Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Anton Chekhov and his characters
Anton Chekhov and his characters
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Anton Chekhov and his characters
Anton Chekhov is a Russian writer; he writes short stories. In his short stories he relies on characterization to make his points about a character in few words. Some believe that since no build up of exciting events happen his stories are meaningless. However, Chekhov’s stories are thought by others to be enjoyable. While others think they’re a waste of time to read due to the lack of events happening; I think Chekhov focusing on characters emotions and what they say is much more important. In other words Chekhov primarily uses internal drama rather than external drama. Chekhov avoids doing what so many other writers do which is using lots of details describing the environment, what they wore, their life background; instead, he gives the reader just enough detail to picture the character and gets to the point he’s trying to make. An example of his limited word use occurs in “The Huntsman”. This short story is about an unmarried couple that see each other again years later. The unmarried couple is Yegor Vlassitch and Pelagea; they’re complete opposites. Pelagea is a peasant; meanwhile, Yegor is a hunter that can’t be tied down. When Pelagea sees Yegor she “(springs) out of the earth…and smiles diffidently as soon as she sees the huntsman” (Chekhov 1). The phrase “a happy couple" wouldn’t be an accurate way to describe the two. Regardless, Pelagea loves him very much, so much that she’s delighted when she sees him, “I (haven’t) seen you since… you came…and (you) beat me… (I’ve) been waiting” (Chekhov 1). Despite the fact that he treats her badly, she doesn’t want him to leave again. Meanwhile, the huntsman is in a hurry to leave but before leaving he says he “shall never come (back) sober” (Chekhov 3). Unlike the one sided love... ... middle of paper ... ...5 years. He agrees to stay in confinement for 15 years for the money; as time goes by; he learns new languages, about philosophy and reads a great amount of books. Once the fifteen years are nearly up, the banker is determined to kill him because he doesn’t have the money to pay the lawyer. The night before the time is up the Banker goes into the room to complete the deed. He finds a letter from the lawyer, in which he wrote “to prove to you I despised all that you live by I renounce the two millions… which I once dreamed (of)” (Chekhov 956). The lawyer changes to a better possibly happier person; meanwhile, the banker realizes the monster money has made him; he was just about to commit murder to avoid paying two million dollars. This shows us that money can make a man do just about anything to have it. This short story emphasizes that life is worth more than money.
The language that Tolstoy uses engages the audience by making them feel like they are actually a part of the story. With death being a main subject in the story, Tolstoy practically forces the reader to live, breathe, and smell death. Tolstoy knew exactly how to pull his audience in with descriptive language and made them understand Ivan’s point of view successfully.
... (Chekhov). Further, he has stated that “The artist must not be the judge of his characters and of their conventions, but merely an impartial witness” (Chekhov). He has been very influential in the evolution of the short story because of his “stream-of-consciousness” which is exemplified by Daisy in The Stone Diaries. Although there were not many similiarites I was able to find between Canadian Literature and “The Nina Variations,” a close analysis of Checkov’s techniques has helped me to better understand Realism and the influences it has on Canadian Literature.
Chekhov’s descriptions, although less visual, are just as descriptive as Updike’s. The descriptive wording chosen by these two authors represents more than just the words themselves, but actions, images, and feelings that evoke a response, whether it be a vision or an emotion. Both authors are able to captivate the reader by what is in reality just word choice and sentence structure. Fiction is very much mechanical, putting together well-chosen words in a precise, particular sentence structure, and when executed properly it’s incredible to see the emotional and visual reactions it prompts from the reader. It’s an art, just as painting is mechanical too – putting paint on a canvas in a very certain way. When carried out correctly, the results can be magnificent.
... Fine attitudes, seemingly insignificant, stimulate a complex histrionic and almost imperceptible state. As in the case of Shakespeare, the words have multiple meanings, inducing unfettered states full of emotions (Nabokov, 12). Unexpected events form a logical but unpredictable flow that structures the Chekhovian existence. The Art of the Chekhovian Language escapes from the personal intentions.
“As actors we must rejoice in the possession of our physical faculties. We must experience joy in the use of our hands, arms, body etc. Without this appreciation and realization of the body and its many possibilities, we cannot perform as artists”, A statement by the actor, director and teacher of the theatre, Michael Chekhov. What does it mean to experience joy within our hands, arms and body? After all, joy is an emotion triggered from the mind. Chekhov’s somewhat enigmatic statement can seem confusing to actors or persons without the knowledge of his teachings. What does it mean to rejoice in the possession of our physical faculties?
A comparison of Chekhov 's and Oates ' authorial approaches to constructing the nature of the affairs reveals that there is a most important similarity in what the authors decided to do and a most important
Chekhov was born in Taganrog, Russia in 1860 to a woman named Yevgeniya and a man named Pavel. His father, who shares the name of the bishop, is described as being “severe” and sometimes went as far as to chastise Chekhov and his siblings (Letters
It seems as though Pyotr and Alexeich both represent different aspects of Chekhov’s father, and Chekhov himself is Anna. Chekov’s father was aloof from his family and came from a lower class background; like Modest Alexeich, Chekhov’s father also fawned at the feet of his social superiors. Chekhov, in contrast, was an unconventional boy. He eventually broke from his family’s lower class position and became a doctor; however, throughout his school and career he performed additional odd jobs to earn money he could send to his father. Also like Anna, Chekhov loved to be with people (Payne xiii, xvii-xxi). Comparing the two, then, it would seem as if Chekhov identifies with Anna as she struggles to find her social identity and wrestles with her desires and the needs of those she loves. This tone gives the story a melancholy mood and leads to a bittersweet conclusion. The ending seems happy for Anna, yet the reader is left to wonder what the ending represents. Did her father and husband receive the dues for their behavior? Are Anna’s actions a normal product of the transformation from youth to adulthood, or did she come to completely discard respect and
Chekhov reminds the readers that Anna is young compared to Gurov. Chekhov’s novel states, “As he went to bed he reminded himself that only a short time ago she had been a schoolgirl, like his own daughter” (3). The images of Anna being a schoolgirl not too long ago, when Gurov has a daughter of similar age, brings the sense of abnormality between the relationship of Gurov and Anna. It’s hard to imagine such a huge difference in lovers especially in the strict culture of Russia in the late 19th century where these occasions were unthought-of. The uncomforting thought of the difference in age goes back to differ the meanings of love and romance in the novel because against all odds and differences, Anna and Gurov hide away from these obvious facts. The thought of love in this culture is between a man and woman of similar age. According to Chekhov’s novel, “He was sick of his children, sick of the bank, felt not the slightest desire to go anywhere or talk about anything” (9). Chekhov’s description of sickness reveals that Gurov has a huge moment of denial, denial of family and denial of age. This denial of age, helps Gurov cope with the oddities of their relationship, the oddities of the love they had with the characteristics of a romance. Gurov was trying to change the definition of their relationship on his own mental terms. While Gurov was trying to bring out a spontaneous, younger
In addition, Chekhov also utilizes allegory, imagery and symbolism. The Geisha, for example, serves as an a...
Chekhov used characterization to put forward the message that greed is a truly crippling trait of mankind. Through both the actions and dialogue of the banker the reader saw how greed causes man to behave. Via the dialogue and thoughts of the dynamic character, the lawyer, the reader realized the awful results of avarice. Greed is a timeless theme that, throughout history, has had a perpetually poor outcome.
Ivan Denisovich Shukhov is a man that has learned to deal with a life that is an endless struggle for survival. For example, Shukhov has learned to prioritize the necessities of his life. One being a decent amount of food daily. Shukhov has been able to learn the ropes of the camp and know what he has to do and who he has to interact with in order to get them. He also knows that he should not take lightly what he has and because of that, more than once saved pieces of bread, from an already small meal, for times when he knows he will need them more. Furthermore, Shukhov knows that he is not the only one with a life like his and treats his fellow “zets” with the help and compassion they deserve. He has helped out many of the other zets learn to survive in the work camp and in turn is given more respect than others. In addition, Shukhov, although dehumanized at almost every time of the day, is still able to keep values of his own. Values of respect, to those who have earned it; self pride, so not to be pushed around by just anyone; and even after eight years of facing the bitter cold he will not eat with his hat on. It is Shukhov’s character that kept him alive and sane after eight years in the harsh Stalinist Work Camp.
"The Bear," which is a classic one-act play written 1900, is one of the great works of Anton Chekhov, which is very much about a widowed woman. The Bear can be regarded as a comedy since it is to give the audience entertainment and amusement. This comedy reveals the fine line between anger and passion. The theme is about a strange beginning of love between Mrs. Popov and Smirnov. It demonstrated that love changes all things it touches. Dialogue of the characters, the action of the characters, and the characters themselves shape the theme. Unbelievable actions and change in mood on the part of the characters show that love can sometimes come from an odd turn of events.
... story but it also reflects Russian society. This, however, isn’t why many Russians still continue to hold this piece of literature as central to their culture. Although, it tells of their heritage and society, it is the simple genius of the structure of the novel of –14-line stanza form-and his lyrics, which are complex and meticulous but are written with such ease that they appear effortless, simple, and natural.
Matlaw, Ralph E. Anton Chekhov¡¦s Short Stories: Texts of the Stories Bachgrounds Criticism. New York: W.W. Norton & Company Inc., 1979.