More handpicked essays just for you.
The relationship between sport and culture
Influences of sport in society
The relationship between sport and culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Anti-Participation
Should kids get a trophy for participation? In society today, there is major controversy on how young people are treated for their participation in activities. Some argue that all kids receive a trophy based off of their participation and not on actual achievements. While others argue that only those young people that succeed in their participation should receive an award or trophy. As standard practice in today’s American culture, all participants are receiving some type of reward simply for “trying.” There are many pros and cons to participation trophies. Ultimately, all athletes are trying to win the game. Kids should not earn a trophy merely for participation. The first reason kids should not receive trophies for participation is because it does not reward the right goal. There is clearly a difference between winning and losing and the only way for children to learn the difference is to experience it. A child should be reward for putting in the extra effort and being noticed above the other children around them. Parents that are pro-participation are often worried about the issue of self-esteem. The idea of
…show more content…
Kids need to work hard to get the reward that they deserve. Participation trophies are not honoring any specific accomplishments whatsoever, which is why they are often condemned. “Last month, Harrison posted on Instagram a photo and message saying he had taken away the trophies given to his 6- and 8-year-old football-playing sons. To raise his boys to be men, he said he needs them to understand that even trying “their best” shouldn’t entitle them to award.” (Ross) While there are some kids who excel over others, with participation trophies they are all acknowledged equally which isn't fair to overachieving children. This could cause kids to give up on their hard work because in the end everyone is given the same
Some people may argue that if everyone gets a trophy, everyone will be happy. That might be an understandable concern, however, according to people on blog.sportssignup.com, “By acknowledging everyone with the same award we’re actually celebrating no one and even undermining the efforts of those who really deserve to be recognized.” Similarly, it makes the kids who work really hard feel like there efforts were equal or worse than the efforts of those who do not try hard and do not work hard. On the other hand, if everyone gets a trophy than winners are no longer special. Kids should play sports because they enjoy playing them, not because they want a trophy. It is like one of those arcade games at the movie theater, you keep playing until you win. Another way to say this is, sports were made because they wanted to let people have fun and try to compete, but now sports is turning into the concept of everyone is a winner. Kids and adults feel like we are ruining what sports are supposed to be. In summary, many citizens think that kids should not get trophies for participation because only kids who work hard deserve
L. Hefferman’s article “ In Defense of Participation Trophies: Why they really do teach the right values?” it states “ An award is not really an award if everyone gets it.” (Today.com) In another article by Ashley Merryman called “Losing is Good For You” it says “Awards can be a powerful motivators but nonstop recognition does not inspire children to succeed. Instead, it can cause them to underachieve.” (New York Times Sept. 2013) It is clear, by not giving participation awards it make the children who do get awarded feel more special than if everyone gets one. Obviously, not giving participation awards to everyone gives more of a boost of self-esteem to the people who do get
Our society has shifted its beliefs in how we should treat competition in young people. The question is asked, should all kids get a participation trophy? As it may seem to be an unanswerable question, it honestly isn’t. Thought that the participation trophies may send the message that “coaches” value the kids’ efforts despite their abilities, trophies do not need to be given out. Your words mean just as much when you remind an athlete that you value them in more ways than one. Some may think trophies are a great idea because it shows that everyone’s a “winner.” However, I disagree with that idea. I believe that kids should know that they need to work their hardest in order to be rewarded and understand that not
Handing out participation trophies does not teach kids about the real world. O’Sullivan says, “We reward them for having a parent capable of registering them for a sport.” Participation trophies are for registering and showing up the day they hand out trophies, they are not for hard
According to researcher and author of “Top Dog: The Science of Winning and Losing,” Ashley Merryman says “having studied recent increases in narcissism and entitlement among college students, (she) warns that when living rooms are filled with participation trophies, it’s part of a larger cultural message: to succeed, you just have to show up.” She also says “if children know they will automatically get an award, what is the impetus for improvement? Why bother learning problem-solving skills, when there are never obstacles to begin with?” She goes on to say handing out trophies undermines kids’ success: “The benefit of competition isn’t actually winning”. Another author says “when you’re constantly giving a kid a trophy for everything they’re doing, you’re saying, ‘I don’t care about improvement. I don’t care that you’re learning from your mistakes. All we expect is that you’re always a winner’” (Ross). These particiation trophies have many negative effects that can make these children less succesful in competitive enviornments: such as college or in the work force. It will also make them less prepared for an independent life after leaving
A participation trophy can help a child's drive to improve. When a child plays a game and loses, but then watches the other team get a trophy they feel that they suck and won't try to improve. Once they get a participation trophy they make the child feel like they did good and that next time if they get better they will get a bigger trophy for winning and not losing. For instance, “Further, studies also tell us that children who participate in sports get better…”(Huffington 1). This exemplifies that children who participate feel the drive to get better at the sport. When inferring that since they participated they are getting an award if makes them feel like they did good, and then they want to get even better to get a better reward. Thus making the kids get better at the sport showing that participation trophies are beneficial to children, but there are more opportunities to show how they are
Todays generation of kids have been crafted to expect praise for everyday tasks and have become entitled all because of something many people thought was harmless, participation trophies. If you ask anyone, they have probably recieved a participation trophy at least once in their life and some will think it was a good thing, but others may beg to differ. In my opinion participation trophies are a bad tool in life because it goes along and is a big part of the we are all winners concept. Trophies should be a symbol of accomplishing something not a symbol of participation in an activity and a few people have written about their opinion about this situation varying from critical writers, to college athletes from around the country here are
Opponents argue that participation trophies are fair solution in youth sports. However, if both teams received a trophy it would not be fair to the winning team. The team that wins is the team that put forth the proper effort in preparing for the game. Children need to learn that they cannot win everything in life, it is impossible to always win. But at the same time, children also need to learn that it is okay to lose at times. Losing is a great too...
Recently, the topic of participation trophies and direct achievement has been debated among parents, schools, and coaches as it seems that within every event, children are awarded with some form of acknowledgement. Plaques, certificates, medals, and trophies are thrown at kids left and right; but, do they have a significance in a child’s overall ability to discern achievement from failure? Or do these seemingly meaningless trinkets have more worth in memory and core values like perseverance and commitment?
Some people think that giving children a participation trophy after a sports game or season is a helpful thing to do. People may think this because it can teach kids the importance of showing up to practice and games and trying your best, which are important skills later in life. (Heffernan 1) Kids will also be happy that their hard work is being acknowledged and rewarded, in the form of a trophy. (Heffernan 1) However, this
First of all, participation trophies can make kids feel like they are not good, or they are worthless to their team. Participation trophies let kids get rewarded for not acomplishing anything. I believe that if you want something in life you are going to have to work hard for it to achieve it. Participation trophies are a waste of money for the sports foundations providing the trophies. The money used for participation trophies could be used for the betterment of something else sports related like getting new equipment, or building a new baseball feild, or a new basketball court. The people that get participation trophies feel like they wasted their money on something that does not give them any pleasure.
Have you ever have a kid on your team miss half of the practices, and games? If so, then why should kids get a trophy for showing up? In society, many people are arguing whether or not kids should get trophies for participation. Not everyone should get a trophy for participation. First, if kids want something in life they have to work for it. Second, trophies are only for winners. Lastly, giving kids trophies could send them the wrong message.
This proves that experts believe that participation trophies are awards for kids that don’t win and make it so that they don’t strive to win and improve their abilities. According to The Sun's Washington correspondent and sports reporter, Jeff Barker stated that kids need to learn to “take the good with the bad. ”(Baltimore Sun). This quote shows that kids need to be able to learn lessons and improve instead of being rewarded for making mistakes. Overall, if people want their kids to be the best or improve their skills participation trophies should not be given out.
Doing this would only add to the emerging culture of selfishness (Kozicka). The original idea behind participation trophies was that they would provide kids a boost of confidence that would push them to do more challenging things. However, today approximately 20 years of research proves this assumption to be false. It promotes a false sense of accomplishment, and instead of boosting their esteem, narcissism can occur
Participation trophies are used to reward kids to show them that everyone's a winner. It shows that all they had to do is show up. Is this rewarding system good for the development of our children and the way they look at things competitively? “Trophies for all convey an inaccurate and potentially dangerous life message to children: We are all winners. ”-