Anti Slavery States Pros And Cons

204 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Racism in america history

My thoughts on Oregon history of racism is pretty messed up and sucks on so many levels. The biggest factor I think is screwed is that the “racial exclusionary clause in its constitution” is seriously not ok and the fact, we not too long ago lifted/ removed it from Oregon. I like the fact we consider ourselves an ant-slavery state at the time of the civil war, only because we didn’t want people to bring there “black-slaves” into Oregon to take our white people jobs, from white people. So we considered ourselves as an anti-slavery state, but would we consider selves as a discriminating sate? I would, because we created constitution to ban black people to be legal citizens in Oregon, knowing it was against the Unites States amendment. I think

Show More
Related

  • Nothing Like It in the World by Stephen E. Ambrose

    1220 Words  | 3 Pages

    Yeng, Sokthan. The Biopolitics of Race: State Racism and U.S. Immigration. USA: Lexington Books, 2013. Print.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Slave Insurrection

    723 Words  | 2 Pages

    Slave insurrection occurred in a multitude of ways. Slaves practiced everyday resistance as well as planned and executed more elaborate forms of resistance. One form of resistance was strikes. During a strike Negros would flee to the swamps or forests and send back word that they would return if their demands were made. Demands would often include food, clothes, fewer beatings, shorter hours, or a new overseer. If demands were met they would return. However during the Civil War the demand of payment of wages. During this era they won “lifting themselves by their own bootstraps from chattels to wage workers”.3

    Read More

  • The History of Slavery in the United States

    1435 Words  | 3 Pages

    Following the success of Christopher Columbus’ voyage to the Americas in the early16th century, the Spaniards, French and Europeans alike made it their number one priority to sail the open seas of the Atlantic with hopes of catching a glimpse of the new territory. Once there, they immediately fell in love the land, the Americas would be the one place in the world where a poor man would be able to come and create a wealthy living for himself despite his upbringing. Its rich grounds were perfect for farming popular crops such as tobacco, sugarcane, and cotton. However, there was only one problem; it would require an abundant amount of manpower to work these vast lands but the funding for these farming projects was very scarce in fact it was just about nonexistent. In order to combat this issue commoners back in Europe developed a system of trade, the Triangle Trade, a trade route that began in Europe and ended in the Americas. Ships leaving Europe first stopped in West Africa where they traded weapons, metal, liquor, and cloth in exchange for captives that were imprisoned as a result of war. The ships then traveled to America, where the slaves themselves were exchanged for goods such as, sugar, rum and salt. The ships returned home loaded with products popular with the European people, and ready to begin their journey again.

    Read More

  • Appalachia Culture

    1512 Words  | 4 Pages

    So what is Appalachia? Appalachia is no different from any other person in this world. The people had to struggle just as bad as some of us did, but were criticized because they lived in the mountains or away from other people. They didn’t know that once they sold their land for the oil miners that they would loose everything and eventually be run out from their own homes. They couldn’t help being poor or not being able to go to school and get the proper education like most of us got. So why do we still have these same stereotypes now as they had before? One description was that they walked barefoot and I guess I’m part of the Appalachian region because I walk outside almost everyday barefoot even though I had my thoughts about which Appalachian people were. Appalachia is part of our history that people don’t know much about or they wouldn’t have these stereotypes.

    Read More

  • Slavery: Northern v. Southern

    665 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the 1980's southern blacks from the United States dedicated to migrate to the north with the belief that the north had more opportunities and advantages blacks. Although, Frederick Douglas and Booker T. Washington opposed a migration to the north, millions of blacks migrated northward. The industries for the blacks migrating t o the north was what Douglas and Washington feared, black northern workers being placed in the same situation prior to their movement. Blacks were going to experience the same obstacles and disadvantages as they had in the south just with different situations. Northern blacks were going to experience prejudice, riots and murdering.

    Read More

  • The Pro-slavery Constitution

    612 Words  | 2 Pages

    The original version of the Constitution is a result of a series of compromises made to achieve a document that would be voted by the majority of the newly emerged states. Slavery was a very sensitive issue, as it was widely common on the continent.

    Read More

  • John Brown

    932 Words  | 2 Pages

    How the Actions of Governor Wise and the State of Virginia in the Case of John Brown may be easily Justified.

    Read More

  • Slavery During, In, and After the Civil War

    982 Words  | 2 Pages

    the same feelings yet a different color for their own good . This was quite

    Read More

  • The U.S. Constitution and Slavery

    408 Words  | 1 Pages

    The US constitution was written with great vision to create strong nation. The bill of right were written, it provide all humans with rights. The writers of the constitution we hypocrites, they didn’t abide by what they preached. Thomas Jefferson wrote himself “ all men are created equal” but he owned slaves. The founding father didn’t look or even think about slavery when they wrote the constitution. They were pre-occupied in getting the southern state to join the union and sign the new constitution. They southern states believed that the federal government shouldn’t mess with the issue on slavery because slavery was a state issue.

    Read More

  • Comparing Slavery of the South and North

    1600 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Americas (north and south) was referred to as the new world since they had recently been discovered by the Europeans. The Spanish, Portuguese and the Dutch resolutely instituted slavery in the Americas by the 1600s. Slavery refers to the practice of holding a person in bondage for labor. Nonetheless, slavery was not new to the Native Americans; it was a common practice with its root in the world’s earliest civilizations. Similarly, slavery evolved and took various forms in history. For example, there were societies in which slaves worked as domestic servants in households of rich families. In others, slaves were working in mines and fields. People were enslaved when they were captured in battle or sold to pay off debts. A number of societies treated slaves with respect; indeed, they were even allowed to marry and own property. Slaves’ children were allowed to go free and were entitled to all rights enjoyed by other citizens. Nonetheless, slavery started to change with the advent of sugar plantations.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Reparation Of Slavery

    1153 Words  | 3 Pages

    Reparations Although the talk of reparations of slavery has been in discussion for over a hundred years, it is beginning to heat up again. Within these discussions, the issue of the form of reparations has been evaluated and money has been an option several times. However, reparations in the form of money should not be obtained for several reasons. Firstly, it is not a solution to the problem, secondly monetary reparations have the ability to worsen discrimination, thirdly, who gets paid, and how is it regulated, and lastly, the money can be misused.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Civil War

    1092 Words  | 3 Pages

    When thinking about the necessity of war it is always hard to determine when it ever really is essential for change to be made. There are different sides of a war and while sometimes many, in simplest form there are really only two sides of a war. Both sides of a war are said to be correct depending on whom is telling the story or argument. In the case of the Civil War slavery was the main opposition through this time and the division was through the North and the South. On the subject of the Civil War being a battle to be avoid it would have to be no. The Civil War was a long time coming. There are many reasons as to why America could not have continued with such opposing views on the ownership of slaves. With such an issue of an individual’s

    Read More

  • The Creation Of The Constitution

    1073 Words  | 3 Pages

    In creating the Constitution, the states had several different reactions, including a rather defensive reaction, but also an understanding reaction. As a document that provided the laws of the land and the rights of its people. It directs its attention to the many problems in this country; it offered quite a challenge because the document lent itself to several views and interpretations, depending upon the individual reading it. It is clear that the founders’ perspectives as white, wealthy or elite class, American citizens would play a role in the creation and implementation of The Constitution.

    Read More

  • Discuss The Advantages And Disadvantages Of The South In The Civil War

    486 Words  | 1 Pages

    How did the north and the south had advantages and disadvatages in the Civil War. Well the North had an advatage because they had more railroads more than the south the north had 20,000 railroad miles and the south had 10,000 another advatage that the north had is that they had a bigger population than the south the north had 350,000 people that surved and then 200,000 so north had a bigger advantage. Another advantage that the north had is that they had a navy and the south didnt have a navy so the north took over the missisippi river and the rivers where important to the union and the confederancey because the confederates didnt have much railroads so they had to relay on rivers so then the union took over all the rivers in the seige of vicksburg in july 4th 1863.

    Read More

  • Ethical Principles in The Help

    1646 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...ctitious, the content depicted the historical treatment of black maids during the time of Jim Crow Laws. Did the laws of Mississippi constitute ethical mistreatment of humans? Regardless, the treatment of non-white people in the state of Mississippi was not ethical even though it was the law.

    Read More

More about Anti Slavery States Pros And Cons

Open Document