding of why the recent intimate partner homicide/violence rates for women offenders has increased. Perhaps society needs to not see females as become more serious 'aggressors' and 'bad girls' but rather as women who are finally fighting back. By relating the social learning theory, the self defense theory as well as the male proprietariness theory to intimate partner violence it creates a more thorough understanding of the causes and affects of this form of violence. Conceivably, future directions of research on intimate partner violence should investigate the reasoning behind this new 'husband abuse' phenomenon.
Violent behavior by men against their family members were traditionally considered private matters. We recognize public violence as being morally wrong or socially destructive. Domestic violence and child abuse are two forms of private violence that were more or less immune from public scrutiny and considered inappropriate for "outsiders" to intervene in unless the problem reached extreme proportions.
Renzetti, C. (1999). The challenge to Feminism posed by Women’s use of violence in intimate relationships.
Since 1970, there has been an increasing and alarming rise 138 percent of violent crimes committed by women. Still, while the equivalent percentage compared to male violence is small 15 percent to 85 percent the fact that the numbers have elevated so drastically points to something changing in society.
Tjaden, P., Thoennes, N. (2000b). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
National data gives us an indication of the severity of this issue. When 1 in 5-woman report being victims of severe physical violence (NISVS, 2010), we must ask ourselves if enough is being done to prevent this from occurring. From a historical point, there has always almost been a distinction from men on woman violence. Based on the disparity of cases reported, male inflicted violence on females is much higher and prevalent. When the perpetrators of DV, and IPV are predominately males, we can no longer dismissed this issue as a cultural, or
The. “Gender and Homicide: A Comparison of Men and Women Who Kill.” Violence and Victims 5(4): 227-242. Keeney, Belea T. and Kathleen M. Heide. 1994. The 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the The “Gender Differences in Serial Murderers”. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
It seems that hegemonic masculinity does a great deal in explaining male-perpetrated familicide, but it fails to explain female perpetrators. There is a great lack of gender symmetrical explanations of interpersonal violence. However, as the 21st century continues, and there is a continued strive for gender equality, there is good chance that there will be an increasing amount of gender based research on violence.
Domestic violence is not just fighting, hitting or an occasional argument. It’s a chronic abuse of power. The abuser of domestic violence, controls and tortures the victim of threats, intimidation, and physical violence. Domestic violence is one of the leading causes of violence in America. The abusers are not only men, women can be abusers as well. Women make up the vast majority of domestic violence. According to the American Bar Association (ABA), 90-95% of domestic violence victims are females and 70% of intimidating homicides are females. Domestic violence is a serious crime and everyone needs to be aware of its effects. This essay presents and explains the evidence supporting the major risk factors for intimate partner homicides.
In 1974, a study was done which compared male and female domestic violence. In that study, it was found that 47% of husbands had used physical violence on their wives, and 33% of wives had used violence on their husbands (Gelles 1974). Half of the respondents in this study were selected from either cases of domestic violence reported to the police, or those identified by the social service agency.
Violence against women (VAW) is now considered and recognized as a public health predicament and a human rights infringement of a worldwide scale and force (Ono, 2013; Raj & Silverman, 2002). Research evidence exists for it serving as a crucial social determinant of health and its resulting vast and damaging impact on physical and mental health for women in Canada (Sharma, 2001). Violence as a concept includes diverse forms of abuse that are directed at women and girls across their lifetime. One critical category or form of violence against women is domestic violence. For the purpose of this paper terms violence against women and domestic violence will be used interchangeably. Domestic violence has been recognized as a critical social problem