Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Arguments for drilling in alaska 2000
Opponents of drilling in ANWR
Arguments for drilling in alaska 2000
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Arguments for drilling in alaska 2000
This article offers insight to the controversial topic of whether or not to drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) in Alaska. It’s main solution is to converse with environmentalists on the issue to determine if it is worth the risks and suitable for the environment. The first issue addressed by the article is the difference that private property makes when it comes to managing multi use resources. It gives an example regarding the Audubon Society and how they own a 26,000-acre preserve in Louisiana that contains valuable natural gas and oil reserves, along with homes for an abundance of wildlife. The example describes how the Society has not sacrificed ints environmental values for drilling, but the drilling has “served to reaffirm and promote the values in a way to help others achieve their own purposes”. Therefore, the issues of drilling on private properties can be minimized when the opposing parties discover mutual benefits (Lee 217). …show more content…
This is an issue because environmental groups have no incentive to take into account the benefits of drilling. The article suggests that they are concerned about protecting the environment in area they have ownership interest, but ANWR is publicly owned. Therefore, it is not sensible for environmentalists to decide whether or not it is okay to drill. The author of the article states that if the environmentalists were responsible for both the costs and the benefits of drilling, then they would see the advantages of drilling in ANWR. Also, environmentalists would easily be able to afford hundreds of acres of land elsewhere in exchange for what they would receive for each acre of ANWR land sold (Lee
The environment needs protecting because even before the drilling started hunting was rapidly decreasing the amount of animals in the area. So if drilling occured in Alaska the animal count would go down even more. Drilling is gonna need space, and because Alaska is a mountained and woodland area they will have to make space by destroying trees etc. Destroying trees means destroying animals’ homes. According to document E ‘just look 60 miles west to Prudhoe bay- an oil complex that has turned 1,000 square miles of fragile tundra into a sprawling industrial zone containing, 1,500 miles of roads and pipes’. Also the document states that the would be
Blacksad: Vol 2 Arctic Nation is written by spanish author Juan Díaz Canales and drawn by spanish artist Juanjo Guarnido. The story and setting is film noir style, in late 1950s Americana with all anthropomorphic characters. The story begins when private investigator Blacksad sees a lynching of a black vulture, where he meets a reporter named Weekly (weasel), his future sidekick. It is revealed that Blacksad is working for Elementary school teacher Miss Grey, who asks to look for a missing girl named Kaylie, and tells him her suspicions that the girl was kidnapped by white supremacist group Arctic Nation. After befriending Weekly, they go to local dinner joint, where they are harassed by members of Arctic Nation. After this encounter, they are at the police station, where it is revealed that the leader of Arctic Nation
This Paper will describe and analyze three articles pertaining to the ongoing debate for and against Glen Canyon Dam. Two of these articles were found in the 1999 edition of A Sense of Place, and the third was downloaded off a site on the Internet (http://www.glencanyon.net/club.htm). These articles wi...
Despite protecting millions of acres of wilderness, this act provided for the numerous groups of people affected by the establishment of this law. Stipulations regarding the use of protected lands by private landowners were made. People living inside the park lands were guaranteed the right to subsistence hunting and fishing, as well as the guaranteed access to their lands. This right of access is the main concern for this argument, as it is a major management issue for park officials and land owners alike.
..."Alaska Oil Spill Fuels Concerns Over Arctic Wildlife, Future Drilling." National Geographic News. 20 Mar. 2006. Web. 3 July 2010.
The fact that natural resources continuous to dwindle is obvious, therefore the need for sustainable energy from alternative resources is completely understandable. Natural gas in the Karoo has raised several optimism regarding the abundance that has been found, however several ethical issues raises when drilli...
The people who are being asked permission to transform their land into drilling sites for natural gas have more reason to be concerned than most because it will affect them more directly than people who do not live in that specific area (although it does affect people who do not live in the vicinity as well). Although fracking may seem to concern to only a small group of people, it should also concern anyone who cares about doing what is safe for our country's citizens. The truth is, fracking is extremely dangerous, not only because of the negative effects on the environment, but also because it could make people ill.
The author discusses the enticement to political groups because of geoengineering’s alleged potential to reverse global warming rapidly and cheaply, as he presents concern regarding the significant risks and the threat of technology gone wrong. The author looks at the basic authority issues raised by geoengineering, its possible functions, governance, and specifically addresses inadequate research funding, rejection, and unilateral vs individual action. Bodansky is a professor at Arizona State University Sandra Day O 'Connor College of Law and has written three books and dozens of articles and book chapters on international law, international environmental law and climate change policy. This article will be a useful tool in discovering
Around the mitten shaped state of Michigan, five gigantic lakes encompass the coast. Providing a spot for vacationers, fisherman, and much wildlife, the Great Lakes are the pride and joy of Michigan. The history of the lakes stretches back thousands of years, where glaciers carved the lakes out of bedrock. These lakes provided a surplus of food and access to easy travel for settlers hundreds of years ago. People around the Great Lakes area appreciate the diversity of wildlife, scenery, and rarity of such landmarks. When the question of whether to drill in these lakes for oil and natural gas came up, it ignited many debates. Is our wildlife more important than oil to us? Or does the presence of oil and natural gas mean we can corrupt our environment and endanger many different types of species, along with ourselves?
The Arctic Tundra The Tundra is located in the northern regions of North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. as well as a few regions of Antarctica. The Tundra is the second largest vegetation. zone in Canada. It can be divided into three different sections: the High Arctic Tundra, the Low Arctic Tundra and the Alpine Tundra.
Douglas considered the United States to be “nature’s nation” (Sowards 170), with so much depending on its abundant land and its wilderness, the preservation of which is the responsibility of those who have a “meaningful relation” (Douglas 356) to them. This is a key idea in his conservation politics (Douglas was fighting for public access to decision-making throughout his career) that also supported the belief that the American system at the time was favorable to the interests of the industry rather than the public interest. Even “"public interest" has so many differing shades of meaning as to be quite meaningless on the environmental front” (Douglas 375) he claims; thus he gives the impression that authorities responsible for public well-being often confuse their personal interest with what is communally beneficial. This suggests that even spokesmen in favor of the inanimate objects might actually be manipulated by agencies who care to promote industrial sort of interests. (One such interest was the building of a ski resort in Mineral King which Douglas’ dissent cared to obstruct.) It is those injustices that Douglas tries to eliminate by supporting the idea that nature should be granted legal personhood, in a similar way to Walker’s attempting to awaken environmental
In many cases around the world, our economy struggles so we look for ways to fix it in things such as environmental destruction. These things vary from oil drilling to freeway placement. Things such as these are beneficial to the economy by bringing in more cash for the community or region. Yet as we increase our economic value, the environment around us decreases. An example for this issue would be drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). Now the idea behind this is that the Republicans have been trying for so long to be able to drill on this sacred land. The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge has been said to be the most pristine areas in the entire United States. The supporters of this drilling have said that by drilling in this place, the oil
When does protecting one’s well-being and those of others for the sake of using natural gas become a priority? This is just one of the questions asked when hydraulic fracturing, more commonly known as fracking, grew in notoriety here in the United States. The United States should stop using this form of drilling if it truly wants to protect its citizens. It must be stopped because it is putting our health at risk by poisoning the water that we drink, wasting billions of gallons of fresh water, and polluting the air that we breathe.
Fish have more known species than any other vertebrate and their habitats range from the smallest freshwater streams to the deepest parts of the seafloor. They grow from a fraction of an inch to 50 feet and live anywhere from the arctic waters to the tropics. Fish skeletons can either be made of nothing but cartilage or nothing but bone. They can look very awkward or very majestic.
The term “impure public goods” designates a system where resources are regulated by a mix of both private and public regulation systems. According to Wade, it offers an alternative to purely private or public forms of regulation: “A third option—local collective action—needs to be taken seriously. Because less public money is likely to be needed for local collective action than for either privatization or state regulation, it makes financial sense to establish local rules where circumstances permit” (Wade 220). The hybridized system of impure public goods is used because it offers cost-cutting benefits, among others. As an example, Cinner’s findings on marine tenure systems, a form of impure public good regulation, suggest that “socioeconomic changes that will increase immigration, open new markets, and decrease dependence on marine resources may influence the ability of communities to employ or maintain exclusive marine tenure regimes. Under these scenarios, conservation and development strategies that rely on high excludability in a community's tenure may become challenged at their foundation” (Cinner). This demonstrates that by definition, impure public goods mu...