Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on modern zimbabwe
The rise and fall of great zimbabwe
Essay on modern zimbabwe
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on modern zimbabwe
Archaeology plays a crucial role in the maintenance of cultural heritage and restoration of it to various groups of people around the world. From Native Americans to the Aboriginal people of Australia and the Shona in Zimbabwe, archaeology has strived to maintain and restore heritage that would otherwise be lost to these groups of people. Through archaeology reconstruction and rebuilding of cultural heritage sites can be made, antiquities can provide a gateway to the past, and groups once stripped of their ways of life can begin to learn about what exactly their ancestors left behind. Through organizations like UNESCO and efforts of diligent archaeologist around the globe, it is possible to maintain heritage for many generations to come. There …show more content…
Upon Zimbabwe’s rediscovery sometime in the 19th century, archaeologist, anthropologist, and geologist simply could not believe that this once powerful civilization was cultivated by the indigenous people. Much of this disbelief was due to the fact that the monuments in this area were crafted from granite stone, something geologist like Carl Mauch and many others like him, were positive the indigenous africans were incapable of. The indigenous africans in Zimbabwe were immediately written off as being unable to construct the beautiful monuments in Great Zimbabwe. To the discoverers, the black africans weren’t complex enough to have such skillfully constructed such monuments which is why Cecil Rhodes, a british colonizer, was able to for a short period of time, wipe away the cultural heritage of the native Zimbabweans. In 1888 Rhodes conquered a large portion of southern Africa which he named after himself. Present day Zimbabwe became a British colony by the name of Rhodesia for the next 100 years. During this time the natives were stripped of their land, their rights, and most importantly their cultural heritage. Rhodes was a strong believer in the same theories as Carl Mauch. Rhodes believed that the Great Zimbabwe monuments were built by foreigners and he was set on proving that this great civilization was not built by …show more content…
“All along the Mississippi River and northward into Wisconsin, up through Ohio and New York, all the way to Lake Ontario, there are remnants of ancient inhabitants that created many earthworks called mounds. Within the mounds, for which many were graves, were great works of stone, clay, copper, and shell that were considered to be grave goods. In the 1800s, there was a debate that was the interest of every educated person in the United States as to what civilization could have made these mounds. Many thought that an ancient race besides the Native Americans made the mounds.”
About 800 years ago, a great civilization inhabited the land in west Alabama, located along the Black Warrior River, south of Tuscaloosa. It encompassed a known area of 320 acres and contained at least 29 earthen mounds. Other significant features include a plaza, or centralized open area, and a massive fortification of log construction. The flat topped, pyramidal mounds ranging from three to 60 feet, are believed to have been constructed by moving the soil, leaving large pits that are today small lakes. As major ceremonial center, up to 3000 people inhabited the central area from 1200-1400 AD. An estimated 10,000 lived around the stockade, which surrounded three sides of the civilization (Blitz 2008:2-3; Little et al 2001:132).
To identify the specific type, functions and time period of the artifacts, various archaeology books, reports, and journal were referred. The interpretation was then conducted by dividing the artifacts into different area on the map and investigating their relationships.
As stated previously, Cahokia is a Native American site that has a unique history to it. As a result, in 1982, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) designated The Cahokian Mound site a World Heritage Site in hopes of preserving the importance of prehistoric American Indian culture in North America (Delta Sources and Resources 2010:62). Cahokia is the largest Native American settlement in North America (Schilling 2012:302). Located in the central Mississippi valley in a section known as the “American Bottom” (Schilling 2012:302). Cahokia consists of at least 120 mounds spanning over five square miles (Delta Sources and Resources 2010:62). Each mound ranges in size, with some measuring only a few centimeters high to some measuring over 80 feet high. It was debated whether the mounds were natures own creation, or man made. Res...
There has been a lot of controversy regarding human remains and the field of archaeology for some time. The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) protect the Native American’s rights over their human remains and cultural items. Proposed by the Morris Udall, former Congress Member for Arizona second District, NAGPRA was passed by the Congress in November 1990. The congress’ intention was to facilitate the repatriation of the Native Americans skeleton and cultural remains that were held in museums and federal agencies. In compliance with the Act, anthropologists returned several skeletal remains that were conserved in their study laboratories and museums to the respective Native tribes. In 1998, for example, the University of Nebraska repatriated over 1702 cultural artifacts to the affiliated Native Americans (Niesel 1). This was a significant blow to the scientific and anthropology studies as it marked the loss of necessary resources in unraveling the development of the human being.
In this ancient place there were all different kinds of remnants from what looked to be a permanent settlement, which led us to believe that it was formed in the Neolithic period. Scientists also believe from the skull fragments found that the Cro-Magnons were the hominid type that inhabited the area. Some of the fossils found helped to prove that the settlement was immobile because the fossilized plants were apparently in a specific arrangement, showing that they were planted purposefully. Some of the cotton grown in this area was apparently used to make woven cloth. Remnants of corn meal were used to make some of the mortar for their establishments, along with mud and sand. They also made their bricks, which were much larger than today’s, from mud. Some of the teeth from the Cro-Magnons were found to be stained. They were thought to be from the coffee ingested due to the high amounts of caffeine deposits in the bones.
This paper examines a National Geographic news article pertaining to the history of First Americans called, “On way to New World, First Americans Made a-10,000 Year Pit Stop”. The First Americans may have stayed on the Bering Land Bridge after separating from Siberia, which would explain a few things about the genetic variances between the two groups. Why do researches believe first Americans lived on the Bering Land Bridge? Are the reasons to believe in this justified? This paper attempts to answer such questions.
... Their existence proves that Africans were capable of managing their own affairs and creating noteworthy civilizations long before Europeans appeared on that continent. They left a legacy that continues to influence the lives of Blacks in Africa and abroad today. BIBLIOGRAPHY Koslow, Philip.
The “Myth of the Moundbuilders” Explored, Again Several theories surround the “myth of the Moundbuilders” despite the data and evidence that exists about who built the mounds and when. Archaeologists debunked this “myth” nearly a century ago and concluded that Native Americans did in fact build the mounds. Yet, there is still speculation surrounding the Moundbuilders due to inquiries about the influences of outside cultures and their effect on the Moundbuilders’ society, as well as, where exactly the ancestors of the Moundbuilders came from. In the film The Lost Civilization of North America an overview of the myriad of myths still surrounding the Moundbuilders are presented for debate between archaeologists and other “experts” over the validity
The archaeology of Africa must be the most important part of learning the history of Africa. If archaeologist were to track the activity of Pre-Africans,
Today, in the 21st century, historians all over the world continue to study ancient civilizations. Archaeologists have found a lot of evidence of ancient civilizations existence that could help to reveal mysteries of the ancient world. Earliest civilizations go through the complex processes of survival, social adaptation and cultural development. Ancient civilizations flashed like stars in the horizon of history, than evolved and flourished, and then destroyed after certain period of time. But they left incredible knowledge of material and spiritual cultures for future generations. Considering the details of origins of ancient civilizations such as ancient Egypt and Greek through the history, modern people could see growth and decline of their cultures, values and scientific achievements which influenced the development of contemporary world.
Processual Archaeology, was a movement in the archaeological field that began in the 1960‘s and changed the course of archaeology forever. Anthropologists such as Julian Steward were absolutely influential on many archaeologists and anthropologists during the early 1960s with his theories of cultural ecology which established a scientific way of understanding cultures as human adaption to the surrounding environment (Steward, 1955: 36-38). It was approaches such as Stewards that led eventually led to a rejection of culture-historical approaches to the archaeological record and propelled the ideas of cultural evolution and its reaction with the environment. This approach to cultural systems was essentially a rejection of the culture-historical approach of determinism by suggesting that the environment influences culture but is not a deterministic feature and that both culture and the environment were two separate systems that are dependent on each other for change (Steward, 1955: 36).
The first European to arrive to Great Zimbabwe was a German explorer named Karl Mauch, in 1871. It was Mauch’s friend, Adam Render, who was also German and was living in the tribe of Chief Pika, that has lead him to Great Zimbabwe. When Mauch first saw the ruins, he abruptly concluded that Great Zimbabwe wasn’t erected by Africans. He felt that the handiwork was too delicate and the people who constructed this showed they were way too civilized to have been the work of Africans.
Old South Africa is best described by Mark Uhlig, “The seeds of such violent conflict in South Africa were sown more than 300 years ago, with the first meetings of white settlers and indigenous black tribes in an unequal relationship that was destined one day to become unsustainable” (116).
... African government, but there are still discreet forms of inequality out there. Ishaan Tharoor states “ Protesters at the University of Cape Town, one of Africa 's most prestigious universities, dropped a bucket of human excrement on a statue of Cecil Rhodes, the swaggering 19th-century British business magnate” (2015). This article that is most recent shows how black students still feel unwelcomed at the university, because of the racial identity. The statue represents when the British colonized South Africa, which further lead to the apartheid. By black students standing up for themselves reveals they are tired of seeing this statue of a man who is some-what responsible for encouraging apartheid. However, the racial barriers black students face in South Africa will continue to influence a change for equal educational opportunities, and maybe some day they will.
This study focuses on the connection of Archeology with different forms of science and even statistics. Archeology has been the major component for many years when it comes to studying human activity and remains of the past and has been used in different areas around the world. There are also many different forms or types of archeology. An important form of archeology is archaeological science or also known as archaeometry. Archaeometry helps narrow down what time period something was created, died or how long it has been around. You are able to study and look back at human activity such as trade routes and diets. With these major proponents Archeologists are able to draw or paint a mental picture about how a certain area looked like. Obsidian sources, diets, deoxyribonucleic acid, dating techniques, residues, neutron activation analysis (NAA), and x-ray fluorescence (XRF) are all major areas that make up archeological science. Also, there are many different types of dating techniques that help in this process. With the dating techniques you can narrow down a time frame if not the actual date when a material was around. NAA and XRF help characterize different materials and residues assist with goods found such as wine and chocolate; obsidian sources give assistance to finding trade routes.