Applying Conflict Theory: Access To Universal Health Care

585 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Karl marx critique on capitalism

1.Conflict Theory: Conflict theory is based off of ideas from Karl Marx (Tischler, 2014), and its focus is on the struggle between societal classes to obtain limited resources (Morris, 2015). They believe strongly that those whom are in power will use any means necessary to maintain it (Tischler, 2014), thus reinforcing the “have” and “have not” mentality (Morris, 2015). They act usually not out of benevolence, but with what will get them the furthest ahead, focusing little attention to constancy within society (Tischler, 2014). Functionalist: Functionalism is a macro-level theory (Morris, 2015), that is primarily based off of Durkheim and Spencer (Tischler, 2014). They believe that different groups within society exist in order for us to see …show more content…

Those who opposed Obamacare could be seen by a conflict theorist as denying universal health care as a form of oppression, yet they could also be seen as greedy for not caring about the health of others because they previously had insurance (Tischler, 2014). Those who belong to a racial minority groups experience lower life expectancy rates, which are often correlated with the unequal opportunities to accessible health care (Tischler, 2014). One might argue that the individuals whom are higher up within society who previously had accessible healthcare would deny this act potentially for maintaining dominance (Tischler, 2014). They might also argue that by using legislation to keep social separation, there will always be an unequal distribution within the service of health care, and conflict theorist believe heavily in unequal distribution of resources (Morris, 2015). These individuals might be viewed as having the authority to keep laws from passing, thus furthering their own agendas (Tischler, 2014). Overall, a conflict theorist might view these individuals as those who want to keep the separation between the wealthy and the impoverished (Morris, 2015), and because they have access politically to resources (Tischler, 2014), use that as an advantage in order to keep healthcare in their

Show More
Related

  • The Three Paradigms In Society

    826 Words  | 2 Pages

    The functionalist paradigm focuses on the integration of society, and how society how its own groups which has their own functions to help improve the peoples lives. Functionalist paradigm fits in the category of macro-sociology, because it focuses on the patterns that shape an entire society. Functionalists believe that society is maintained through the thought of trust and consensus on moral values for ideal behavior. Working together will result in a stable social environment that will create equality. Conflicts or dysfunctions will be view as a disease in the social system. Social conflict paradigm believes that society is divided into many groups that have their own goals, and that certain parts of the world have the luck of benefiting economic dominan...

    Read More

  • Universal Healthcare: The Superior and Necessary Choice

    1968 Words  | 4 Pages

    Even during the worst economic downturn, the advantages of a universal health care system remain hidden from society. Instead, the adverse impacts continue to occupy the minds of many Americans. Misguidedly, citizens are repeatedly ensnared into ideological disputes inc...

    Read More

  • Racial Disparities in the United States Health Care System

    1264 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ity, as well as inequalities in education, employment, and housing, all contribute to health discrepencies. Health care reform, as envisioned within the ACA, should be viewed as treatment of the symptoms of an unequal system, not treatment of the cause. To speak metaphorically, America has a pre-existing condition of institutional racism. Capitalist structure, political climate and discourse, and notions of imperialism, deny treatment. The Affordable Care Act addresses this condition as a localized disease, rather than a systemic one, that’s cause is rooted in the hegemonic reproduction of ideological superstructures. Only when health care is treated as a basic right, rather than an economic commodity, and health disparites are recognized in a greater political context, can health reform offer an opportunity to overcome racial disparities and achieve health equity.

    Read More

  • Comparing Functionalism And Weberianism

    1534 Words  | 4 Pages

    Functionalism focuses on each aspect of society being independent and contributes to stability (Cliffsnotes, 2016.) It ignores the dysfunction of stratification such as poverty (Cliffsnotes, 2016.) Fails to recognize the negative impact of low income, education, mortality and life choices have on people’s life and what this can mean for people trapped in such life cycle (Cliffsnotes, 2016.) The main difference between functionalism and weberianism is functionalism believed that society was naturally heading towards equilibrium (check where this is from)Durkheim believed that there were two types of structures within society, (institutions and social facts), for society to maintain social equilibrium each structure must work together to create a balance (check where this is from .) For example, schools educate the children so they can get a job and put back into society, this relationship was termed ‘manifest functions’ (Brown, 2013.) Functionalism looks at society on a large scale (Moore et al, 2006.) Weberianism focuses more on individuals and how they hold the power to change their status within a competitive society. It describes how people can fight for economic gains; this is proved in history with the rise of the working class (Moore et al, 2006.) This idea later becomes the sociological theory we know as capitalism. Max Weber was interested in understanding the human behavior (Bartle, 2012.) He believed we should show empathy for individuals as understanding the meaning behind the way the individual behaves, is important when determining their place in society and the product of their behavior (Bartle,

    Read More

  • The Force Opposing Universal Healthcare

    1969 Words  | 4 Pages

    James Madison once said, “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition”. In creating a new form of government, Madison tried to effectively plan for a Constitution that would account for the fact that human beings by nature are self-interested. The United States has witnessed tremendous growth within its people since Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. Not only has rapid political and technological advances unified American into a supreme power, but triumphs like the Civil Rights Movement have also helped to promote equality. Yet, from 2009 to 2010, the number of people without health insurance increased from 49.0 million to 49.9 million. Analyzing James Madison’s ideology in The Federalist 10 and 51 suggests that a correlation exists between factionalism and the failure of the United States to universalize healthcare. In order to understand the connection of factionalism and national healthcare this paper will first explain Madison’s notion of factionalism by referencing key components and commentary from his argument in The Federalist 10 and 51. The second part of this paper will discuss the history of American healthcare as a means to explain the many factions that have hindered the success of nationalizing health insurance. Furthermore, referencing the emergence of factions within the healthcare debate, like the AMA (American Medical Association), will highlight the stigma surrounding national healthcare. The last part of this paper will put forward the question of whether America will ever see complete universal health insurance.

    Read More

  • Health Care and the Marxist Theory

    834 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the past centuries, health care was the responsibility of individuals and their own families but today Medicine comes to be an institution only as societies are more productive and people take on specialized work. At the same time as people become dependent on governments and organizations to provide them their health care and insurance, here is the problem. Social conflict analysis points out the connection between health and social inequality. Following the ideas of Karl Marx, we can match health to the operation of capitalism. Most attention has gone to three main issues: access to medical care, the effects of the profit motive, and the politics of medicine.

    Read More

  • Explain and Evaluate Functionalist, Marxist and Interactionist theories of Society.

    1267 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this essay I will be covering Marxist, Interactionist and Functionalist theories of society. I will be examining their strengths and weaknesses. Using the three social theories, the macro approach of Marx that is used to analyse society from a class conflict view between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie, the macro approach that Durkheim used when analysing social systems and populations on a large scale and who’s theory views individual’s issues as reflective of wider social patterns and the micro approach of George Mead who focused on small scale social interaction and who’s theory interprets the behaviour of individuals as significant and a way to interpret how the world is socially constructed.

    Read More

  • Understanding Eating Disorders

    1178 Words  | 3 Pages

    Functionalism is the oldest and most commonly used theoretical approach used to understand social issues. Functionalism is a macrosociological perspective that presents the idea that society consists of different components working together to help a society function as one. Sociolog...

    Read More

  • Social Conflict Theories and Functionalism

    900 Words  | 2 Pages

    .... Functionalism is much too conservative, and does not have a way to explain major changes in society. The conflict theory does not explain some of the more orderly and stable parts of society. They both make good points, and both have good arguments. I however, cannot endorse one over the other for the simple reason that they are both essentially wrong and right at the same time. A conflict theorist is correct in saying that money and power do give you special considerations, and conflicts are at the base of most social change, however, they are wrong in assuming that all social institutions are unstable. A functionalist is correct in saying that the society is made up of interdependent and interacting parts, but wrong in their conservative assumptions. A blend of the two would probably provide the greatest base for an argument and would probably be the most real.

    Read More

  • Essay On Health Care Inequality

    526 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the United States, is Health Care Equally Distributed? The Health Care Industry is one of the largest Social Institutions, made to ensure communities wellbeing. The issue at hand, is that health care distribution is directly correlated to one’s income. In most cases, health care is often not distributed to those who need it but cannot afford it, and is to those who can afford it and may not need it. Health Care equality can be related to both Conflict and Functionalist Theories.

    Read More

  • Conflict Theory Of Health And Medicine

    1008 Words  | 3 Pages

    Health is considerably one of the most important things an individual should worry about. Health is essential for day to day activities and can determine how long a person has have to live. However, there are many problems with the current health system today such as drug companies taking advantage of numerous individuals. It seems that health is not prioritised for the right reasons. According to the U.S. National Library of Medicine, Medical Sociology is defined as “concerns with the relationship between social factors and health.” By this definition medical sociology classifies under Conflict Theory. Conflict theory “suggests that issues with the healthcare system… [is] rooted in capitalist society” (Openstax 2013: 444).

    Read More

  • Stakeholders And Universal Health Care

    326 Words  | 1 Pages

    The "advocate" stakeholder represents the vulnerable population who have a difficult time accessing health care. The vulnerable population they are concerned with includes racial and ethnic minorities, children, women and HIV/AIDS infected individuals. Advocates goal is for health care services to be guaranteed to everyone ( ). The "President" stakeholder would like to lower the high cost of the United States (U.S.) health care system. The president believes the main issue that is hindering the American citizens from accessing health care is the increase in medical costs. Also, the president is for a universal health care and is in the process of trying to make universal health care a reality ( ).

    Read More

  • Structural Functionalism Research Paper

    579 Words  | 2 Pages

    Structural Functionalism or what I call just functionalism, is just another theory that has society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability. This approach looks at society through the macro-level of orientation, which is a broad focus on the social structures that shape society as a whole, and believes that society has evolved like organisms. This approach looks at both social structure and the social functions. Functionalism has society as a whole in terms of the function of its constituent elements; namely norms and customs, traditions, and institutions. There is a common analogy, popularized by Herbert Spencer that presents these parts of society as "organs" that works towards the proper functioning of the "body" as a whole. In the most basic terms, it simply emphasizes "the effort to impute and the rigorously as possible, to each feature, custom, or even practice the effect on the functioning of a supposedly stable and cohesive system.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Structural Functionalism And Conflict Theory

    1021 Words  | 3 Pages

    It says the only the most qualified and exceptional individuals should have the jobs which influence society the most. This is different from Conflict Theory because conflict theory states that stratification causes the most highly paid positions to not always be the most important positions (or jobs) in society. It causes prestige and power to be places around these highly paid position and some groups such as women and minorities are systematically disadvantaged from these prestigious positions. In contrast these two collide when your most talented individuals who have some of the most important jobs in society aren 't making what they should be. I personally like to think that the Structural Functionalist Theory is the most convincing in the United States because there are a lot of jobs and positions that are very prestigious that requires year of high education and effort. I certainly think that a large number of people who have high influencing jobs like doctors, lawyers, and politicians are the most qualified. However, there is always the small few that fly underneath the radar that maybe aren 't as qualified for the job as another

    Read More

  • Conflict Theory On Bullying

    771 Words  | 2 Pages

    A structural functionalist would say that society is not working together and that the problem is that we all don’t share the same values and that the bullies who obviously are not socialized property should be removed from society and that would solve the problem. A social conflict theorist believes in nine things society is like a pyramid, The elite are at the top of the pyramid and the masses are at the bottom, those on the top of the pyramid hold all the power, Those with the power determine the values for society, the glue that holds society together is force, societal members learn the values of the powerful through the socialization process, society is always in a state of conflict, different people and groups will always be struggling to gain power, those with the economic and political power will shape society to their advantage. A social conflict theorist would say that this topic proves that society is always in a state of conflict because people don’t get along and that different people and groups will always be struggling to gain power because the different people are the masses which are at the

    Read More

More about Applying Conflict Theory: Access To Universal Health Care

Open Document