Antisocial Personality Disorder Case Study

1073 Words3 Pages

Introduction
The purpose of this article is to examine in detail the mental health disorder known as antisocial personality disorder. Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) is a mental disorder that is characterized by “a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others” (Hatchett, 2015, p. 17). The questions that this paper seeks to answer are, how does ASPD affect individuals and their functioning, what are the potential caused of the disorder, what kinds of therapeutic approaches are there for treatment, and what empirical support is there for the effectiveness of those treatments. One thing that must be understood when doing this research is the difference between Psychopathy and ASPD. Some have the opinion that
309). According to Black (1999), this pattern is defined by the with seven categories of symptoms, which are an inability to socially conform, deceitfulness, impulsivity, irritability, a disregard for safety, irresponsibility, and lack of remorse. These people therefore tend to do things such as breaking laws, putting others in danger for their own advantage, and trying to trick others into doing different things for them (pp. 42-43). Although only three of the symptom categories need to be shown, lack of remorse may be the most important, as “how a patient views his behavior is as important as the behavior itself” (Black, 1999, p. 43). Although people with antisocial personality disorder may know what they 're doing is wrong, they don 't feel any remorse. Therefore will participate in these other behaviors that are exploitative and destructive on impulse decisions, without a second
In one 2002 study, Skeem et al. “found that participants who completed a 0-6 treatments were far more likely to commit a violent act during a 10-week assessment period than those who completed 7 or more sessions.” (as cited in Hatchett, 2015, p. 20). A 1992 study done by Rice, Harris, and Cormier matched 146 male untreated psychopathic offenders with 146 treated offenders, and the results showed that after an average follow-up of 10.5 years, “treatment was associated with lower violent recidivism for non psychopathic individuals but higher violent recidivism for psychopathic individuals” (as cited in Grimes, Salekin, & Worley, 2010, p.

Open Document