Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Moral judgement, ethical decision making
Moral judgement, ethical decision making
Essay on moral judgement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Moral judgement, ethical decision making
In philosophy and ethics, an ancient debate has raged on for centuries. A seemingly simple question has led some of the greatest philosophers ever to lock horns. Are humans inherently good or evil? I believe we are good, however we have different ideas of what “good” is, or circumstance forces us to turn evil.
First of all, to debate this we must understand what “good” is. Is “good” fairness, or being kind to other? One interesting definition is Aristotle’s, who proposed that how good something is depends on how well it performs it’s function. For example, since knives are meant to cut and sharp knives cut well, a sharp knife is a good knife. In reality, we all have different concepts of what good is. If you look at people like Hitler, you
…show more content…
can see that he believed he was doing a good thing by purifying bloodlines. However, as you can see in Night by Elie Wiesel, he thought it was reasonable to do so by committing genocide against the Jewish people. Most people are not like Hitler though, and are good people. We try to do right by following our ideas of good, which shows our inherent “goodness”. Furthermore, pretty much everybody is born as a “good” person. Having volunteered over a hundred hours at children’s camps, I have seen how children try to be kind to each other, and share what they have. And even when we are not toddlers we are still good people. Look at your friends and the people around. Most if not all of them are “good” people. In addition, I have heard the arguments that many people like scammers and thieves know what they are doing is bad or evil, yet they continue doing it.
However, a study by Stanford University found that many career criminals, rapists, drug users, etc. were abused as children, had a rough childhood, or had traumatic experiences. And, there have been many incidents of mothers having to resort to stealing small amounts of food to feed their children and save them from starving. In these cases, these people were inherently good, it’s just that their experiences or the circumstances they were in shaped or forced them to do some morally wrong things. If you provide them access to therapy and new opportunities, they can be good. But even if most people are inherently good, not all are. Many serial killers or rapists are just purely evil people. This just comes down to the majority over the minority. As actor Patton Oswalt said, “If it’s one person or a HUNDRED people, that number is not even a fraction of a percent of the population on this planet [...] The vast majority stand against that darkness [..] We would not be here if humanity was inherently evil. We’d have eaten ourselves long ago.” We cannot judge everybody because of the actions of a minority, so as a majority, we are
good. In conclusion, we as humans are good. We try to do the right things and do them the right way. While a fraction of us are evil because of our circumstances, we cannot let the outliers define us. We are and always will be inherently good.
There are many different points of view about human behaviors. Through specific characters mentioned in Fahrenheit 451, “A Very Old Man Enormous Wings”, and “The Lottery”, individual attitudes are exaggerated to the point that their evil motivations behind their behaviors are obvious. Everyday humans attempt to attach the connotation of good to humanity, but it’s just because humans want to look past the fact that we are realistically not good. It is very difficult for us to reflect on our own behaviors. Even though people try to avoid admitting it, we always try to be the best in whatever we do. We naturally make our own survivals the best we can make it. Harming others knowingly and enjoying it is a hallmark of being evil. Good is not only
Are humans naturally good, or evil? Many people argue both ways. It has been argued for centuries, and many authors have written about it. One example of this is Samuel Clemens's, more commonly known as Mark Twain, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. The book follows a young boy, named Huckleberry, and a runaway slave, named Jim, as they both run away. Huck runs away to escape being civilized, while Jim runs away from slavery. Together, they talk about life, philosophy, and friends. As they travel down the Mississippi River, both Huck and Jim learn various life lessons. In The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Huck witnesses the depravity of human nature on his journey on the Mississippi River.
The lines that define good and evil are not written in black and white; these lines tend to blur into many shades of grey allowing good and evil to intermingle with each another in a single human being. Man is not inherently good or evil but they are born innocent without any values or sense of morality until people impart their philosophies of life to them. In the words of John Locke:
In the article "Frivolity of Evil" Theodore Dalrymple, psychiatrist Anthony Daniels narrates his fourteen years in the prison hospital. Daniels says that man is intrinsically evil and the rest of the society is not evil. New evils are met and older evils are disappeared, with the outbreak of every evil. Man will act normal until a new evil is raised and catches on. More a person performs well and is supposed as being good, they are supposed to be less evil.
I believe that humans are generally good. I believe inheritance and the environment play a role in the “bad” decisions one chooses to make. I think humans are flawed but if they accept God as their creator and worship him,
“In the long run, we shape our lives, and we shape ourselves. The process never ends until we die. And the choices we make are ultimately our own responsibility.” (Eleanor Roosevelt). This is just one of the infinite examples of how human nature has been explored by so many different people. Each and every human is born with the capability of making their own choices. The decisions that they will make in the future will determine how evil they are viewed by others. Although one’s nature and nurture do affect their life, it is their own free will that determines whether or not they are evil.
Phillip Pullman, a British author, once wrote, “I stopped believing there was a power of good and a power of evil that were outside us. And I came to believe that good and evil are names for what people do, not for what they are”(goodreads.com). Pullman’s quotation on the actions of man being the source of good and evil closely relate to morality, principles regarding the distinction of right and wrong or a person’s values. The question of what human morality truly is has been pondered by philosophers, common folk, and writers for thousands of years. However, sometimes a person’s ethics are unclear; he or she are not wholly good or bad but, rather, morally ambiguous.
Are humans naturally good or evil? This age-old question dates back to as early as the Chinese Dynasty and is still being argued to this day. Thomas Hobbes believed that all humans were born cruel, that they began cheating others to benefit themselves. Whereas, John Locke believes that humans are born good and pure, but become evil based on experiences and obstacles in life. In my opinion, all humans are born good and become cruel based on their experiences. I feel this way because when you look at a new born baby, they are seeing the world for the first time, and although they are screaming and crying, they are pure. They do not want to do anyone any harm, and you do not wish to cause them any harm. The same goes for young, growing children
How exactly does the human brain work? Are humans evil by nature or are they good samaritans most, if not all, the time? As studies throughout history have shown, this is not the case. Humans are inherently evil because they are always seeking as much power as they can, revert to challenging authority and selfishness in times of peril, and become intimidated easily by “authority” figures egging them on, which is reflected in The Lord of the Flies by William Golding, as well as The Zimbardo Experiment conducted by Psychologist Phillip Zimbardo.
...ly or mentally, a conscious effort to injure others that is no obvious benefit to the human race is not good. I believe that people try to do good most of the time. For example, the person had a motorcycle accident. He hated by a car on the local road and stocked under the car. The car was flamed. This news is from the yesterday of FOX25. When I saw many people stopped and together to get the car off the person and being without thinking about the flames, I am so grateful. The man was saved and no life injury and the story have a good ending. Accordingly, people are innately good. I think I am actually a good person. I like to open doors, push in chairs, listen to people, and help little kids. No meter outside the world how changed it doesn’t influence my good personality at all. I agree Carl Rogers’s theory people should be capable of becoming conscious good.
Some people are mostly good, some are mostly bad, but none are good or evil.
Fundamentally are people essentially good, or not? This has been a question that has been repeatedly asked throughout humanity. For thousands of years, writers have been debating whether humans have a basically good nature that is corrupted by society, or a basically bad nature that is kept in check by society. This is because, as readers we admire people who are good, that aren’t powerful in the typical conventional way. Such as, greed, status, money, etc.
The Earth is composed of billions of people. Billions of people that all have different genetic makeup, personal experiences,and cultural differences. The definition of what makes a good person is something that varies arbitrarily throughout the world. Nevertheless, no one can change the fact that all societies have followed some sort of similar moral ethics. Humans being innate value in morality is something that has stumped people throughout the ages. The innate value that humans have in the miracle of life, is ... To put it simply a good person is someone that innately respects morality and cares for the happiness and well being of others. a good person will feel feel empathy and guilt for the people that they have hurt physically or mentally, and forgive those who have hurt them.
The perception of good and bad is varied, but to be good or bad is very different. Many are misled by the term and so I will now define it. What us people call being good is genuinely triggered by actions or kind gestures. Actions as such serving your country regards killing to survive. Then you have kind gestures such as giving money to the homeless or to a charity. This is a sympathetic gesture so we class it as good.
Are human beings born to be good? Or are we naturally born to be evil? A person’s nature or essence is a trait that is inherent and lasting in an individual. To be a good person is someone who thinks of others before themselves, shows kindness to one another, and makes good choices in life that can lead to a path of becoming a good moral person. To be a bad person rebels against something or someone thinking only of them and not caring about the consequences of their actions. Rousseau assumed, “that man is good by nature (as it is bequeathed to him), but good in a negative way: that is, he is not evil of his own accord and on purpose, but only in danger of being contaminated and corrupted by evil or inept guides and examples (Immanuel Kant 123).” In other words, the human is exposed to the depraved society by incompetent guardians or influences that is not of one’s free will in the view of the fact that it is passed on. My position is humans are not by nature evil. Instead, they are good but influenced by the environment and societies to act in evil ways to either harm others or themself.