Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Character development introduction
Character development introduction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Complexity is what ultimately helped Anton to accept his traumatic past; he gained clarity about the murder of his family once he realized how complex the situation truly was, clarity that he did not have due to his naiveté and innocence at the time of the assault. Not only did this complexity give Anton clarity when it came to the assault, it also became evident that blame could not be placed on one sole individual.
The Assault touches on many different aspects of a very traumatic night during the second world war, in which all but one member of the Steenwijk family were murdered by the German Field Police. Anton Steenwijk was the only survivor from that fateful night in 1945; he was a mere twelve years old at the time. His age and his innocence
…show more content…
At first, Anton could not comprehend why they had to murder Pleog where they did, if they had chosen another location his family would have been spared. Takes had said, “We had chosen that spot because it was the most secluded and the easiest to get away from. And we had to get away, for we had a few more scum like that on our list.” (Mulisch, pg.113). The resistance was not known for violence, so the fact that they had decided to kill Ploeg and others must have meant that these people were truly dangerous and better off dead. According to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) the Dutch resistance “operations consisted primarily of organizational and networking functions, as well as gathering intelligence on the occupation forces.” (Bentley, Stewart). Not only did the resistance gather intel on the enemy but they conducted “the hiding and sheltering of Netherlands Jews and young draft-age Dutch men and women by other Dutch...” (Bentley, Stewart). This proves that although out of the ordinary, violence from the resistance was sometimes necessary at such a dark time. If Anton were older when this event unfolded perhaps he would have better understood the logic behind the murder, he would have better understood the resistance and their motive. Children are often shielded from certain aspects of the conflict happening around them, but now since Anton is grown he has a …show more content…
As a child, Anton understood what the Kortewegs had done to his family; they had framed the Steenwijks. Yet again complexity comes into play when Anton meets Karin Korteweg at a peace demonstration and Karin tells her side of the story. When looking at complexity it may seem that it only does as it implies: complicates things. But in this case, it is valuable to Anton. The Kortewegs are yet another example as to why Anton cannot place blame on one group of individuals. There are always different side to the same story, that is certainly the case when it comes to Karin Korteweg. Her father had motives for wanting to move Pleogs body in front of the Steenwijk’s house, whether they were reasonable is another question. After absorbing all this new information Anton knows that the Aartses were “hiding Jews” (pg.183) in their home. The Aartse family was different than the rest of the neighbourhood perceived them to be; they were closed off as a safety precaution. There is a lesson to be taken from that, you can never fully understand a situation until you know all the details of it. During the second world war, any Jewish people that had “left their designated residential area, will be punished to death.” (Death Penalty for Aiding Jews). Not only would those innocent people die “but the same penalty applies to anyone who knowingly provides refuge (a hiding place) to
The reader is confronted with an interpretation of life in Jedwabne as a shared experience. With the town population of 2,500 and about two-thirds of the residents are Jewish and the rest Polish and Catholic, it was hard for anyone to participate in the economic, social, and political area without inflicting conflict on people with different ideas. Although, Gross claims that religious or ethnic difference did not partake in a role of the engagement between the Non-Jewish and Jew individuals of Poland. He avoids situating the Jedwabne experience among other anti-Jewish mass murders. The Jedwabne experience is represented by Gross's reliance on individual testimonies by direct interviews, interviews done by other interviewers, and memoirs. Court documents from the 1953 trial such the recounts from perpetrators and memoirs from survivors or family of the survivors assist in further evidence of the event. Although, the reliance on testimonials clearly highlights the issue of responsibility. Put another way, rather than providing a clear choice by disregarding the massacre as a hate crime, Neighbors gives the reader the ability to interpret the actions done by the Non-Jewish Poles was completed due the belief of kill or be killed. When a community is demoralized by war,
...it may help us arrive at an understanding of the war situation through the eyes of what were those of an innocent child. It is almost unique in the sense that this was perhaps the first time that a child soldier has been able to directly give literary voice to one of the most distressing phenomena of the late 20th century: the rise of the child-killer. While the book does give a glimpse of the war situation, the story should be taken with a grain of salt.
On the night of March 5th, it is believed that a small group of boys began taunting a British soldier. Over the boys’ nonsense, the soldier battered one of his oppressors with his musket. Soon after the alleged incident a crowd of about fifty or sixty people surrounded the frightened solider. The enraged crowd of people sounded the soldier, encouraging him to call for backup. Soon after calling for help, seven soldiers along with Captain Preston...
His role in the assault cost him his brother and the love of his life, and he never seemed to recover from the loss of the latter, as Anton saw when he visited Take’s house and saw the obsession Takes had with the war: “Was this the reason why the map was hanging there? Not because of an insidious nostalgia for the War, but because her [Truus] mouth was imprinted on it? (137)” This quote shows just how lost Takes is in the past. He is consumed in it, he thinks of nothing else, and it makes him miserable. For Takes and the others that invested their lives in the war, they might as well be dead with the rest of their comrades, because they have no interest in the advancements of the world around them. Takes only seems to talk about the past: a Nazi war criminal has been released from prison and one of his old conspirator friends killed himself. He doesn’t care about how Anton feels about the war, and pushes him to the very limit asking Anton about Truus. Anton, as discussed previously, wants nothing to do with remembering the night Ploeg was assassinated, and gets increasingly more and more uncomfortable with Takes. Both of these men lost loved ones in the war, but because Takes was older, he was not able to gather his life up again; the defeat of the Nazis was his life, and when they were defeated, his life metaphorically
In Elie Wiesel’s Night, he recounts his horrifying experiences as a Jewish boy under Nazi control. His words are strong and his message clear. Wiesel uses themes such as hunger and death to vividly display his days during World War II. Wiesel’s main purpose is to describe to the reader the horrifying scenes and feelings he suffered through as a repressed Jew. His tone and diction are powerful for this subject and envelope the reader. Young readers today find the actions of Nazis almost unimaginable. This book more than sufficiently portrays the era in the words of a victim himself.
A story of a young boy and his father as they are stolen from their home in Transylvania and taken through the most brutal event in human history describes the setting. This boy not only survived the tragedy, but went on to produce literature, in order to better educate society on the truth of the Holocaust. In Night, the author, Elie Wiesel, uses imagery, diction, and foreshadowing to describe and define the inhumanity he experienced during the Holocaust.
Elie Wiesel’s memoir Night, is an account about his experience through concentration camps and death marches during WWII. In 1944, fifteen year old Wiesel was one of the many Jews forced onto cattle cars and sent to death and labor camps. Their personal rights were taken from them, as they were treated like animals. Millions of men, women, children, Jews, homosexuals, Gypsies, disabled people, and Slavic people had to face the horrors the Nazi’s had planned for them. Many people witnessed and lived through beatings, murders, and humiliations. Throughout the memoir, Wiesel demonstrates how oppression and dehumanization can affect one’s identity by describing the actions of the Nazis and how it changed the Jewish
Tragically, the butchered upper-torso of Winter’s once-robust body was stumbled upon by his father, who had noticed the absence of his son since Sunday, March 11 (Smith 2002, 25-26). Unsurprisingly, an investigation occurred to obtain the identity and whereabouts of the murderer. When the various pieces of the body are found in differing areas of the town, theory begins to formulate that the murder was conducted by one of the two butchers in town; Adolph Lewy, a Jew, and Gustav Hoffman, a Christian, due to the precision of the cuts made upon Winter’s body (Smith 28). As fragile relations between Konitz-residing Christians and Jews increasingly began to deteriorate, rumors and speculation that Winter had fallen victim to ritual murder by local Jews, set the ball in motion for a virulent anti-Semitic nature characteristic of Imperial Germany.
When Mulisch sends Anton to visit Takes and discuss what happened on the night of the assault, the reader learns that Cor Takes and Truus Coster risked their lives to assassinate Fake Ploeg because they thought it was the right thing to do. The two came to the conclusion that it was time to liquidate Ploeg because he had “killed God knows how many people, and sent many more to their deaths in Germany and Poland” (111). Anton also learns that Ploeg “had a whip with barbed wire braided into it that ripped the skin off your bare ass, which he then shoved against the blazing stove” as a form of punishment (111). Learning of Ploeg’s transgressions helps Anton understand why Coster felt the need to sacrifice her own life to eliminate some of the “Fascist gentlemen” that had brought turmoil to her country, and brings him to the realization that Takes’ motive for participating in the crime was revenge (113). Takes even suggests kidnapping children because “all the love and happiness and goodness in [the] world [cannot] outweigh the life of a single child” or the children of his enemies (113). Although their motivations were different, they worked together to eliminate Ploeg. They both kne...
The events which have become to be known as The Holocaust have caused much debate and dispute among historians. Central to this varied dispute is the intentions and motives of the perpetrators, with a wide range of theories as to why such horrific events took place. The publication of Jonah Goldhagen’s controversial but bestselling book “Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust” in many ways saw the reigniting of the debate and a flurry of scholarly and public interest. Central to Goldhagen’s disputed argument is the presentation of the perpetrators of the Holocaust as ordinary Germans who largely, willingly took part in the atrocities because of deeply held and violently strong anti-Semitic beliefs. This in many ways challenged earlier works like Christopher Browning’s “Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland” which arguably gives a more complex explanation for the motives of the perpetrators placing the emphasis on circumstance and pressure to conform. These differing opinions on why the perpetrators did what they did during the Holocaust have led to them being presented in very different ways by each historian. To contrast this I have chosen to focus on the portrayal of one event both books focus on in detail; the mass shooting of around 1,500 Jews that took place in Jozefow, Poland on July 13th 1942 (Browning:2001:225). This example clearly highlights the way each historian presents the perpetrators in different ways through; the use of language, imagery, stylistic devices and quotations, as a way of backing up their own argument. To do this I will focus on how various aspects of the massacre are portrayed and the way in which this affects the presentation of the per...
The Forgotten Soldier is not a book concerning the tactics and strategy of the German Wehrmacht during the Second World War. Nor does it analyze Nazi ideology and philosophy. Instead, it describes the life of a typical teenage German soldier on the Eastern Front. And through this examined life, the reader receives a first hand account of the atrocious nature of war. Sajer's book portrays the reality of combat in relation to the human physical, psychological, and physiological condition.
A tragic hero is defined as a person of high social rank, who has a tragic flaw or flaws that lead to their downfall. These heroes’ downfalls are usually either complete ruin or death. Tragic heroes face their downfall with courage and dignity. While many characters in Julius Caesar could fit these conditions, the person who fits the role of a tragic hero the best is Marcus Brutus. Brutus develops into a tragic hero throughout the play, and this is shown though his qualifications of a tragic hero, his high status, his tragic flaws, and his courage in the face of his death.
Director Mark Herman presents a narrative film that attests to the brutal, thought-provoking Nazi regime, in war-torn Europe. It is obvious that with Herman’s relatively clean representation of this era, he felt it was most important to resonate with the audience in a profound and philosophical manner rather than in a ruthlessness infuriating way. Despite scenes that are more graphic than others, the films objective was not to recap on the awful brutality that took place in camps such as the one in the movie. The audience’s focus was meant to be on the experience and life of a fun-loving German boy named Bruno. Surrounding this eight-year-old boy was conspicuous Nazi influences. Bruno is just an example of a young child among many others oblivious of buildings draped in flags, and Jewis...
Bruno, an eight year old boy at the time of the war, is completely oblivious to the atrocities of the war around him - even with a father who is a Nazi commandant. The title of the book is evidence to this - Bruno perceives the concentration camp uniforms as "striped pajamas." Further evidence is the misnomers "the Fury," (the Furher) and "Out-With" (Auschwitz). Bruno and Shmuel, the boy he meets from Auschwitz, share a great deal in common but perhaps what is most striking is the childhood innocence which characterizes both boys. Bruno is unaware that his father is a Nazi commandant and that his home is on ther periphery of Auschwitz. Shmuel, imprisoned in the camp, seems not to understand the severity of his situation. When his father goes missing, Shmuel does not understand that he has gone to the gas chamber.